Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

This paper evaluates the effects of the FAMEX export promotion program in Tunisia on the performance of beneficiary firms. While much of the literature assesses only the short-term impact of such programs, the paper considers also the longer-term impact. Propensity-score matching, difference-in-difference, and weighted least squares estimates suggest that beneficiaries initially see faster export growth and greater diversification across destination markets and products. However, three years after the intervention, the growth rates and the export levels of beneficiaries are not significantly different from those of non-beneficiary firms. Exports of beneficiaries do remain more diversified, but the diversification does not translate into lower volatility of exports. The authors also did not find evidence that the program produced spillover benefits for non-beneficiary firms. However, the results on the longer-term impact of export promotion must be interpreted cautiously because the later years of the sample period saw a collapse in world trade, which may not have affected all firms equally.

E-Business --- Economic Theory & Research --- Export margins --- Export promotion --- Firms --- Impact evaluation --- International Economics & Trade --- Labor Policies --- Macroeconomics and Economic Growth --- Matching grant --- Microfinance --- Propensity-score matching --- Small Scale Enterprise --- Tunisia

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

The focus of trade policy has shifted in recent years from economy-wide reductions in tariffs and trade restrictions toward targeted interventions to facilitate trade and promote exports. Most of these latter interventions are based on the new mantra of "aid-for-trade" rather than on hard evidence on what works and what does not. On the one hand, rigorous impact-evaluation is needed to justify these interventions and to improve their design. On the other hand, rigorous evaluation is feasible because unlike traditional trade policy, these interventions tend to be targeted and so it is possible to construct treatment and control groups. When interventions are not targeted, such as in the case of customs reforms, some techniques, such as randomized control trials, may not be feasible but meaningful evaluation may still be possible. Theis paper discusses examples of impact evaluations using a range of methods (experimental and non-experimental), highlighting the particular issues and caveats arising in a trade context, and the valuable lessons that are already being learned. The authors argue that systematically building impact evaluation into trade projects could lead to better policy design and a more credible case for "aid-for-trade.

Aid for trade --- Economic Theory & Research --- Export promotion --- Free Trade --- Impact evaluation --- International Economics & Trade --- Poverty Monitoring & Analysis --- Propensity-score matching --- Randomized control trials --- Trade competitiveness --- Trade facilitation --- Trade Policy --- Transport Economics Policy & Planning

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

E-books

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

The demand for accountability in aid-for-trade is increasing but monitoring has focused on case studies and impressionistic narratives. The paper reviews recent evidence from a wide range of studies, recognizing that a multiplicity of approaches is needed to learn what works and what does not. The review concludes that there is some support for the emphasis on reducing trade costs through investments in hard infrastructure (like ports and roads) and soft infrastructure (like customs). But failure to implement complementary reform-especially the introduction of competition in transport services-may erode the benefits of these investments. Direct support to exporters does seem to lead to diversification across products and destinations, but it is not yet clear that these benefits are durable. In general, it is difficult to rely on cross-country studies to direct aid-for-trade. More rigorous impact evaluation is an underutilized alternative, but situations of clinical interventions in trade are rare and adverse incentives (because of agency problems) and costs (because of the small size of project) are a hurdle in implementation.

Aid For Trade (AFT) --- Common Carriers Industry --- Economic Theory & Research --- Free Trade --- Gravity --- Impact Evaluation --- Industry --- International Economics & Trade --- Macroeconomics and Economic Growth --- Trade Performance --- Transport --- Transport and Trade Logistics --- Transport Economics, Policy & Planning