Listing 1 - 6 of 6 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
541.5 <063> --- Chemical reaction, Conditions and laws of --- -Valence (Theoretical chemistry) --- -Valency (Theoretical chemistry) --- Chemical affinity --- Chemical elements --- Chemical structure --- Chemistry, Physical and theoretical --- Conditions and laws of chemical reaction --- Reaction, Conditions and laws of (Chemistry) --- Physical laws --- Valencies. Bonds. Affinity--Congressen --- Congresses --- Conferences - Meetings --- Valence (Theoretical chemistry) --- Congresses. --- -Valencies. Bonds. Affinity--Congressen --- 541.5 <063> Valencies. Bonds. Affinity--Congressen --- -541.5 <063> Valencies. Bonds. Affinity--Congressen --- Valency (Theoretical chemistry) --- Charge exchange. --- Electron transport. --- Bond --- Spectra --- Valence
Choose an application
Leadership. --- Qualité totale --- Qualité --- Contrôle --- Direction par objectifs --- Style de management
Choose an application
Choose an application
Choose an application
How should an investor unwind a portfolio in the face of recurring and uncertain liquidity needs? We propose a model of portfolio liquidation in two periods to investigate this question, initially posed by Myron Scholes following the fall of Long Term Capital Management. We show that when the expectation of future liquidity needs is low, the optimal solution involves selling assets that have low permanent and temporary price impacts of trading. However, when there is a high probability of a large future liquidity need, the optimal solution involves retaining assets that have a small temporary impact of trading. In the face of potential future adversity, there is a high option-value to the temporary component of liquidity. The permanent component of liquidity does not share this feature, so that investors will prefer to sell assets with a low ratio of permanent to temporary price impact in the early stages of a crisis, and to hold on to assets with a high ratio of permanent to temporary price impact to protect themselves against an aggravation of the crisis.
Choose an application
How should an investor unwind a portfolio in the face of recurring and uncertain liquidity needs? We propose a model of portfolio liquidation in two periods to investigate this question, initially posed by Myron Scholes following the fall of Long Term Capital Management. We show that when the expectation of future liquidity needs is low, the optimal solution involves selling assets that have low permanent and temporary price impacts of trading. However, when there is a high probability of a large future liquidity need, the optimal solution involves retaining assets that have a small temporary impact of trading. In the face of potential future adversity, there is a high option-value to the temporary component of liquidity. The permanent component of liquidity does not share this feature, so that investors will prefer to sell assets with a low ratio of permanent to temporary price impact in the early stages of a crisis, and to hold on to assets with a high ratio of permanent to temporary price impact to protect themselves against an aggravation of the crisis.
Listing 1 - 6 of 6 |
Sort by
|