Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Public health --- Santé publique --- Research. --- Recherche

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Public health --- Santé publique --- Congrès

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Delivery of Health Care --- Public Health --- Health insurance --- Medical economics --- Medical policy --- Public health --- Social medicine --- Assurance-maladie --- Economie de la santé --- Politique sanitaire --- Santé publique --- Médecine sociale --- periodicals. --- periodicals. --- Periodicals --- Periodicals. --- Periodicals --- Periodicals --- Periodicals. --- Périodiques --- Périodiques --- Périodiques --- Périodiques --- Périodiques --- Milbank Memorial Fund --- Periodicals. --- EJSANTE EJSOCIA EPUB-ALPHA-M EPUB-PER-FT JSTOR-E MDHOSPIT MDPUBLIC MDSOCMED

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

The idea that we have an unlimited moral imperative to pursue medical research is deeply rooted in American society and medicine. In this provocative work, Daniel Callahan exposes the ways in which such a seemingly high and humane ideal can be corrupted and distorted into a harmful practice. Medical research, with its power to attract money and political support, and its promise of cures for a wide range of medical burdens, has good and bad sides-which are often indistinguishable. In What Price Better Health?, Callahan teases out the distinctions and differences, revealing the difficulties that result when the research imperative is suffused with excessive zeal, adulterated by the profit motive, or used to justify cutting moral corners. Exploring the National Institutes of Health's annual budget, the inflated estimates of health care cost savings that result from research, the high prices charged by drug companies, the use and misuse of human subjects for medical testing, and the controversies surrounding human cloning and stem cell research, Callahan clarifies the fine line between doing good and doing harm in the name of medical progress. His work shows that medical research must be understood in light of other social and economic needs and how even the research imperative, dedicated to the highest human good, has its limits.

Morals --- Ethics, Research --- Research --- Medicine --- Health Workforce --- Laboratory Research --- Research Activities --- Research and Development --- Research Priorities --- Activities, Research --- Activity, Research --- Development and Research --- Priorities, Research --- Priority, Research --- Research Activity --- Research Priority --- Research, Laboratory --- Research Ethics --- Human Experimentation --- Animal Experimentation --- Embryo Research --- Fetal Research --- Morality --- Retrospective Moral Judgment --- Social aspects --- ethics --- american medicine. --- american society. --- annual budgets. --- bioethics. --- boundaries of science. --- capitalist society. --- controversial. --- drug companies. --- economic needs. --- health care costs. --- health care system. --- health researchers. --- human cloning. --- human subjects. --- limits of research. --- medical burdens. --- medical progress. --- medical research. --- medical testing. --- moral issues. --- morality. --- political history. --- profit motives. --- research imperative. --- social needs. --- sociology. --- stem cell research.