Listing 1 - 3 of 3 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
We all have moral beliefs. But what if one beleif conflicts with another? DePaul argues that we have to make our beliefs cohere, but that the current coherence methods are seriously flawed. It is not just the arguments that need to be considered in moral enquiry. DePaul asserts that the ability to make sensitive moral judgements is vital to any philosophical inquiry into morality. The inquirer must consider how her life experiences and experiences with literature, film and theatre have influenced her capacity for making moral judgments and attempt to ensure that this capacity is neither naive
Choose an application
Knowledge, Theory of. --- Truth. --- Conviction --- Belief and doubt --- Philosophy --- Skepticism --- Certainty --- Necessity (Philosophy) --- Pragmatism --- Epistemology --- Theory of knowledge --- Psychology --- Foundationalism (Theory of knowledge) --- Knowledge, Theory of
Choose an application
The idea of a virtue has traditionally been important in ethics, but only recently has gained attention as an idea that can explain how we ought to form beliefs as well as how we ought to act. Moral philosophers and epistemologists have different approaches to the idea of intellectual virtue; here, Michael DePaul and Linda Zagzebski bring work from both fields together for the first time to address all of the important issues. It will be required reading for anyone working in either field. - ;Virtue ethics has attracted a lot of attention over the past few decades, and more recently there has
General ethics --- Theory of knowledge --- Virtue epistemology. --- Virtue. --- Philosophy --- Philosophy & Religion --- Speculative Philosophy --- Virtue epistemology --- Virtue --- Epistemic virtue --- Epistemology, Virtue --- Knowledge, Theory of --- Conduct of life --- Ethics --- Human acts
Listing 1 - 3 of 3 |
Sort by
|