Narrow your search

Library

KU Leuven (2)

ULB (2)

ULiège (2)

KBR (1)

UAntwerpen (1)

UCLouvain (1)

UGent (1)


Resource type

book (4)


Language

English (4)


Year
From To Submit

2024 (1)

2020 (1)

2019 (2)

Listing 1 - 4 of 4
Sort by

Book
Values and Disorder in Mental Capacity Law.
Author:
ISBN: 9781009482110 1009482084 1009482114 1009482092 1009482076 Year: 2024 Publisher: Cambridge : Cambridge University Press,

Loading...
Export citation

Choose an application

Bookmark

Abstract

This inter-disciplinary book critiques the extent to which the Mental Capacity Act can deal adequately with the impact of mental disorder on autonomous decision-making. It will interest lawyers, legal scholars, medical practitioners, and policy makers working in this area, as well as students studying both law and medicine.

Keywords


Book
Parental rights, best interests and significant harms : medical decision-making on behalf of children post-Great Ormond Street Hospital v Gard
Authors: --- ---
ISBN: 1509924922 1509924906 Year: 2019 Publisher: Oxford, England : Hart,


Book
Parental rights, best interests and significant harms : medical decision-making on behalf of children post-Great Ormond Street Hospital v Gard
Authors: --- ---
ISBN: 1509924914 9781509924899 1509924892 9781509924899 1509924892 Year: 2019 Publisher: Oxford: Hart,

Loading...
Export citation

Choose an application

Bookmark

Abstract

"The question of whether and how decisions are made in respect of a child's medical treatment has become a matter of significant public controversy following the highly publicised cases of Charlie Gard (Great Ormond Street Hospital v Yates [2017]) and Alfie Evans (Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust v Evans et al [2018]). In light of this background, this timely collection brings together commentators from law, medical ethics and clinical medicine, actively drawing on the view from the clinic as well as philosophical, legal and sociological perspectives on the crucial question of who should decide about the fate of a child suffering from a serious illness. In particular, the collection looks at whether the current 'best interests' threshold is the appropriate boundary for legal intervention, or whether it is appropriate to adopt the 'risk of significant harm' approach proposed in Yates. Moreover, it explores the respective roles of parents, doctors and the courts and the possible risks of inappropriate state intrusion in parental decision-making, and how we might address them"


Book
Medical decision-making on behalf of young children : a comparative perspective
Authors: --- --- ---
ISBN: 9781509928569 9781509928576 9781509928583 9781509944545 1509944540 Year: 2020 Publisher: Oxford [etc.] Hart

Loading...
Export citation

Choose an application

Bookmark

Abstract

In the wake of the Charlie Gard and Alfie Evans cases, a wide-ranging international conversation was started regarding alternative thresholds for intervention and the different balances that can be made in weighing up the rights and interests of the child, the parent's rights and responsibilities and the role of medical professionals and the courts. This collection provides a comparative perspective on these issues by bringing together analysis from a range of jurisdictions across Europe, North and South America, Africa and Asia. Contextualising the differences and similarities, and drawing out the cultural and social values that inform the approach in different countries, this volume is highly valuable to scholars across jurisdictions, not only to inform their own local debate on how best to navigate such cases, but also to foster inter-jurisdictional debate on the issues. The book brings together commentators from the fields of law, medical ethics, and clinical medicine across the world, actively drawing on the view from the clinic as well as philosophical, legal and sociological perspectives on the crucial question of who should decide about the fate of a child suffering from a serious illness. In doing so, the collection offers comprehensive treatment of the key questions around whether the current best interests approach is still appropriate, and if not, what the alternatives are. It engages head-on with the concerns seen in both the academic and popular literature that there is a need to reconsider the orthodoxy in this area.

Listing 1 - 4 of 4
Sort by