Listing 1 - 10 of 62 | << page >> |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Choose an application
English language --- Grammar --- 801.56 --- Syntaxis. Semantiek --- 801.56 Syntaxis. Semantiek --- Grammar, Comparative and general --- Case --- Linguistics --- Philology
Choose an application
Choose an application
No detailed description available for "Linguistic Representation".
Stratificational grammar. --- Stratificational theory (Linguistics) --- Linguistic analogy --- Analogy --- Analogie (Taalwetenschap) --- Grammaire stratificationnaliste --- Grammaire stratificationnelle --- Stratificatie-grammatica --- Stratificatie-spraakkunst --- Stratificational grammar --- Analogy (Linguistics) --- Grammar, Comparative and general --- Linguistic analysis (Linguistics) --- Analysis, Linguistic (Linguistics) --- Comparative grammar --- Grammar --- Grammar, Philosophical --- Grammar, Universal --- Language and languages --- Philosophical grammar --- Grammar, Comparative --- Grammar, Comparative and general. --- Hierarchy (Linguistics) --- Linguistics --- Philology --- Analysis (Philosophy) --- Analogy (Linguistics). --- Linguistic analysis (Linguistics). --- Analogie (Linguistique) --- Grammaire comparée et générale --- Analyse linguistique (Linguistique) --- Grammar [Comparative and general ]
Choose an application
Namen (benamingen) --- Onomastiek --- Substantieven --- eigennamen --- Reference (Linguistics). --- Morfologie (taalkunde). --- Namen (benamingen). --- Morfologie. --- Onomastiek. --- Substantieven. --- eigennamen. --- Lexicology. Semantics --- Grammar --- Eigennamen --- Grammar, Comparative and general --- Onomastics. --- Semantiek. --- Syntaxis. --- Vergelijkende en algemene grammatica --- grammatica. --- Noun. --- Onomastics --- Reference (Linguistics) --- Signification (Linguistics) --- Linguistics --- Onomasiology --- Semantics --- Names --- Onomatology --- Language and languages --- Names, Personal --- Etymology --- Grammatica. --- Eigennamen.
Choose an application
This book presents an innovative theory of syntactic categories and the lexical classes they define. It revives the traditional idea that these are to be distinguished notionally (semantically). It allows for there to be peripheral members of a lexical class which may not obviously conform to the general definition. The author proposes a notation based on semantic features which accounts for the syntactic behaviour of classes. The book also presents a case for considering this classification - again in rather traditional vein - to be basic to determining the syntactic structure of sentences. Syntactic structure is thus erected in a very restricted fashion, without recourse to movement or empty elements.
Grammar, Comparative and general --- Semantics --- 801.56 --- Formal semantics --- Semasiology --- Semiology (Semantics) --- Comparative linguistics --- Information theory --- Language and languages --- Lexicology --- Meaning (Psychology) --- 801.56 Syntaxis. Semantiek --- Syntaxis. Semantiek --- Syntax --- Categories, Grammatical --- Grammatical categories --- Categorization (Linguistics) --- Componential analysis (Linguistics) --- Major form classes --- Lexicology. Semantics --- Grammar --- Grammatical categories. --- Syntax. --- Semantics. --- Grammaire comparée --- Sémantique --- Catégories grammaticales --- Syntaxe --- Syntaxe. --- Arts and Humanities --- Language & Linguistics --- Linguistics --- Philology --- Grammar, Comparative and general - Grammatical categories --- Grammar, Comparative and general - Syntax --- Grammar, Comparative and general Syntax
Choose an application
This grammar of English embraces major lexical, phonological, syntactic structures and interfaces. It is based on the substantive assumption: that the categories and structures at all levels represent mental substance, conceptual and/or perceptual. The adequacy of this assumption in expressing linguistic generalizations is tested. The lexicon is seen as central to the grammar; it contains signs with conceptual, or content, poles, minimally words, and perceptual, and expression, poles, segments. Both words and segments are differentiated by substance-based features. They determine the erection of syntactic and phonological structures at the interfaces from lexicon. The valencies of words, the identification of their semantically determined complements and modifiers, control the erection of syntactic structures in the form of dependency relations. However, the features of different segment types determines their placement in the syllable, or as prosodies. Despite this discrepancy, dependency and linearization are two of the analogical properties displayed by lexical, syntactic and phonological structure. Analogies among parts of the grammar are another consequence of substantiveness, as is the presence of figurativeness and iconicity.
English language --- Germanic languages --- Grammar. --- Dependency. --- Lexicalist. --- Structural Analogy.
Choose an application
This grammar of English embraces major lexical, phonological, syntactic structures and interfaces. It is based on the substantive assumption: that the categories and structures at all levels represent mental substance, conceptual and/or perceptual. The adequacy of this assumption in expressing linguistic generalizations is tested. The lexicon is seen as central to the grammar; it contains signs with conceptual, or content, poles, minimally words, and perceptual, and expression, poles, segments. Both words and segments are differentiated by substance-based features. They determine the erection of syntactic and phonological structures at the interfaces from lexicon. The valencies of words, the identification of their semantically determined complements and modifiers, control the erection of syntactic structures in the form of dependency relations. However, the features of different segment types determines their placement in the syllable, or as prosodies. Despite this discrepancy, dependency and linearization are two of the analogical properties displayed by lexical, syntactic and phonological structure. Analogies among parts of the grammar are another consequence of substantiveness, as is the presence of figurativeness and iconicity.
Choose an application
Choose an application
Listing 1 - 10 of 62 | << page >> |
Sort by
|