Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

International arbitration has enjoyed remarkable success. However, in recent years repeated concerns relating to the efficiency of the proceedings have emerged. These concerns have led to the introduction of provisions for expedited arbitral procedures. Through analysing various arbitration rules, this book will examine the require-ments under which expedited procedures are admissible, what the central char-acteristics of such procedures are, and how such procedures can be classified and described in comparison to a conventional arbitral procedure. A significant part will examine the tension between procedural efficiency on the one hand and on quality of the procedure and award on the other. In an excursus, early determination procedures will be examined to complete the tool box to increase procedural efficiency.

Arbitration (International law)

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

International arbitration has enjoyed remarkable success. However, in recent years repeated concerns relating to the efficiency of the proceedings have emerged. These concerns have led to the introduction of provisions for expedited arbitral procedures. Through analysing various arbitration rules, this book will examine the require-ments under which expedited procedures are admissible, what the central char-acteristics of such procedures are, and how such procedures can be classified and described in comparison to a conventional arbitral procedure. A significant part will examine the tension between procedural efficiency on the one hand and on quality of the procedure and award on the other. In an excursus, early determination procedures will be examined to complete the tool box to increase procedural efficiency.

Arbitration (International law)

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Au sein des ordres juridiques, une multitude de normes habilitent les individus à exercer des prérogatives très diverses. La matière de l'arbitrage international n'échappe pas à la règle et les droits étatiques investissent ainsi les arbitres de toute une série de pouvoirs. Mais en marge de ce phénomène banal, une idée s'est fait jour : les arbitres internationaux seraient dotés de pouvoirs inhérents. Ces pouvoirs, étant de l'essence de leur fonction, existeraient indépendamment de toute norme juridique identifiée. Sont par exemple mentionnés le pouvoir des arbitres de statuer sur leur compétence, de soulever d'office la question d'une éventuelle atteinte à l'ordre public, de réviser une sentence viciée par la fraude d'une partie... Dans tous les cas, c'est l'idée de nécessité qui est avancée pour justifier l'existence des pouvoirs en question ; sans eux, le bon accomplissement de la mission des arbitres risquerait d'être compromis. L'élaboration d'une théorie de ces pouvoirs inhérents passe par une réflexion sur leur nature et leur étendue. Elle suppose aussi de considérer leur interaction avec la volonté des parties et les règles de droit applicables à l'arbitrage.

Arbitration (International law) --- Power (Philosophy) --- Pouvoir (Morale) --- Philosophy.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

The Yukos Awards are among some of the most widely discussed awards in international arbitration. A remarkable point that does not receive the "interest" it deserves is the fact that post-award interest has added USD 7 billion to the awarded value-making a considerable impact on arguably the biggest case to be handled via international arbitration.Even though post-award interest can have very serious economic consequences, most attention in academic literature to the question of interest is limited to pre-award interest, where the discussion revolves around formulaic approaches towards ensuring that pre-award interest is accounted for in claims for compensation. Post-award interest is either ignored completely or when discussed, there is not enough appreciation of the complex questions (in terms of conflict of law, specific jurisdictional issues, among others) that are central to any reasonable discussion of post-award interest. Responding to the dearth of attention paid to this very serious but often overlooked area, this text provides an in-depth analysis of the subject ensuring comprehensive coverage of all relevant issues in major Asian Pacific and Middle Eastern jurisdictions-arguably the fastest-growing economic regions in the world.The book is structured in a manner where a leading lawyer from a jurisdiction has contributed a chapter providing analysis on all possible questions that a reader may have in relation to post-award interest. The eighteen jurisdictions that have been covered are: Australia, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Myanmar, New Zealand, Pakistan, People's Republic of China, the Philippines, the Republic of Korea, Singapore, Taiwan, Thailand, Qatar, United Arab Emirates, and Vietnam. Each chapter provides an in-depth analysis of the law on post-award interest, including questions of private international law while simultaneously providing practical guidance on the following questions:power to award post-award interest;determination of applicable rate;procedural questions;public policy issues; androle of national courts.The text is structured in an easy-to-use manner, with each author responding to the same set of questions, making comparative research across jurisdictions very easy and efficient.Parties and counsel involved in arbitral proceedings with a nexus to the jurisdictions covered in this book will find the insights provided valuable and, unquestionably, so will arbitral tribunals. From an academic perspective, this publication is sure to lead to further debate on the topic. Policymakers may also take inspiration from comparing the approach taken in other jurisdictions on matters of post-award interest when refining the legal framework in their home jurisdictions. This book will hopefully contribute to the ongoing efforts to bring about consistency and predictability in the manner in which tribunals deal with damages in general, and post-award interest in particular.

Arbitration and award --- Interest --- Arbitrage (Droit) --- Arbitration (International law) --- Law and legislation --- Pacific Area

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

When governments of countries involved in territorial or maritime disputes choose to pursue peaceful resolution, there is great uncertainty about whether they can resolve the disputes in their favour. Governments need to decide which path to take in peaceful resolution-bilateral negotiations, mediation, arbitration or adjudication. The authors argue that two major factors can influence this decision - past experience with specific resolution methods and the relationship between domestic and international law for the countries involved in the disputes.

Arbitration (International law) --- Diplomatic negotiations in international disputes --- Inquiry (Theory of knowledge) --- Mediation, International --- Negotiations in international disputes --- Pacific settlement of international disputes --- Arbitration, International --- International arbitration --- International political arbitration --- International commissions of inquiry --- Jurisdiction (International law) --- Conciliation, International --- International conciliation --- International mediation --- Mediation --- Knowledge, Theory of --- Law and legislation --- Diplomatic negotiations in international disputes. --- Mediation, International. --- Politics and Government. --- Politics & government.