Choose an application
Human rights --- International law --- Juristic persons --- Personnes morales --- Acteurs non étatiques (relations internationales) --- Organisations non gouvernementales --- Juristic persons. --- International business enterprises --- Artificial persons --- Conventional persons --- Legal persons --- Persons, Artificial --- Persons, Conventional --- Persons, Juristic --- Persons, Legal --- Persons (Law) --- Corporation law --- Basic rights --- Civil rights (International law) --- Rights, Human --- Rights of man --- Human security --- Transitional justice --- Truth commissions --- Law and legislation --- Human Rights --- Human rights. --- Law and legislation. --- Droits de l'homme --- Droits de l'homme (Droit international) --- Entreprises multinationales --- Droit --- Droits de l'homme. --- Organisations non gouvernementales. --- International business enterprises - Law and legislation
Choose an application
Travailler avec le concept de genre est porteur de critique sociale. De nombreuses organisations féministes du Sud revendiquent et encouragent la voie de l'empowerment des femmes. Cette approche peut être définie comme le développement des capacités de négociation pour un partage équitable et un exercice différent du pouvoir ; elle cherche à promouvoir, non seulement le partage du pouvoir, mais des changements allant dans le sens de leur vision d'une société, avec un plus grande justice sociale et des rapports plus équitables entre hommes et femmes.
Développement, Tiers-Monde --- Human rights --- Sociology of the family. Sociology of sexuality --- Political sociology --- Developing countries --- Women --- Sex role --- Sex discrimination against women --- Power (Social sciences) --- Social justice --- Social conditions --- Rôle selon le sexe --- Femmes --- Pouvoir (Sciences sociales) --- Conditions sociales --- Sex role. --- Women - Social conditions - Cross-cultural studies --- Sex role - Cross-cultural studies --- Sex discrimination against women - Cross-cultural studies --- échanges mondiaux --- acteurs non étatiques et société civile --- politiques et pratiques du développement --- économie politique --- relations hommes-femmes --- citoyenneté --- empowerment --- développement --- féminisme --- division sexuelle du travail --- femmes --- administration publique
Choose an application
"State Responsibility for the Support of Armed Groups in the Commission of International Crimes examines the law on attribution of conduct of individuals to states. Under established principles of international law, State responsibility only arises where armed groups act under the direction or control of the State, or are completely dependent on the State. These tests are under inclusive as they do not consider the different ways states can exert control over armed groups in the commission of international crimes. Ramsundar presents an interesting examination into the possibility of liberalization of the rules of State responsibility. The examination considers subtle ways states can exert control over armed groups in the commission of international crimes. Her proposal presents a compelling argument for widening the scope of responsibility to states through useful modifications to interpretation of the tests of control and dependence"
Non-state actors (International relations) --- Government liability (International law) --- Acteurs non étatiques (relations internationales) --- État --- Responsabilité (droit international) --- Criminal jurisdiction --- Droit pénal international --- Groupes armés non-étatiques --- Conflits armés non internationaux --- NGAs (International relations) --- Non-governmental actors (International relations) --- Nongovernmental actors (International relations) --- Non-state entities (International relations) --- Nonstate entities (International relations) --- Nonstate actors (International relations) --- Associations, institutions, etc. --- International relations --- Acteurs non étatiques (relations internationales) --- État --- Droit pénal international --- Groupes armés non-étatiques --- Conflits armés non internationaux --- Responsabilité (droit international)
Choose an application
"The book grapples with the applicability and application of international human rights law in geographic areas where the State that is recognised as the sovereign of the territory (territorial State) has lost effective control over a part of its territory. Such a situation raises difficult questions in terms of the applicability of international law and international human rights law, especially since the latter traditionally imposes obligations on the territorial State, presumed as exercising effective control over its entire territory,The book grapples with the applicability and application of international human rights law in geographic areas where the State that is recognised as the sovereign of the territory (territorial State) has lost effective control over a part of its territory. Such a situation raises difficult questions in terms of the applicability of international law and international human rights law, especially since the latter traditionally imposes obligations on the territorial State, presumed as exercising effective control over its entire territory, while it does not foresee express provisions in situations where the territorial State has lost control over part of its territory. This does not mean that these situations bring about an international regulatory vacuum. In fact, other actors exercise effective control over the territory of which obligations are not expressly addressed by international human rights law instruments. These actors include other States (outside States) controlling the territory in an invasion phase; situations of belligerent occupation; territorial lease; international organisations in peace operations, especially within the framework of an international territorial administration; and non-state de facto regimes, issued from an armed group consolidating its effective territorial control. while it does not foresee express provisions in situations where the territorial State has lost control over part of its territory. This does not mean that these situations bring about an international regulatory vacuum. In fact, other actors exercise effective control over the territory of which obligations are not expressly addressed by international human rights law instruments. These actors include other States (outside States) controlling the territory in an invasion phase; situations of belligerent occupation; territorial lease; international organisations in peace operations, especially within the framework of an international territorial administration; and non-state de facto regimes, issued from an armed group consolidating its effective territorial control"--
Humanitarian law --- Non-state actors (International relations) --- De facto doctrine. --- Military occupation. --- Belligerent occupation --- De facto doctrine (International law) --- Occupation, Military --- Occupied territory --- Armed Forces in foreign countries --- War (International law) --- Conquest, Right of --- Military government --- De facto government --- Constitutional law --- Recognition (International law) --- NGAs (International relations) --- Non-governmental actors (International relations) --- Nongovernmental actors (International relations) --- Non-state entities (International relations) --- Nonstate entities (International relations) --- Nonstate actors (International relations) --- Associations, institutions, etc. --- International relations --- Humanitarian conventions --- International humanitarian law --- Humanitarian law. --- Non-state actors (International relations). --- Human rights --- Droits de l'homme --- Droit humanitaire --- Occupation militaire --- Reconnaissance (droit international) --- Acteurs non étatiques (relations internationales) --- Acteurs non étatiques (relations internationales)
Choose an application
It is generally accepted that detention in armed conflicts is an inevitable security measure that all warring parties use extensively in their daily operations. In such violent contexts, the legal protection afforded to detainees may be lifesaving. International humanitarian law (IHL) treaties recognise this reality in international armed conflicts by incorporating safeguards from unlawful and arbitrary detention in formulated legal grounds and procedural guarantees that the detaining powers are obliged to follow. The same guarantees are, however, not afforded to people affected by non-international armed conflicts under IHL. Instead, in the absence of a clearly defined international normative framework, security detention remains among the least regulated aspects of military behaviour in this type of armed conflict.
Civil war --- Non-state actors (International relations) --- Detention of persons. --- Prisoners of war --- Ukraine Conflict, 2014 --- -Afghan War, 2001-2021 --- Guerre --- Acteurs non étatiques (relations internationales) --- Détention de personnes --- Prisonniers de guerre --- Guerre du Donbass (2014-....) --- Protection of civilians. --- Legal status, laws, etc. --- Law and legislation. --- Protection des civils --- Statut juridique --- Syria --- Afghanistan --- Syrie --- History --- Ethnic conflict --- Political violence --- Violence --- Political crimes and offenses --- Terrorism --- Conflict, Ethnic --- Ethnic violence --- Inter-ethnic conflict --- Interethnic conflict --- Ethnic relations --- Social conflict --- Humanitarian law. --- Droit humanitaire --- Acteurs non étatiques (relations internationales) --- Détention de personnes
Choose an application
When we speak of global governance today, we no longer mean simply state-to-state diplomacy, international treaties, or intergovernmental organizations like the United Nations. Alongside these traditional' elements of global politics are a host of new institutions ranging from global networks of governmental officials, to private codes of conduct for corporations, to action-oriented partnerships of NGOs, governments, corporations, and other actors. These innovative mechanisms offer intriguing solutions to pressing transnational challenges as diverse as climate change, financial governance, workers' rights, and public health. But they also raise new questions about the effectiveness and legitimacy of transnational governance. An expanding body of scholarship has sought to identify and assess these new forms of governance, but this young body of work has lacked a sense of the larger picture. This volume seeks to fill that need by presenting a comprehensive overview of new forms of transnational governance. This resource is essential for those who want to explain why transborder governance has changed and to understand what implications these changes have for global politics.
International relations. Foreign policy --- Political science --- Foreign relations --- Science politique --- Relations extérieures --- International organization --- International Cooperation --- Non-state actors (International relations) --- International cooperation. --- International organization. --- International relations --- Organisation internationale --- Coopération internationale --- Relations internationales --- Acteurs non étatiques (Relations internationales) --- #SBIB:327.7H01 --- #SBIB:327.1H10 --- Grondslagen, principes, evolutie internationale gemeenschap --- Internationale betrekkingen: theorieën --- Non-state actors (International relations). --- Coopération internationale --- Acteurs non étatiques (Relations internationales) --- International cooperation --- NGAs (International relations) --- Non-governmental actors (International relations) --- Nongovernmental actors (International relations) --- Non-state entities (International relations) --- Nonstate entities (International relations) --- Nonstate actors (International relations) --- Associations, institutions, etc. --- Federation, International --- Global governance --- Interdependence of nations --- International administration --- International federation --- Organization, International --- World federation --- World government --- World order --- World organization --- Congresses and conventions --- Peace --- International agencies --- Security, International --- World politics --- Cooperation, International --- Institutions, International --- International institutions --- Cooperation
Choose an application
Since they were pioneered in the 1970s by Robert Keohane and others, the broad range of neoliberal institutionalist theories of international relations have grown in importance. In an increasingly globalized world, the realist and neorealist focus on states, military power, conflict, and anarchy has more and more given way to a recognition of the importance of nonstate actors, nonmilitary forms of power, interdependence, international institutions, and cooperation. Drawing together a group of leading international relations theorists, this book explores the frontiers of new research on the role of such forces in world politics. The topics explored in these chapters include the uneven role of peacekeepers in civil wars, the success of human rights treaties in promoting women's rights, the disproportionate power of developing countries in international environmental policy negotiations, and the prospects for Asian regional cooperation. While all of the chapters demonstrate the empirical and theoretical vitality of liberal and institutionalist theories, they also highlight weaknesses that should drive future research and influence the reform of foreign policy and international organizations. In addition to the editors, the contributors are Vinod Aggarawal, Jonathan Aronson, Elizabeth DeSombre, Page Fortna, Michael Gilligan, Lisa Martin, Timothy McKeown, Ronald Mitchell, Layna Mosley, Beth Simmons, Randall Stone, and Ann Tickner.
Non-governmental organizations. --- International agencies. --- International relations. --- Organisations non-gouvernementales --- Organisations internationales --- Relations internationales --- Non-governmental organizations --- International agencies --- International relations --- Organisations non gouvernementales --- Acteurs non étatiques (relations internationales) --- #SBIB:327.7H01 --- #SBIB:327.7H06 --- Coexistence --- Foreign affairs --- Foreign policy --- Foreign relations --- Global governance --- Interdependence of nations --- International affairs --- Peaceful coexistence --- World order --- National security --- Sovereignty --- World politics --- Associations, International --- IGOs (Intergovernmental organizations) --- Institutions, International --- Intergovernmental organizations --- International administration --- International associations --- International governmental organizations --- International institutions --- International organizations --- International unions --- Organizations, International --- Specialized agencies of the United Nations --- International cooperation --- Interorganizational relations --- Non-state actors (International relations) --- International organization --- INGOs (International agencies) --- International non-governmental organizations --- NGOs (International agencies) --- Nongovernmental organizations --- Organizations, Non-governmental (International agencies) --- Private and voluntary organizations (International agencies) --- PVOs (International agencies) --- Nonprofit organizations --- Grondslagen, principes, evolutie internationale gemeenschap --- Internationale organisatietheorieën --- Organisations non gouvernementales. --- Organisations internationales. --- Inter-governmental organizations
Choose an application
Papacy (International law) --- Sovereignty. --- 262.132 --- Wereldlijke macht van de paus. Pauselijke staten. Vaticaanstad --- Église catholique --- Relations extérieures --- 262.132 Wereldlijke macht van de paus. Pauselijke staten. Vaticaanstad --- Droit international --- Souveraineté --- Acteurs non étatiques (relations internationales) --- Gouvernement --- Vatican --- Politique et gouvernement --- Sovereignty --- State sovereignty (International relations) --- International law --- Political science --- Common heritage of mankind (International law) --- International relations --- Self-determination, National --- Law and legislation --- Catholic Church --- Foreign relations --- Treaties. --- Diplomatie pontificale --- Droit international. --- Souveraineté. --- Gouvernement. --- Politique et gouvernement. --- Church of Rome --- Roman Catholic Church --- Katholische Kirche --- Katolyt︠s︡ʹka t︠s︡erkva --- Römisch-Katholische Kirche --- Römische Kirche --- Ecclesia Catholica --- Eglise catholique --- Eglise catholique-romaine --- Katolicheskai︠a︡ t︠s︡erkovʹ --- Chiesa cattolica --- Iglesia Católica --- Kościół Katolicki --- Katolicki Kościół --- Kościół Rzymskokatolicki --- Nihon Katorikku Kyōkai --- Katholikē Ekklēsia --- Gereja Katolik --- Kenesiyah ha-Ḳatolit --- Kanisa Katoliki --- כנסיה הקתולית --- כנסייה הקתולית --- 가톨릭교 --- 천주교
Choose an application
Autrefois décidées dans la seule sphère étatique, les politiques d’immigration et d’asile connaissent depuis la fin des années 1980 un processus d’européanisation. Bien qu’incomplet, celui-ci devient néanmoins une réalité observable dans les législations, les pratiques et les discours. Parmi les acteurs concernés par ces changements figurent les associations nationales de défense des étrangers. Dans cette nouvelle « gouvernance multiniveaux », comment ces associations s’adaptent-elles ? Ce eCahier envisage les évolutions stratégiques, idéologiques et structurelles des associations françaises. Celles-ci intègrent les dispositions de l’européanisation, soit pour les contester, soit pour les utiliser face à l’Etat. Ce dernier demeure en effet la cible et le référent principal des mobilisations. Léa Breton montre également que ces questions peuvent être reliées d’une manière plus large à certains aspects évolutifs de la notion de politique et d’espace public européen.
Military & Naval Science --- Law, Politics & Government --- Armies --- Europe --- France --- Defenses. --- Foreign relations --- Bro-C'hall --- Fa-kuo --- Fa-lan-hsi --- Faguo --- Falanxi --- Falanxi Gongheguo --- Faransā --- Farānsah --- França --- Francia (Republic) --- Francija --- Francja --- Francland --- Francuska --- Franis --- Franḳraykh --- Frankreich --- Frankrig --- Frankrijk --- Frankrike --- Frankryk --- Fransa --- Fransa Respublikası --- Franse --- Franse Republiek --- Frant︠s︡ --- Frant︠s︡ Uls --- Frant︠s︡ii︠a︡ --- Frantsuzskai︠a︡ Rėspublika --- Frantsyi︠a︡ --- Franza --- French Republic --- Frencisc Cynewīse --- Frenska republika --- Furansu --- Furansu Kyōwakoku --- Gallia --- Gallia (Republic) --- Gallikē Dēmokratia --- Hyãsia --- Parancis --- Peurancih --- Phransiya --- Pransiya --- Pransya --- Prantsusmaa --- Pʻŭrangsŭ --- Ranska --- República Francesa --- Republica Franzesa --- Republika Francuska --- Republiḳah ha-Tsarfatit --- Republikang Pranses --- République française --- Tsarfat --- Tsorfat --- Γαλλική Δημοκρατία --- Γαλλία --- Франц --- Франц Улс --- Французская Рэспубліка --- Францыя --- Франция --- Френска република --- פראנקרייך --- צרפת --- רפובליקה הצרפתית --- فرانسه --- فرنسا --- フランス --- フランス共和国 --- 法国 --- 法蘭西 --- 法蘭西共和國 --- 프랑스 --- France (Provisional government, 1944-1946) --- politiques de migration --- acteurs non étatiques et société civile --- accord de Schengen --- droits humains --- migrations et réfugiés --- frontière | territoire
Choose an application
Non- State actors, principally corporations and international organizations, as well as foreign States, influence decision-making. This reality particularly affects the enjoyment and implementation of economic, social and cultural (ESC) rights.Alongside what has become a fast-moving reality, legal developments in the field of ESC rights are also happening at a fast pace. In the last decade we have not only witnessed the end of the ESC justiciability debate, including a growing recognition of these rights at the domestic level, but also the adoption of an international complaints procedure to deal with violations of ESC rights (OP-ICESCR). Yet, these legal developments fall short of providing accountability in a globalized world.There is a discrepancy between international human rights law – with its focus on the territorial State – and the current globalized context in which non-state actors and foreign States also affect the enjoyment of ESC rights. Scholars have argued for the expansion of the duty-bearer side of human rights law in order ‘to synch’ human rights law with reality. Most of the research in the last decade has focused on the recognition of the obligations of foreign States and NSAs, less so on subsequent rules for the attribution and distribution of obligations, responsibility, and remedies. What are the (legal) building blocks or foundations of a multi-duty-bearer accountability framework?This book consists of three parts. In part I the book provides the reader with a solid understanding of the concept of accountability and the challenges it implies for the protection of human rights. Part II reviews the various accountability procedures in the international and regional human rights systems.It details the existence of any procedural and substantive provisions found in the procedures that present prospects or hurdles for the scrutiny of extraterritorial or transnational obligations. Part III turns to a normative, prescriptive outlook as it examines the procedural adaptations needed to facilitate the expansion of the duty-bearer side of human rights law.
Human rights --- Droits de l'homme (droit international) --- Droits économiques et sociaux --- Obligation de rendre compte (administration publique) --- Acteurs non gouvernementaux (Relations internationales) --- Acteurs non étatiques (relations internationales) --- Droit international et droits de l'homme --- Droits de l'homme et droit international --- Droits de l'homme et mondialisation --- Globalisering en mensenrechten --- Globalization and human rights --- Human rights and globalization --- Human rights and international law --- Internationaal recht en mensenrechten --- International law and human rights --- Liability for human rights violations --- Mensenrechten en globalisering --- Mensenrechten en internationaal recht --- Mondialisation et droits de l'homme --- NGAs (International relations) --- Niet-gouvernementele actoren (Internationale betrekkingen) --- Niet-statelijke actoren (Internationale betrekkingen) --- Non gouvernementaux [Acteurs ] (Relations internationales) --- Non étatiques [Acteurs ] (Relations internationales) --- Non-governmental actors (International relations) --- Non-state actors (International relations) --- Non-state entities (International relations) --- Nongovernmental actors (International relations) --- Nonstate actors (International relations) --- Nonstate entities (International relations) --- Verantwoordelijkheid voor de schending van de mensenrechten --- Violation des droits de l'homme -- Responsabilité --- Droits économiques et sociaux. --- International law and human rights. --- Non-state actors (International relations). --- Human rights and globalization. --- Liability for human rights violations. --- Human rights. --- Right of intervention. --- United Nations Organization. --- Application of laws. --- Theses. --- Droits de l'homme. --- Droit d'ingérence. --- Organisation des Nations unies. --- Application des lois. --- Thèses. --- 86.81 human rights. --- Droits économiques et sociaux.