Listing 1 - 6 of 6 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Human rights --- Basic rights --- Civil rights (International law) --- Constitutionnalité des lois -- Contrôle --- Contrôle de constitutionnalité --- Contrôle judiciaire --- Contrôle juridictionnel de la constitutionnalité des lois --- Contrôle juridictionnel des lois --- Droits de l'homme --- Droits de la personne --- Droits fondamentaux --- Droits individuels --- Grondrechten --- Inconstitutionnalité des lois --- Judicial review --- Juridische controle --- Kontrole [Juridische] --- Libertés publiques --- Lois -- Contrôle juridictionnel --- Mensenrechten --- Rechten van de mens --- Review [Judicial ] --- Rights [Human ] --- Rights of man --- Révision judiciaire des lois --- Comparative law --- Civil rights --- Droits de l'homme (Droit international) --- Droit comparé --- Review, Judicial --- Constitutional law --- Courts --- Delegation of powers --- Executive power --- Judicial power --- Legislation --- Legislative power --- Rule of law --- Separation of powers --- Rights, Human --- Human security --- Transitional justice --- Truth commissions --- Law and legislation --- Human rights. --- Judicial review. --- Direitos humanos --- Droits de l'Homme --- Menschenrechte --- Contrôle juridictionnel des lois --- Droit comparé
Choose an application
This work addresses the age-old tension between law and politics by examining whether the personal beliefs of judges come into play in adjudicating on issues of religious freedom, sex discrimination, and social and economic rights.
Rule of law --- Judicial review --- Law, General & Comparative --- Law, Politics & Government --- Review, Judicial --- Constitutional law --- Courts --- Delegation of powers --- Executive power --- Judicial power --- Legislation --- Legislative power --- Separation of powers --- Supremacy of law --- Administrative law --- Teoría legal --- Imperio de la ley --- Revisión judicial --- Rule of law. --- Judicial review.
Choose an application
Choose an application
Human Rights and Judicial Review: A Comparative Perspective collects, in one volume, a basic description of the most important principles and methods of analysis followed by the major Courts enforcing constitutional Bills of Rights around the world. The Courts include the Supreme Courts of Japan, India, Canada and the United States, the Constitutional Courts of Germany and Italy and the European Court of Human Rights. Each chapter is devoted to an analysis of the substantive jurisprudence developed by these Courts to determine whether a challenged law is constitutional or not, and is written by members of these Courts who have had a prior academic career. The book highlights the similarities and differences in the analytical methods used by these courts in determining whether or not someone's constitutional rights have been violated. Students and scholars of constitutional law and human rights, judges and advocates engaged in constitutional litigation will find the book a unique and valuable resource.
Choose an application
Judicial review --- Rule of law --- Supremacy of law --- Administrative law --- Constitutional law --- Review, Judicial --- Courts --- Delegation of powers --- Executive power --- Judicial power --- Legislation --- Legislative power --- Separation of powers
Choose an application
Listing 1 - 6 of 6 |
Sort by
|