Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Criminology. Victimology --- Polemology --- Gender --- Violence --- Misogyny --- Racism --- Stereotypes --- Terrorism --- Book

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Pinkizzazione è la recente tendenza a colorare di rosa tutto ciò che appartiene al territorio femminile: rosa i vestiti e i giocattoli delle bambine, rosa gli oggetti e gli accessori delle donne; ma rosa è anche il colore scelto dalle donne in marcia nello sciopero globale dell’8 marzo 2017. Il rosa è diventato un significante che serve a delimitare i confini di genere solo nel secolo scorso. Quando e perché è successo? Quando e perché è divenuto così di moda? La divisione dei colori - rosa per le femmine e blu per i maschi - è uno dei tanti dispositivi per il mantenimento dell’ordine di genere, un ordine rigorosamente binario che non prevede sconfinamenti e che ingabbia non solo il femminile, ma anche, o forse soprattutto, il maschile. Ancora oggi, i maschi devono mostrarsi diversi dalle femmine, ma si iniziano a intravvedere significativi segnali di cambiamento, che generano forme di resistenza. Perché le sfide all’ordine di genere fanno paura? Attraverso una ricerca sugli stereotipi di genere nelle scuole di infanzia genovesi, si è provato a rispondere a queste e altre domande, entrando nelle scuole, parlando con le insegnanti, facendo osservazione nelle classi e provando a catturare il punto di vista creativo di bambine e bambini.

Social Issues --- scuola --- colori --- identità di genere --- stereotipi --- identité de genre --- stéréotypes --- école --- enfance --- couleurs --- gender identity --- stereotypes --- school --- childhood --- colors

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Sociology of minorities --- Movies --- Gender --- Identity --- Masculinity --- Popular culture --- Racism --- Stereotypes --- Book

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

"When we think about the "pictures in our heads" that media create and perpetuate, what images are we truly referencing? Issues of media stereotypes and representation (both past and present) are crucial to advancing media literacy. Media Stereotypes: From Ageism to Xenophobia becomes one-stop shopping for synthesizing what we know within the composite of stereotyping research in the United States. Utilizing a cast of top American scholars with deep roots in asking stereotype-based questions, this book is essential reading for those wishing to understand what we know about past and present media representations as well as those wishing to take the baton and continue to advance media stereotyping research in the future"--

Semiotics --- Social problems --- Mass communications --- United States --- Stereotypes (Social psychology) in mass media. --- United States of America

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

How do journalists know what they know? Who gets to decide what good journalism is and when it's done right? What sort of expertise do journalists have, and what role should and do they play in society? Until a couple of decades ago, journalists rarely asked these questions, largely because the answers were generally undisputed. Now, the stakes are rising for journalists as they face real-time critique and audience pushback for their ethics, news reporting, and relevance. Yet the crises facing journalism have been narrowly defined as the result of disruption by new technologies and economic decline. This book argues that the concerns are in fact much more profound.Drawing on their five years of research with journalists in the U.S. and Canada, in a variety of news organizations from startups and freelancers to mainstream media, the authors find a digital reckoning taking place regarding journalism's founding ideals and methods. The book explores journalism's long-standing representational harms, arguing that despite thoughtful explorations of the role of publics in journalism, the profession hasn't adequately addressed matters of gender, race, intersectionality, and settler colonialism. In doing so, the authors rethink the basis for what journalism says it could and should do, suggesting that a turn to strong objectivity and systems journalism provides a path forward. They offer insights from journalists' own experiences and efforts at repair, reform, and transformation to consider how journalism can address its limits and possibilities along with widening media publics.

Journalism. --- Journalism --- Objectivity. --- Objectivity --- Stereotypes (Social psychology) in mass media. --- Minorities and journalism. --- Ethics. --- Social aspects. --- Political aspects. --- Journalism - Objectivity --- Journalism - Ethics. --- Journalism - Social aspects. --- Journalism - Political aspects.