Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

AGRO-ECOLOGY --- AGRICULTURAL POLICIES --- AGRICULTURE --- ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE --- AGRICULTURAL POLICIES --- RECOMMENDATIONS --- ESSAYS --- ANALYSIS --- ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE --- RECOMMENDATIONS --- AGRO-ECOLOGY --- AGRICULTURAL POLICIES --- AGRICULTURE --- ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE --- AGRICULTURAL POLICIES --- RECOMMENDATIONS --- ESSAYS --- ANALYSIS --- ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE --- RECOMMENDATIONS

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Mental health care increasingly faces a challenge to be 'evidence based'. However, despite much policy activity in the UK, it's still not clear what sort of evidence researchers should be producing for mental health services, or what purchasers should be looking for. Evidence in Mental Health Care evaluates a range of different research methodologies and types of 'evidence', and includes:* a historical and conceptual analysis of what was regarded as evidence in the past, and what impact it has had in mental health care* a presentation of different methodological approaches, and a discussion of their strengths and weaknesses in providing evidence* how evidence is applied in different treatment and care modalities* different angles on the way forward for providing appropriate evidence to improve current mental health care.Evidence in Mental Health Care will prove vital for the successful extension of evidence-based evaluation to mental health services in general. It will be essential reading for researchers, students and practitioners across the range of mental health disciplines, health service managers and purchasers of services.

WM 30 Administrative psychiatry --- Evidence-Based Medicine --- Mental Health Services --- Mental Disorders --- Medicine, Evidence-Based --- Evidence Based Medicine --- Medicine, Evidence Based --- Decision Support Techniques --- Clinical Medicine --- Evidence-Based Dentistry --- Evidence-Based Nursing --- Behavior Disorders --- Diagnosis, Psychiatric --- Mental Disorders, Severe --- Psychiatric Diagnosis --- Disorder, Mental --- Disorder, Severe Mental --- Disorders, Behavior --- Disorders, Mental --- Disorders, Severe Mental --- Mental Disorder --- Mental Disorder, Severe --- Severe Mental Disorder --- Severe Mental Disorders --- Mentally Ill Persons --- Evidence-Based Medicine. --- Psychiatric Diseases --- Psychiatric Disorders --- Psychiatric Illness --- Psychiatric Disease --- Psychiatric Disorder --- Psychiatric Illnesses --- Mental Illness --- Illness, Mental --- Mental Illnesses

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Russia's 2014 annexation of Crimea and military operations in Eastern Ukraine have prompted renewed discussion about the possibility of a Russian attack on a North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) ally, particularly in the Baltics. Many analysts have raised questions about whether NATO members would respond militarily to such an attack. This report contributes to U.S. defense planning by identifying 13 key factors that are likely to affect each member's decision to participate in a military response to either an unconventional or conventional Russian attack. Based on this analysis, the report recommends ways to reduce allies' vulnerability to Russian influence and increase alliance cohesion.