Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

In the prevailing liberal ethos, if there is one thing that is beyond the reach of others, it is our body in particular, and our person in general: our legal and political tradition is such that we have the right to deny others access to our person and body, even though doing so would harm those who need personal services from us, or body parts. However, we lack the right to use ourselves as we wish in order to raise income, even though we do not necessarily harm others by doingso---even though we might in fact benefit them by doing so. C--eacute--;cile Fabre's aim in this book is to show that, according to the principles of distributive justice which inform most liberal democracies, both in practice and in theory, it should be exactly the other way around: that is, if it is true that we lack the right to withhold access to material resources from those who need them, we also lack the right to withhold access to our body from those who need it; but we do, under some circumstances, have the right to decide how to use it in orderto raise income. More specifically, she argues in favour of the confiscation of body parts and personal services, as well as of the commercialization of organs, sex, and reproductive capacities.

Status of persons --- Human rights --- Professional ethics. Deontology --- Legal theory and methods. Philosophy of law --- Surrogate mothers --- Gestational mothers --- Host mothers --- Uterine mothers --- Good Samaritan laws --- Assistance in emergencies. --- Personality (Law). --- Assistance in emergencies --- Human body --- Personality (Law) --- Transplantation of organs, tissues, etc --- Medical laws and legislation --- Mothers --- Law and legislation --- Legal status, laws, etc --- Body, Human --- Law and legislation. --- Legal status, laws, etc.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Those in favour of social rights do not usually reflect on the implications of their arguments for democracy and vice versa. This book illustrates the conflict between the demands of democracy and those of social rights.

Democracy. --- Social justice. --- Equality --- Justice --- Self-government --- Political science --- Representative government and representation --- Republics

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Corpus linguistique --- Linguistique --- Informatique

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

"There is no shortage of criticisms of governments' responses to Covid-19. Surely, we can respond better to the next pandemic. But how? What lessons for the future can we learn from responses to Covid-19? Some elements of adequate preparation for the next pandemic are straightforward and uncontroversial, such as adequate stockpiling of medical supplies, more vigorous efforts to encourage and coordinate vaccine research, improving healthcare infrastructures to function under the stress of a pandemic, developing capacity for vaccine production in less affluent countries, improving early reporting of the emergence of new infectious diseases, and providing more timely, more effective, and better coordinated aid to under-resourced countries. This book identifies institutional failures to explain the substantive flaws of Covid-19 pandemic policies, and then proposes institutional reforms that would reduce the risk that similar institutional failures will occur in the future. Preparation for the next pandemic requires significant institutional change at the national and international levels"--

COVID-19 (Disease) --- COVID-19 Pandemic, 2020-2023. --- Emergency management