Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

This text examines the political thought of China, Greece Israel, Rome, India, Iran, Egypt, Mesopotamia, and also early Christianity. Each of these had its own priorities, based on a religious and philosophical perspective. This led to different ideas about who should govern, how to govern, and what government was for.

Political science --- Civilization, Ancient --- State, The --- World politics --- Political Science --- Law, Politics & Government --- Political Theory of the State --- History --- Philosophy --- Political aspects --- Origin --- Wereldgeschiedenis. --- Political philosophy. Social philosophy --- Antiquity --- Rome --- Greece --- Assyria, Babylonia, Mesopotamia --- China --- India --- Israel --- Egypt --- Science politique --- Civilisation ancienne --- Etat --- Politique mondiale --- History. --- Philosophy. --- Political aspects. --- Origin. --- Histoire --- Philosophie --- Aspect politique --- Origines

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Church and state --- Communities --- Conciliar theory --- Eglise et Etat --- Communauté --- Théorie conciliaire --- History. --- Religious aspects --- Christianity --- History of doctrines --- Histoire --- Aspect religieux --- Christianisme --- -Community --- Social groups --- Christianity and state --- Separation of church and state --- State and church --- State, The --- History --- -Christianity --- -History of doctrines --- History of doctrines. --- -History --- Communauté --- Théorie conciliaire --- Community --- Religious aspects&delete& --- Christianity&delete&

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

This comparative history of political thought examines what the Western and Islamic approaches to politics had in common and where they diverged. It throws light on why the West and Islam each developed their own particular kind of approach to government, politics, and the state, and on why these approaches are so different.

Political science --- Islam and state --- Christianity and politics --- Comparative government --- Political Science --- Law, Politics & Government --- Political Science History --- Comparative political systems --- Comparative politics --- Government, Comparative --- Political systems, Comparative --- State, The --- Mosque and state --- State and Islam --- Ummah (Islam) --- History. --- History --- History of theories --- Science politique --- Islam et Etat --- Christianisme et politique --- Histoire

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

260.322.3 --- Concilies: leergezag. Conciliarisme --- Conciliar theory. --- Political science --- History --- 260.322.3 Concilies: leergezag. Conciliarisme --- Conciliar theory --- Conciliarism --- Théorie conciliaire --- Papes --- Église et État --- History. --- Primauté --- Pouvoir temporel

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

This text examines the political thought of China, Greece, Israel, Rome, India, Iran, Egypt, Mesopotamia, and also early Christianity. Each of these had its own priorities, based on a religious and philosophical perspective. This led to different ideas about who should govern, how to govern, and what government was for.

Political science --- World politics. --- State, The --- Civilization, Ancient --- Philosophy --- History. --- Origin. --- Political aspects. --- Ancient civilization --- Origin of the State --- Colonialism --- Global politics --- International politics --- Political history --- World history --- Eastern question --- Geopolitics --- International organization --- International relations