Listing 1 - 10 of 13 | << page >> |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
This paper measures the size of the stock of intangible capital in Canada using newly released data on the market value of all securities in the economy. The approach taken relies on a quantitative application of the q-theory of investment to generate the quantity of capital owned by firms. I find that the intangible capital stock accounted for approximately 30% of overall capital since 1994. Of this intangible capital stock, the R&D reported by national accounts makes up only 23%. In addition, the finding on the magnitude of the intangible capital stock is comparable to that reported using a cost approach, confirming the size and the relevance of intangibles to macroeconomic models.
Finance --- Business & Economics --- Investment & Speculation --- Capital market --- Securities --- Canada --- Economic policy. --- Capital markets --- Market, Capital --- Financial institutions --- Loans --- Money market --- Crowding out (Economics) --- Efficient market theory --- Investments: General --- Investments: Stocks --- Macroeconomics --- Investment --- Capital --- Intangible Capital --- Capacity --- Pension Funds --- Non-bank Financial Institutions --- Financial Instruments --- Institutional Investors --- General Aggregative Models: General --- General Financial Markets: General (includes Measurement and Data) --- Investment & securities --- Intangible capital --- Stocks --- National accounts --- Depreciation --- Saving and investment --- National income --- Financial instruments
Choose an application
This paper constructs a data set to document firms' expenditures on an identifiable list of intangible items and examines the implications of treating intangible spending as an acquisition of final (investment) goods on GDP growth for Canada. It finds that investment in intangible capital by 2002 is almost as large as the investment in physical capital. This result is in line with similar findings for the U.S. and the U.K. Furthermore, the growth in GDP and labor productivity may be underestimated by as much as 0.1 percentage point per year during this same period.
Business & Economics --- Economic History --- Gross domestic product --- Labor productivity --- Investments --- Econometric models. --- Investing --- Investment management --- Portfolio --- Labor output --- Productivity of labor --- Domestic product, Gross --- GDP --- Finance --- Disinvestment --- Loans --- Saving and investment --- Speculation --- Industrial productivity --- Capital productivity --- Hours of labor --- Labor time --- Productivity bargaining --- Gross national product --- Investments: General --- Macroeconomics --- Public Finance --- Data Processing --- Databases --- National Government Expenditures and Related Policies: General --- General Aggregative Models: General --- Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology --- Computer Programs: General --- Investment --- Capital --- Intangible Capital --- Capacity --- Public finance & taxation --- Data capture & analysis --- Expenditure --- National accounts --- Data collection --- Intangible capital --- Data processing --- Expenditures, Public --- National income --- Economic statistics --- Electronic data processing --- Canada
Choose an application
This paper extends the q-theory of investment to model explicitly the decision of firms to invest in intangibles and measures the contribution of intangible goods to the overall capital stock in the U.S. The model highlights the embodiment of intangible goods in tangibles and the role of relative price movements in the measurement of the contribution of each type of investment to the overall capital stock. The downward trend in the aggregate investment deflator series reported by national accounts is found to have a significant downward bias in the 90s. The model also shows that the growth in the overall capital stock from the late-80s until 2000 was driven mainly by an increase in the contribution of intangibles. However, the contribution of intangibles fell consistently after 2000. These results underscore the importance of accounting for the movements in the price of intangibles rather than focusing only on their rising share in overall investment.
Investments --- Stockholders --- Investments: General --- Investments: Stocks --- Labor --- Macroeconomics --- Pension Funds --- Non-bank Financial Institutions --- Financial Instruments --- Institutional Investors --- Investment --- Capital --- Intangible Capital --- Capacity --- General Aggregative Models: General --- Price Level --- Inflation --- Deflation --- Professional Labor Markets --- Occupational Licensing --- Investment & securities --- Labour --- income economics --- Stocks --- Intangible capital --- National accounts --- Price indexes --- Skilled labor --- Saving and investment --- National income --- Labor market --- United States --- Income economics
Choose an application
How do financial markets respond to concerns over debt sustainability and the level of public debt in emerging markets? We introduce a measure of debt sustainability – the difference between the debt stabilizing primary balance and the primary balance–in an otherwise standard spread regression model applied to a panel of 26 emerging market economies. We find that debt sustainability is an important determinant of spreads. In addition, using a panel smooth transition regression model, we find that the sensitivity of spreads to debt sustainability doubles as public debt increases above 45 percent of GDP. These results suggest that market interest rates react more to debt sustainability concerns in a country with a high level of debt compared to a country with a low level of debt.
Debts, External --- Economic development --- Exports and Imports --- Finance: General --- Macroeconomics --- Public Finance --- Financial Markets and the Macroeconomy --- Fiscal Policy --- International Lending and Debt Problems --- International Financial Markets --- Debt --- Debt Management --- Sovereign Debt --- General Financial Markets: General (includes Measurement and Data) --- International economics --- Public finance & taxation --- Finance --- Debt sustainability --- Fiscal stance --- Public debt --- Emerging and frontier financial markets --- External debt --- Fiscal policy --- Financial markets --- Debts, Public --- Financial services industry --- United States
Choose an application
Italy’s labor productivity in market services has declined since 2000, underperforming manufacturing and peer European countries, especially in strongly regulated sectors. A model of monopolistic competition is used to identify which service sectors would benefit more from removing entry and/or exit barriers. Using Italian firm-level data, the paper finds that sectors with high markups, such as professional services, would primarily benefit from removing entry barriers. Sectors with a large mass of unproductive firms, such as retail, would instead benefit from removing exit barriers. Policy recommendations to improve efficiency are outlined in relation to the sectoral priorities identified in the data.
Finance: General --- Labor --- Industries: Service --- Production and Operations Management --- Production, Pricing, and Market Structure --- Size Distribution of Firms --- Industry Studies: Services: General --- Macroeconomics: Production --- Human Capital --- Skills --- Occupational Choice --- Labor Productivity --- General Financial Markets: General (includes Measurement and Data) --- Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs: General --- Macroeconomics --- Finance --- Labour --- income economics --- Productivity --- Labor productivity --- Services sector --- Competition --- Wages --- Production --- Economic sectors --- Financial markets --- Industrial productivity --- Service industries --- Italy
Choose an application
Italy’s labor productivity in market services has declined since 2000, underperforming manufacturing and peer European countries, especially in strongly regulated sectors. A model of monopolistic competition is used to identify which service sectors would benefit more from removing entry and/or exit barriers. Using Italian firm-level data, the paper finds that sectors with high markups, such as professional services, would primarily benefit from removing entry barriers. Sectors with a large mass of unproductive firms, such as retail, would instead benefit from removing exit barriers. Policy recommendations to improve efficiency are outlined in relation to the sectoral priorities identified in the data.
Italy --- Finance: General --- Labor --- Industries: Service --- Production and Operations Management --- Production, Pricing, and Market Structure --- Size Distribution of Firms --- Industry Studies: Services: General --- Macroeconomics: Production --- Human Capital --- Skills --- Occupational Choice --- Labor Productivity --- General Financial Markets: General (includes Measurement and Data) --- Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs: General --- Macroeconomics --- Finance --- Labour --- income economics --- Productivity --- Labor productivity --- Services sector --- Competition --- Wages --- Production --- Economic sectors --- Financial markets --- Industrial productivity --- Service industries --- Income economics
Choose an application
The modernization of Italy’s insolvency framework has been the subject of much interest in recent years, related not least to its role in potentially facilitating an efficient allocation of resources. A unique feature of Italy’s insolvency framework is a special regime for large enterprises known as “extraordinary administration”. This paper evaluates the merits of this special regime by assessing its efficacy and success in achieving its stated goals and comparing its features to international standards and best practices. It finds that the special regime tends to impose large costs on creditors and the state. The regime results, in most cases, in the sale of parts of the group, followed by a liquidation phase of the remaining assets which can take longer than the general regime, hindering legal certainty for creditors and more generally economic efficiency, investment and job creation. Based on international best practices and experience, consideration should be given to folding the special regime into the general insolvency regime, possibly with provisions to allow for state intervention in specific well-defined circumstances.
Macroeconomics --- Economics: General --- International Economics --- Public Finance --- Finance: General --- Banks and Banking --- Corporate Finance --- Labor --- Foreign Exchange --- Informal Economy --- Underground Econom --- Bankruptcy --- Liquidation --- Corporation and Securities Law --- Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue: General --- Financial Institutions and Services: Government Policy and Regulation --- Employment --- Unemployment --- Wages --- Intergenerational Income Distribution --- Aggregate Human Capital --- Aggregate Labor Productivity --- Economic & financial crises & disasters --- Economics of specific sectors --- Public finance & taxation --- Finance --- Labour --- income economics --- Financial crises --- Economic sectors --- Administration in revenue administration --- Revenue administration --- Solvency --- Financial sector policy and analysis --- Special resolution regime --- Corporate insolvency --- Currency crises --- Informal sector --- Economics --- Revenue --- Debt --- Crisis management --- Economic theory --- Italy --- Income economics
Choose an application
The reform of the Italian public administration has been a priority for at least two decades, with several major initiatives undertaken toward modernization and simplification. Notwithstanding laudable intentions, however, progress remains limited. This analysis is a case study of two reforms since 2016—on the rationalization of state-owned enterprises and of public procurement. It finds that original reform provisions were weakened or overturned, regulatory complexity and uncertainties in the application of the reforms blunted their impact, and enforcement mechanisms were inadequate. Addressing these gaps will be essential for successfully modernizing Italy’s public administration.
Finance: General --- Macroeconomics --- Public Finance --- Bureaucracy --- Administrative Processes in Public Organizations --- Corruption --- National Government Expenditures and Related Policies: Infrastructures --- Other Public Investment and Capital Stock --- National Government Expenditures and Related Policies: Procurement --- Public Enterprises --- Public-Private Enterprises --- General Financial Markets: General (includes Measurement and Data) --- Labor Economics: General --- Fiscal Policy --- Public finance & taxation --- Civil service & public sector --- Finance --- Labour --- income economics --- Public investment spending --- Public sector --- Competition --- Labor --- Fiscal governance --- Expenditure --- Economic sectors --- Financial markets --- Fiscal policy --- Public investments --- Finance, Public --- Labor economics --- Italy
Choose an application
The Insolvency Regime for Large Enterprises in Italy: An Economic and Legal Assessment.
Choose an application
The reform of the Italian public administration has been a priority for at least two decades, with several major initiatives undertaken toward modernization and simplification. Notwithstanding laudable intentions, however, progress remains limited. This analysis is a case study of two reforms since 2016—on the rationalization of state-owned enterprises and of public procurement. It finds that original reform provisions were weakened or overturned, regulatory complexity and uncertainties in the application of the reforms blunted their impact, and enforcement mechanisms were inadequate. Addressing these gaps will be essential for successfully modernizing Italy’s public administration.
Italy --- Finance: General --- Macroeconomics --- Public Finance --- Bureaucracy --- Administrative Processes in Public Organizations --- Corruption --- National Government Expenditures and Related Policies: Infrastructures --- Other Public Investment and Capital Stock --- National Government Expenditures and Related Policies: Procurement --- Public Enterprises --- Public-Private Enterprises --- General Financial Markets: General (includes Measurement and Data) --- Labor Economics: General --- Fiscal Policy --- Public finance & taxation --- Civil service & public sector --- Finance --- Labour --- income economics --- Public investment spending --- Public sector --- Competition --- Labor --- Fiscal governance --- Expenditure --- Economic sectors --- Financial markets --- Fiscal policy --- Public investments --- Finance, Public --- Labor economics --- Income economics
Listing 1 - 10 of 13 | << page >> |
Sort by
|