Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

This book examines the ethical and legal challenges presented by modern techniques of memory retrieval, especially within the context of potential use by the US government in courts of law. Specifically, Marc Blitz discusses the Fourth Amendment’s protections against unreasonable searches and the Fifth Amendment's self-incrimination clause. He also argues that we should pay close attention to another constitutional provision that individuals generally don’t think of as protecting their privacy: The First Amendment’s freedom of speech. First Amendment values also protect our freedom of thought, and this—not simply our privacy—is what is at stake if government engaged in excessive monitoring of our minds.  Marc Jonathan Blitz is Alan Joseph Bennett Professor of Law at Oklahoma City University, USA, and series editor of Palgrave Studies in Law, Neuroscience, and Human Behavior.

General ethics --- Legal theory and methods. Philosophy of law --- Human rights --- Criminology. Victimology --- HO (hoger onderwijs) --- psychosociale wetenschappen --- psychologie --- filosofie --- recht --- United States of America

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Freedom of thought is one of the great and venerable notions of Western thought, often celebrated in philosophical texts – and described as a crucial right in American, European, and International Law, and in that of other jurisdictions. What it means more precisely is, however, anything but clear; surprisingly little writing has been devoted to it. In the past, perhaps, there has been little need for such elaboration. As one Supreme Court Justice stressed, “[f]reedom to think is absolute of its own nature” because even “the most tyrannical government is powerless to control the inward workings of the mind.” But the rise of brain scanning, cognition enhancement, and other emerging technologies make this question a more pressing one. This volume provides an interdisciplinary exploration of how freedom of thought might function as an ethical principle and as a constitutional or human right. It draws on philosophy, legal analysis, history, and reflections on neuroscience and neurotechnology to explore what respect for freedom of thought (or an individual’s cognitive liberty or autonomy) requires. Marc Jonathan Blitz is Alan Joseph Bennett Professor of Law at Oklahoma City University, USA. His scholarship and teaching focus on how emerging technologies – such as cognitive enhancement, brain scanning technologies, and virtual and augmented reality – raise questions about freedom of speech, privacy, and other areas of American constitutional law. Jan Christoph Bublitz is a researcher at the Faculty of Law at Universität Hamburg, Germany. His research focuses on criminal law, legal theory, and human rights law, often with an interdisciplinary twist. He was awarded the Young Scholar Prize of the International Association of Legal and Social Philosophy for studies on the right to freedom of thought.

Neuropsychology. --- Neurosciences. --- Forensic psychology. --- Cognitive psychology. --- Law—Philosophy. --- Law—History. --- Law and the social sciences. --- Neuroscience. --- Forensic Psychology. --- Cognitive Psychology. --- Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History. --- Socio-Legal Studies. --- Social sciences and law --- Social sciences --- Sociological jurisprudence --- Psychology, Cognitive --- Cognitive science --- Psychology --- Juridical psychology --- Juristic psychology --- Legal psychology --- Psychology, Forensic --- Forensic sciences --- Psychology, Applied --- Neural sciences --- Neurological sciences --- Neuroscience --- Medical sciences --- Nervous system --- Neurophysiology --- Psychophysiology --- Pensament --- Llibertat de consciència --- Neurociència cognitiva --- Aspectes morals --- Llibertat --- Psicologia pedagògica --- Associació d'idees --- Atenció --- Criteri --- Definició (Lògica) --- Dogmatisme --- Ideologia --- Pensament crític --- Raonament (Psicologia) --- Treball intel·lectual --- Cognició --- Lògica --- Representació (Filosofia) --- Llibertat individual --- Ciències polítiques --- Democràcia --- Dret natural --- Conformisme --- Poder sobre la vida i la mort --- Anarquisme --- Drets humans --- Aspectes ètics --- Ètica --- Condicions morals --- Neurociències cognitives --- Neuropsicologia cognitiva --- Ciència cognitiva --- Neuropsicologia --- Neuroeconomia --- Xarxes neuronals (Neurobiologia) --- Intolerància --- Llibertat moral --- Consciència (Moral) --- Tolerància --- Objecció de consciència --- Pensament màgic --- Law --- Philosophy. --- History. --- Legal history --- Jurisprudence --- History and criticism

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Freedom of thought is one of the great and venerable notions of Western thought, often celebrated in philosophical texts – and described as a crucial right in American, European, and International Law, and in that of other jurisdictions. What it means more precisely is, however, anything but clear; surprisingly little writing has been devoted to it. In the past, perhaps, there has been little need for such elaboration. As one Supreme Court Justice stressed, “[f]reedom to think is absolute of its own nature” because even “the most tyrannical government is powerless to control the inward workings of the mind.” But the rise of brain scanning, cognition enhancement, and other emerging technologies make this question a more pressing one. This volume provides an interdisciplinary exploration of how freedom of thought might function as an ethical principle and as a constitutional or human right. It draws on philosophy, legal analysis, history, and reflections on neuroscience and neurotechnology to explore what respect for freedom of thought (or an individual’s cognitive liberty or autonomy) requires. Marc Jonathan Blitz is Alan Joseph Bennett Professor of Law at Oklahoma City University, USA. His scholarship and teaching focus on how emerging technologies – such as cognitive enhancement, brain scanning technologies, and virtual and augmented reality – raise questions about freedom of speech, privacy, and other areas of American constitutional law. Jan Christoph Bublitz is a researcher at the Faculty of Law at Universität Hamburg, Germany. His research focuses on criminal law, legal theory, and human rights law, often with an interdisciplinary twist. He was awarded the Young Scholar Prize of the International Association of Legal and Social Philosophy for studies on the right to freedom of thought.

Pensament --- Llibertat de consciència --- Neurociència cognitiva --- Aspectes morals --- Llibertat --- Llibertat individual --- Ciències polítiques --- Democràcia --- Dret natural --- Conformisme --- Poder sobre la vida i la mort --- Anarquisme --- Drets humans --- Aspectes ètics --- Ètica --- Condicions morals --- Neurociències cognitives --- Neuropsicologia cognitiva --- Ciència cognitiva --- Neuropsicologia --- Xarxes neuronals (Neurobiologia) --- Intolerància --- Llibertat moral --- Consciència (Moral) --- Tolerància --- Objecció de consciència --- Psicologia pedagògica --- Associació d'idees --- Atenció --- Criteri --- Definició (Lògica) --- Dogmatisme --- Ideologia --- Pensament crític --- Raonament (Psicologia) --- Treball intel·lectual --- Cognició --- Lògica --- Representació (Filosofia) --- Neuropsychology. --- Law (Philosophical concept) --- Intellectual freedom. --- Access to ideas --- Freedom of thought --- Freedom to read --- Intellectual freedom --- Liberty --- Academic freedom --- Censorship --- Freedom of information --- Freedom of speech --- Law (Philosophy) --- Philosophy --- Neurophysiology --- Psychophysiology --- Law and legislation --- Neurosciences. --- Forensic psychology. --- Cognitive psychology. --- Law—Philosophy. --- Law—History. --- Law and the social sciences. --- Neuroscience. --- Forensic Psychology. --- Cognitive Psychology. --- Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History. --- Socio-Legal Studies. --- Social sciences and law --- Social sciences --- Sociological jurisprudence --- Psychology, Cognitive --- Cognitive science --- Psychology --- Juridical psychology --- Juristic psychology --- Legal psychology --- Psychology, Forensic --- Forensic sciences --- Psychology, Applied --- Neural sciences --- Neurological sciences --- Neuroscience --- Medical sciences --- Nervous system