Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Malawi can be understood as a microcosm of institutional reform approaches in developing countries more broadly. A common feature of such approaches, whether implemented by government or donors, is reform initiatives that yield institutions that "look like" those found in higher-performing countries but rarely acquire the same underlying functionality. This paper presents a retrospective analysis of previous institutional reform projects in Malawi, as well as interviews with Malawi-based development practitioners. The paper finds a plethora of interventions that, merely by virtue of appearing to be in conformity with "best practices" elsewhere, are deemed to be successful yet fail to fix underlying problems, sometimes in contradiction to internal and public narratives of positive progress. This unhappy arrangement endures because a multitude of imperatives, incentives, and norms appear to keep governments and donors from more closely examining why such intense, earnest, and long-standing efforts at reform have, to date, yielded so few successes. This paper seeks to promote a shift in approach to institutional reform, offering some practical recommendations for reform-minded managers, project teams, and political leaders in which the focus is placed on crafting solutions to problems that Malawians themselves nominate, prioritize, and enact.

Capacity Building --- Civil Service --- De Facto Governments --- Democratic Government --- Development Effectiveness --- Economics and Institutions --- Governance --- Institutions --- Legitimacy --- Macroeconomics and Economic Growth --- Non-Governmental Organizations --- Public Sector --- Public Sector Development --- Public Sector Management and Reform --- Reform --- Technology Industry --- Technology Innovation

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

This paper uses Zambia as a case study to assess empirically whether political interference in a low-governance environment has diminished in the past years as expected after a semi-autonomous agency model was set up ten years ago. The road sector in Zambia has experienced some significant developments since then. The paper uses data on contract from 2008 to 2011 and analyses a number of key trends related to Road Development Agency governance and staffing dynamics as well as procurement and project selection within the institution. The main findings indicate that, after some years of implementation of these reforms, there is reason to question whether the model of semi-autonomous agency enables road management to be shielded from political interference. Zambia may be an isolated case but, so far, this model does not seem to have been able to decrease political interference in the selection or supervision of projects and there seems to have been an increased lack of accountability of civil servants working in this sector.

Banks and Banking Reform --- Conflict and Development --- Finance and Financial Sector Development --- Governance --- Post Conflict Reconstruction --- Procurement --- Public Sector Corruption and Anticorruption Measure --- Public Sector Development --- Roads --- Rural Development --- Rural Roads & Transport --- Staff Issues --- Transport --- Transport Economics, Policy & Planning