Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

The book aims to explore the legal and administrative aspects of spatial governance and the challenges that their interaction entails. It does this through a number of chapters focusing on case studies located in different geographical areas of Europe and beyond. By doing this, the editors shed light on a set of challenges that emerge around the world at the intersection between the legal and administrative spheres during the governance and planning of territorial phenomena. The issues addressed in the various chapters highlight how spatial planning activities continue to face serious challenges that have not yet been satisfactorily addressed. In more detail, a correlation emerges between the legal regulations that allow and shape spatial-planning activities and the socio-economic and territorial challenges that those activities should tackle. This is often a consequence of the path-dependent influence of the traditional administrative and spatial planning configuration, which presents an inertial resistance to change that is hard to overcome. A similar situation arises concerning the mismatch between the boundaries of the existing administrative units and the extent of territorial phenomena, with a system of judicial–territorial administration that does not always coincide with the boundaries of the fundamental administrative division of a country, leading to an overall deterioration of the conditions in which all actors involved in spatial development operate.

Peace studies & conflict resolution --- landscape urbanization --- metropolises --- agglomeration in Poland --- urban landscape intensity index --- local development --- local law --- budgets of local units --- financial consequences of spatial chaos --- urban sprawl --- macroeconomics --- externalities --- budget --- spatial policy --- economic policy --- urban growth management --- land use planning --- zoning --- strategic spatial planning --- institutionalism --- discourse --- Antwerp --- Flanders --- land use transition --- innovation agglomeration --- industrial pollution --- environmental protection --- innovation-driven development --- sustainable land use --- urbanization --- spatial governance and planning --- Europe --- ESPON --- SECI expansion model --- local government --- green governance --- peer behavior --- green development --- rule by law --- law-based governance --- housing price --- sensitivity --- heterogeneity --- mediating mechanism --- land economic efficiency --- environmental pollution --- carbon emissions --- sustainable cities --- eastern China --- land policy --- planning system --- land-use planning --- land development --- urban development --- legal framework --- containment --- Poland --- Germany --- Spain --- green belt --- master plan --- planning history --- planning policy --- urban containment --- urban agriculture --- Kigali --- Singapore --- land-use policy --- spatial planning --- territorial governance --- land use --- law

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

The book aims to explore the legal and administrative aspects of spatial governance and the challenges that their interaction entails. It does this through a number of chapters focusing on case studies located in different geographical areas of Europe and beyond. By doing this, the editors shed light on a set of challenges that emerge around the world at the intersection between the legal and administrative spheres during the governance and planning of territorial phenomena. The issues addressed in the various chapters highlight how spatial planning activities continue to face serious challenges that have not yet been satisfactorily addressed. In more detail, a correlation emerges between the legal regulations that allow and shape spatial-planning activities and the socio-economic and territorial challenges that those activities should tackle. This is often a consequence of the path-dependent influence of the traditional administrative and spatial planning configuration, which presents an inertial resistance to change that is hard to overcome. A similar situation arises concerning the mismatch between the boundaries of the existing administrative units and the extent of territorial phenomena, with a system of judicial–territorial administration that does not always coincide with the boundaries of the fundamental administrative division of a country, leading to an overall deterioration of the conditions in which all actors involved in spatial development operate.

Peace studies & conflict resolution --- landscape urbanization --- metropolises --- agglomeration in Poland --- urban landscape intensity index --- local development --- local law --- budgets of local units --- financial consequences of spatial chaos --- urban sprawl --- macroeconomics --- externalities --- budget --- spatial policy --- economic policy --- urban growth management --- land use planning --- zoning --- strategic spatial planning --- institutionalism --- discourse --- Antwerp --- Flanders --- land use transition --- innovation agglomeration --- industrial pollution --- environmental protection --- innovation-driven development --- sustainable land use --- urbanization --- spatial governance and planning --- Europe --- ESPON --- SECI expansion model --- local government --- green governance --- peer behavior --- green development --- rule by law --- law-based governance --- housing price --- sensitivity --- heterogeneity --- mediating mechanism --- land economic efficiency --- environmental pollution --- carbon emissions --- sustainable cities --- eastern China --- land policy --- planning system --- land-use planning --- land development --- urban development --- legal framework --- containment --- Poland --- Germany --- Spain --- green belt --- master plan --- planning history --- planning policy --- urban containment --- urban agriculture --- Kigali --- Singapore --- land-use policy --- spatial planning --- territorial governance --- land use --- law --- landscape urbanization --- metropolises --- agglomeration in Poland --- urban landscape intensity index --- local development --- local law --- budgets of local units --- financial consequences of spatial chaos --- urban sprawl --- macroeconomics --- externalities --- budget --- spatial policy --- economic policy --- urban growth management --- land use planning --- zoning --- strategic spatial planning --- institutionalism --- discourse --- Antwerp --- Flanders --- land use transition --- innovation agglomeration --- industrial pollution --- environmental protection --- innovation-driven development --- sustainable land use --- urbanization --- spatial governance and planning --- Europe --- ESPON --- SECI expansion model --- local government --- green governance --- peer behavior --- green development --- rule by law --- law-based governance --- housing price --- sensitivity --- heterogeneity --- mediating mechanism --- land economic efficiency --- environmental pollution --- carbon emissions --- sustainable cities --- eastern China --- land policy --- planning system --- land-use planning --- land development --- urban development --- legal framework --- containment --- Poland --- Germany --- Spain --- green belt --- master plan --- planning history --- planning policy --- urban containment --- urban agriculture --- Kigali --- Singapore --- land-use policy --- spatial planning --- territorial governance --- land use --- law

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

This Special Issue provides an insight, collated from 26 articles, focusing on various aspects of the Fit-For-Purpose Land Administration (FFPLA) concept and its application. It presents some influential and innovative trends and recommendations for designing, implementing, maintaining and further developing Fit-For-Purpose solutions for providing secure land rights at scale. The first group of 14 articles is published in Volume One and discusses various conceptual innovations related to spatial, legal and institutional aspects and its wider applications within land use management. The second group of 12 articles is published in Volume Two and focuses on case studies from various countries throughout the world, providing evidence and lessons learned from the FFPLA implementation process.

Research & information: general --- complete cadastre --- legal element --- fixing boundary --- eligible landowner --- agreement --- boundary marker --- fit-for-purpose land administration (FFP LA) --- violent conflict --- United Nations --- extra-legal --- transitional justice --- peace building --- land governance --- power relations --- securing land rights --- land registration --- development impacts --- fit-for-purpose land administration --- land administration --- decentralization --- India --- fit-for-purpose --- institutions --- governance --- politics --- Amazon --- deforestation --- Fit-For-Purpose land administration --- participatory mapping --- indigenous land conflict --- Cumaribo --- Colombia --- community-based land adjudication --- components of adjudication --- land tenure --- land rights --- good practices --- updating land records --- systematic land registration --- unconventional approach --- case study --- Benin --- cadaster --- land administration domain model --- LADM --- cadastre --- FFPLA --- customary tenure --- land inventory --- land management --- mobile-based applications --- pro-poor --- land surveying --- tenure security --- land rights and tenure --- fit-for-purpose approach --- human rights --- design science research --- design thinking --- fit for purpose --- spatial data quality --- spatial data quality assurance --- maintenance --- update --- upgrade --- upkeep --- renewal --- data quality --- spatial framework --- STDM --- technology --- UAV --- feature extraction --- rapid urbanization --- climate change --- pandemic --- urban resilience --- spatial --- legal --- and institutional frameworks --- land tenure security --- pro-poor land recordation --- land governance reform --- cost effectiveness --- innovative technology --- case studies --- Uganda --- customary land tenure --- land recordation tools --- semantic technologies --- land information system --- fit-for-purpose land management --- aerial and street level imagery --- machine learning --- integrated land programs --- land policy --- pilot study --- informal settlements --- urban development --- Brazil --- community-based crowdsourcing --- SiGIT --- Ecuador --- land and resources rights --- public-private partnerships --- corporate social responsibility --- poverty reduction --- business driven solutions --- social enterprises --- n/a

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

This Special Issue provides an insight, collated from 26 articles, focusing on various aspects of the Fit-For-Purpose Land Administration (FFPLA) concept and its application. It presents some influential and innovative trends and recommendations for designing, implementing, maintaining and further developing Fit-For-Purpose solutions for providing secure land rights at scale. The first group of 14 articles is published in Volume One and discusses various conceptual innovations related to spatial, legal and institutional aspects and its wider applications within land use management. The second group of 12 articles is published in Volume Two and focuses on case studies from various countries throughout the world, providing evidence and lessons learned from the FFPLA implementation process.

complete cadastre --- legal element --- fixing boundary --- eligible landowner --- agreement --- boundary marker --- fit-for-purpose land administration (FFP LA) --- violent conflict --- United Nations --- extra-legal --- transitional justice --- peace building --- land governance --- power relations --- securing land rights --- land registration --- development impacts --- fit-for-purpose land administration --- land administration --- decentralization --- India --- fit-for-purpose --- institutions --- governance --- politics --- Amazon --- deforestation --- Fit-For-Purpose land administration --- participatory mapping --- indigenous land conflict --- Cumaribo --- Colombia --- community-based land adjudication --- components of adjudication --- land tenure --- land rights --- good practices --- updating land records --- systematic land registration --- unconventional approach --- case study --- Benin --- cadaster --- land administration domain model --- LADM --- cadastre --- FFPLA --- customary tenure --- land inventory --- land management --- mobile-based applications --- pro-poor --- land surveying --- tenure security --- land rights and tenure --- fit-for-purpose approach --- human rights --- design science research --- design thinking --- fit for purpose --- spatial data quality --- spatial data quality assurance --- maintenance --- update --- upgrade --- upkeep --- renewal --- data quality --- spatial framework --- STDM --- technology --- UAV --- feature extraction --- rapid urbanization --- climate change --- pandemic --- urban resilience --- spatial --- legal --- and institutional frameworks --- land tenure security --- pro-poor land recordation --- land governance reform --- cost effectiveness --- innovative technology --- case studies --- Uganda --- customary land tenure --- land recordation tools --- semantic technologies --- land information system --- fit-for-purpose land management --- aerial and street level imagery --- machine learning --- integrated land programs --- land policy --- pilot study --- informal settlements --- urban development --- Brazil --- community-based crowdsourcing --- SiGIT --- Ecuador --- land and resources rights --- public-private partnerships --- corporate social responsibility --- poverty reduction --- business driven solutions --- social enterprises --- n/a

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

This Special Issue provides an insight, collated from 26 articles, focusing on various aspects of the Fit-For-Purpose Land Administration (FFPLA) concept and its application. It presents some influential and innovative trends and recommendations for designing, implementing, maintaining and further developing Fit-For-Purpose solutions for providing secure land rights at scale. The first group of 14 articles is published in Volume One and discusses various conceptual innovations related to spatial, legal and institutional aspects and its wider applications within land use management. The second group of 12 articles is published in Volume Two and focuses on case studies from various countries throughout the world, providing evidence and lessons learned from the FFPLA implementation process.

Research & information: general --- complete cadastre --- legal element --- fixing boundary --- eligible landowner --- agreement --- boundary marker --- fit-for-purpose land administration (FFP LA) --- violent conflict --- United Nations --- extra-legal --- transitional justice --- peace building --- land governance --- power relations --- securing land rights --- land registration --- development impacts --- fit-for-purpose land administration --- land administration --- decentralization --- India --- fit-for-purpose --- institutions --- governance --- politics --- Amazon --- deforestation --- Fit-For-Purpose land administration --- participatory mapping --- indigenous land conflict --- Cumaribo --- Colombia --- community-based land adjudication --- components of adjudication --- land tenure --- land rights --- good practices --- updating land records --- systematic land registration --- unconventional approach --- case study --- Benin --- cadaster --- land administration domain model --- LADM --- cadastre --- FFPLA --- customary tenure --- land inventory --- land management --- mobile-based applications --- pro-poor --- land surveying --- tenure security --- land rights and tenure --- fit-for-purpose approach --- human rights --- design science research --- design thinking --- fit for purpose --- spatial data quality --- spatial data quality assurance --- maintenance --- update --- upgrade --- upkeep --- renewal --- data quality --- spatial framework --- STDM --- technology --- UAV --- feature extraction --- rapid urbanization --- climate change --- pandemic --- urban resilience --- spatial --- legal --- and institutional frameworks --- land tenure security --- pro-poor land recordation --- land governance reform --- cost effectiveness --- innovative technology --- case studies --- Uganda --- customary land tenure --- land recordation tools --- semantic technologies --- land information system --- fit-for-purpose land management --- aerial and street level imagery --- machine learning --- integrated land programs --- land policy --- pilot study --- informal settlements --- urban development --- Brazil --- community-based crowdsourcing --- SiGIT --- Ecuador --- land and resources rights --- public-private partnerships --- corporate social responsibility --- poverty reduction --- business driven solutions --- social enterprises --- complete cadastre --- legal element --- fixing boundary --- eligible landowner --- agreement --- boundary marker --- fit-for-purpose land administration (FFP LA) --- violent conflict --- United Nations --- extra-legal --- transitional justice --- peace building --- land governance --- power relations --- securing land rights --- land registration --- development impacts --- fit-for-purpose land administration --- land administration --- decentralization --- India --- fit-for-purpose --- institutions --- governance --- politics --- Amazon --- deforestation --- Fit-For-Purpose land administration --- participatory mapping --- indigenous land conflict --- Cumaribo --- Colombia --- community-based land adjudication --- components of adjudication --- land tenure --- land rights --- good practices --- updating land records --- systematic land registration --- unconventional approach --- case study --- Benin --- cadaster --- land administration domain model --- LADM --- cadastre --- FFPLA --- customary tenure --- land inventory --- land management --- mobile-based applications --- pro-poor --- land surveying --- tenure security --- land rights and tenure --- fit-for-purpose approach --- human rights --- design science research --- design thinking --- fit for purpose --- spatial data quality --- spatial data quality assurance --- maintenance --- update --- upgrade --- upkeep --- renewal --- data quality --- spatial framework --- STDM --- technology --- UAV --- feature extraction --- rapid urbanization --- climate change --- pandemic --- urban resilience --- spatial --- legal --- and institutional frameworks --- land tenure security --- pro-poor land recordation --- land governance reform --- cost effectiveness --- innovative technology --- case studies --- Uganda --- customary land tenure --- land recordation tools --- semantic technologies --- land information system --- fit-for-purpose land management --- aerial and street level imagery --- machine learning --- integrated land programs --- land policy --- pilot study --- informal settlements --- urban development --- Brazil --- community-based crowdsourcing --- SiGIT --- Ecuador --- land and resources rights --- public-private partnerships --- corporate social responsibility --- poverty reduction --- business driven solutions --- social enterprises