Listing 1 - 10 of 37 | << page >> |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Grammar --- 801.56 --- Syntaxis. Semantiek --- Arc pair grammar. --- Grammar, Comparative and general --- Relational grammar. --- Clauses. --- Passive voice. --- 801.56 Syntaxis. Semantiek --- Arc pair grammar --- Relational grammar --- Passive voice --- Voice, Passive --- Clauses --- Grammar, Arc pair --- Grammar, Relational --- Generative grammar --- Voice --- Sentences --- Syntax --- Linguistics --- Philology
Choose an application
For some time it has been generally accepted by students of English grammar that a rule of Raising exists and that it functions to produce derived main clause subjects. Following Rosenbaum's work, it has also been widely accepted that this rule functions in a specified class of cases to derive main clause objects. However, in recent work, Chomsky has rejected the view that there is any Raising rule that produces derived main clause objects. According to his latest position, only the derived subject function of the rule is an actual feature of English grammar. On Raising is highly critical and is devoted chiefly to supporting the claim that English does contain a rule of Raising-a rule that has the function of taking the complement subject noun phrase in certain complement constructions and reassigning it as a constituent of the main clause. The author presents something on the order of two dozen arguments that Raising produces derived objects. In the course of this discussion, he also considers various other theoretical and descriptive consequences of, and questions raised by, the existence of Raising.
English language --- Grammar --- Sentences --- Grammar, Generative --- Anglais (langue) --- Phrase --- Grammaire générative --- Grammar, Generative. --- -English language --- -Germanic languages --- Sentences. --- -Grammar, Generative --- Generative grammar --- Phrase. --- Grammaire générative. --- Germanic languages --- English language - Sentences --- English language - Grammar, Generative --- Grammaire générative.
Choose an application
French language --- Grammar --- Français (Langue) --- Word order --- Syntax --- Ordre des mots --- Syntaxe --- 804.0-56 --- -French language --- -Langue d'oïl --- Romance languages --- Frans: syntaxis; semantiek --- Syntax. --- Word order. --- -Frans: syntaxis; semantiek --- 804.0-56 Frans: syntaxis; semantiek --- -804.0-56 Frans: syntaxis; semantiek --- Langue d'oïl --- Français (Langue)
Choose an application
This volume consists of an introduction and two groups of essays by Paul M. Postal, each with a connecting theme. The first, positive group of papers, contains five previously unpublished studies of English syntax. These include a long study of so-called "locative inversion," two investigations related to raising to non-subject status, an argument for the existence of a hitherto ignored nominal grammatical category and a study of vulgar negative polarity items. Each investigation of specific English details is argued to have significant theoretical consequences. The second, negative group of papers, contains seven essays each of which seeks to show that aspects of contemporary linguistic activity are in part contaminated by elements of what is called "junk linguistics." Postal uses the term to denote work which advances proposals, puts forward claims and asserts deep results which, he argues, can only be accepted by ignoring serious standards of inquiry and scholarship. Postal claims that much of this work is nonetheless currently considered not only serious but prestigious reveals the problem to exist at the core of the field, not its periphery. These chapters include documentation of "junk linguistic" aspects in National Science Foundation refereeing, work on the foundations of linguistics, and even in widespread terminological usages. The final chapter briefly lists personal suggestions for dealing with this problem.
English language --- Grammar --- Engels: syntaxis; semantiek --- 802.0-56 Engels: syntaxis; semantiek --- 802.0-56 --- Grammar, Comparative and general --- Linguistic analysis (Linguistics) --- Analysis, Linguistic (Linguistics) --- Analysis (Philosophy) --- Comparative grammar --- Grammar, Philosophical --- Grammar, Universal --- Language and languages --- Philosophical grammar --- Linguistics --- Philology --- Syntax --- Grammar, Comparative --- Chomsky, Noam. --- Grammar, Comparative and general. --- Linguistic analysis (Linguistics). --- Syntax. --- Anglais (langue) --- Analyse linguistique --- Syntaxe --- Chomsky, Noam --- Oeuvre --- Syntaxe. --- Oeuvre. --- Chomsky, Abraham Noam --- Germanic languages
Choose an application
In this volume, Paul Postal rejects the notion that an English phrase of the form [V + DP] invariably involves a grammatical relation properly chracterized as a 'direct object'. He argues instead that at least three distinct relations occur in such a structure.
Grammar, Comparative and general --- English language --- Syntax. --- Clauses. --- Clauses --- Language and languages --- Syntax --- Sentences --- LINGUISTICS & LANGUAGE/General --- Grammar --- Germanic languages --- Linguistics --- Philology --- Grammar, Comparative and general Syntax
Choose an application
Choose an application
Choose an application
Choose an application
Choose an application
Listing 1 - 10 of 37 | << page >> |
Sort by
|