Listing 1 - 10 of 168 | << page >> |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
The increasing role of the financial sector in the move toward a more sustainable economic model continues apace. The Coronavirus (COVID-19) shock shone a light on the need for all society to correct course, and the financial sector is responding. The pace of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) integration into investment decisions, which has become the prevalent form of sustainable finance, continues to accelerate. These developments reflect changing societal perspectives that challenge the traditionally ingrained investment approaches that have evolved over many decades. Against this backdrop, various financial sector stakeholders continue to evaluate how their role, products, and tools should adapt to this evolving landscape. This paper focuses on sovereign credit ratings and empirically assesses how broad sovereign ESG factors as well as the ESG factors specific to a country's national wealth and management of risks and opportunities related to so-called stranded assets like fossil fuel resources are manifested in sovereign credit rating assessments.
Adaptation To Climate Change --- Carbon Policy and Trading --- Creditworthiness --- Debt Markets --- Environment --- Finance and Financial Sector Development --- Sovereign Debt
Choose an application
Since the 2008 Financial Sector Assessment Program (FSAP), the financial sector of the West African Economic and Monetary Union (WAEMU) has undergone major changes that have altered its risk profile. Three structural changes have played a key role since the 2008 FSAP: (i) the financial sector has grown significantly; (ii) regional banking groups have become dominant; and (iii) the high concentration of bank portfolios in sovereign exposures, which accounted for an average of 31 percent of banking assets at end-2020, are almost triple the level observed in 2004. These changes have altered the structure of systemic risks and vulnerabilities and raised the need for implementing reforms to strengthen the effectiveness of the macroprudential policy and banking supervision frameworks.
Money and Monetary Policy --- International Economics --- Finance: General --- Macroeconomics --- Banks and Banking --- Monetary Policy --- International Agreements and Observance --- International Organizations --- General Financial Markets: Government Policy and Regulation --- Financial Markets and the Macroeconomy --- Banks --- Depository Institutions --- Micro Finance Institutions --- Mortgages --- Monetary economics --- International institutions --- Finance --- Banking --- Monetary policy --- International organization --- Macroprudential policy --- Financial sector policy and analysis --- Financial sector stability --- Systemic risk --- Commercial banks --- Financial institutions --- Financial sector risk --- International agencies --- Financial risk management --- Financial services industry --- Economic policy --- Banks and banking
Choose an application
Since the 2008 Financial Sector Assessment Program (FSAP), the financial sector of the West African Economic and Monetary Union (WAEMU) has undergone major changes that have altered its risk profile. Three structural changes have played a key role since the 2008 FSAP: (i) the financial sector has grown significantly; (ii) regional banking groups have become dominant; and (iii) the high concentration of bank portfolios in sovereign exposures, which accounted for an average of 31 percent of banking assets at end-2020, are almost triple the level observed in 2004. These changes have altered the structure of systemic risks and vulnerabilities and raised the need for implementing reforms to strengthen the effectiveness of the macroprudential policy and banking supervision frameworks.
Money and Monetary Policy --- International Economics --- Finance: General --- Macroeconomics --- Banks and Banking --- Monetary Policy --- International Agreements and Observance --- International Organizations --- General Financial Markets: Government Policy and Regulation --- Financial Markets and the Macroeconomy --- Banks --- Depository Institutions --- Micro Finance Institutions --- Mortgages --- Monetary economics --- International institutions --- Finance --- Banking --- Monetary policy --- International organization --- Macroprudential policy --- Financial sector policy and analysis --- Financial sector stability --- Systemic risk --- Commercial banks --- Financial institutions --- Financial sector risk --- International agencies --- Financial risk management --- Financial services industry --- Economic policy --- Banks and banking
Choose an application
The U.K. financial sector is globally systemic, open, and complex. It has weathered the COVID-19 pandemic fittingly, thanks to the post-GFC reforms, a proactive macroprudential stance, and an effective multipronged response to maintain financial stability. Brexit uncertainties are being handled appropriately as the U.K. and EU authorities and the financial industry collaborate to prevent undesirable financial stability outcomes. The endpoint of the pandemic remains unclear, as does the actual impact on the financial system once support measures wane. At this juncture, therefore, financial stability conditions in the United Kingdom are being shaped by three key considerations: (i) the evolving U.K.-EU relationship on financial services; (ii) securing a sustainable and robust post-pandemic economic recovery; and (iii) successfully managing ongoing structural transitions.
Money and Monetary Policy --- International Economics --- Finance: General --- Industries: Financial Services --- Business and Financial --- Monetary Policy --- International Agreements and Observance --- International Organizations --- General Financial Markets: Government Policy and Regulation --- Pension Funds --- Non-bank Financial Institutions --- Financial Instruments --- Institutional Investors --- Financial Institutions and Services: Government Policy and Regulation --- Monetary economics --- International institutions --- Finance --- Financial services law & regulation --- Monetary policy --- International organization --- Financial sector stability --- Financial sector policy and analysis --- Financial services --- Financial sector risk --- Insurance companies --- Financial institutions --- Nonbank financial institutions --- Financial Sector Assessment Program --- International agencies --- Financial services industry --- Financial risk management --- Law and legislation --- United Kingdom
Choose an application
Digital platforms are transforming social, business, and economic norms, changing theway we interact, consume, and do business. Digital technologies present many opportunitiesand benefits for society and governments. They also provide new opportunities for taxadministrations, such as prospects for better and more efficient tax collection by accessing newdata sources and improved international collaboration.
Choose an application
The U.K. financial sector is globally systemic, open, and complex. It has weathered the COVID-19 pandemic fittingly, thanks to the post-GFC reforms, a proactive macroprudential stance, and an effective multipronged response to maintain financial stability. Brexit uncertainties are being handled appropriately as the U.K. and EU authorities and the financial industry collaborate to prevent undesirable financial stability outcomes. The endpoint of the pandemic remains unclear, as does the actual impact on the financial system once support measures wane. At this juncture, therefore, financial stability conditions in the United Kingdom are being shaped by three key considerations: (i) the evolving U.K.-EU relationship on financial services; (ii) securing a sustainable and robust post-pandemic economic recovery; and (iii) successfully managing ongoing structural transitions.
United Kingdom --- Money and Monetary Policy --- International Economics --- Finance: General --- Industries: Financial Services --- Business and Financial --- Monetary Policy --- International Agreements and Observance --- International Organizations --- General Financial Markets: Government Policy and Regulation --- Pension Funds --- Non-bank Financial Institutions --- Financial Instruments --- Institutional Investors --- Financial Institutions and Services: Government Policy and Regulation --- Monetary economics --- International institutions --- Finance --- Financial services law & regulation --- Monetary policy --- International organization --- Financial sector stability --- Financial sector policy and analysis --- Financial services --- Financial sector risk --- Insurance companies --- Financial institutions --- Nonbank financial institutions --- Financial Sector Assessment Program --- International agencies --- Financial services industry --- Financial risk management --- Law and legislation
Choose an application
In recent years, more and more African governments are looking to implement electronic-Government Procurement (e-GP) solutions to address some of the challenges associated with public procurement, such as harmonizing internal processes to optimize their execution, increasing transparency and traceability, generating financial gains, facilitating access to public procurement for all economic actors. This study was motivated by the World Bank's commitment to help African governments implement an e-GP solution that best meets their needs and constraints. For countries having and using already an e-GP system, this will help to enhance the development and updating of their system.
Choose an application
This Toolkit is aimed primarily at policy makers, financial institutions, and enterprises. It examines different types of corporate restructuring procedures on the basis that one size does not fit across all jurisdictions. Recent experience of the operation of corporate restructuring regimes around the world demonstrates that such regimes must appropriately account for domestic considerations, including a jurisdiction's institutional and regulatory framework. This Toolkit, a revised and updated version of the 2016 publication, incorporates wide-ranging updates that reflects this experience. It describes matters relevant to the adoption of workout frameworks for a broad range of types of corporate restructuring procedures, some of which provide for a role for courts or regulatory authorities. This widened perspective highlights considerations of particular relevance in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, a crisis that makes restructuring viable businesses especially important.
Choose an application
This paper studies the transmission of macroprudential policies across both financial and non financial sectors of the economy. It first documents that tighter macroprudential regulations implemented in Europe over the period 2008–2017 lowered default risk not only in the financial, but also in non-financial sectors. Second, the paper analyzes the impact of two reforms in the macroprudential framework. Higher capital requirements improve the long-run resilience of the financial sector but at the cost of raising long-term default risk in non-financial sectors. Strengthening the resolution framework for failing banks has beneficial long-run effects on the default risks of the financial and non-financial sectors. Our results concur with the literature documenting how banks adjust their balance sheet composition and credit supply in reaction to changes in their regulatory environment.
Macroeconomics --- Economics: General --- Exports and Imports --- Industries: Financial Services --- Finance: General --- Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models: Models with Panel Data --- Financial Crises --- Financial Institutions and Services: Government Policy and Regulation --- International Lending and Debt Problems --- Financial Markets and the Macroeconomy --- Financial Institutions and Services: General --- General Financial Markets: Government Policy and Regulation --- Economic & financial crises & disasters --- Economics of specific sectors --- International economics --- Finance --- Debt default --- External debt --- Macroprudential policy --- Financial sector policy and analysis --- Financial sector --- Economic sectors --- Financial sector stability --- Currency crises --- Informal sector --- Economics --- Debts, External --- Economic policy --- Financial services industry --- Singapore
Choose an application
There has been little change in the institutional framework for macroprudential policy oversight since the last FSAP. Macroprudential policy for the banking sector is a shared competency of the Financial Superintendency of Colombia (SFC), the Banco de la República (BR), and the Ministry of Finance (MHCP), although the SFC and the MHCP play dominant roles. The Financial Sector Coordination and Monitoring Committee (CCSSF), which consists of the three institutions and the Financial Institutions Guarantee Fund (Fogafin), is the main platform for information sharing and cooperation, but it does not have a macroprudential mandate or any formal powers. The SFC supervises asset managers and insurance companies, but there is no formal macroprudential oversight framework for those types of financial institutions.
Money and Monetary Policy --- International Economics --- Finance: General --- Macroeconomics --- Banks and Banking --- Monetary Policy --- International Agreements and Observance --- International Organizations --- General Financial Markets: Government Policy and Regulation --- Financial Markets and the Macroeconomy --- Financial Institutions and Services: Government Policy and Regulation --- Monetary economics --- International institutions --- Finance --- Financial services law & regulation --- Monetary policy --- International organization --- Macroprudential policy --- Financial sector policy and analysis --- Systemic risk assessment --- Financial sector stability --- Financial sector risk --- Liquidity requirements --- Financial regulation and supervision --- International agencies --- Financial risk management --- Financial services industry --- Economic policy --- Banks and banking --- State supervision --- Colombia
Listing 1 - 10 of 168 | << page >> |
Sort by
|