Listing 1 - 10 of 206 | << page >> |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Choose an application
Choose an application
"The chapters in this volume apply the methodology of relevance theory to develop accounts of various pragmatic phenomena which can be associated with the broadly conceived notion of style. Some of them are devoted to central cases of figurative language (metaphor, metonymy, puns, irony) while others deal with issues not readily associated with figurativeness (from multimodal communicative stimuli through strong and weak implicatures to discourse functions of connectives, particles and participles). Other chapters shed light on the use of specific communicative styles, ranging from hate speech to humour and humorous irony. Using the relevance-theoretic toolkit to analyse a spectrum of style-related issues, this volume makes a case for the model of pragmatics founded upon inference and continuity, understood as the non-existence of sharply delineated boundaries between classes of communicative phenomena"--
Choose an application
Kant deals with national characters in the second part of his Anthropology from a pragmatic point of view of 1798. Firmly rejecting the climatic theory, he advocates an anti-naturalistic stance. However, Kant is skeptical of Hume's tenet that nations owe their characters to their different forms of government. In Kant's view, the most civilized nations are England and France: their characters have to do with purely cultural factors. Complementing each other, the characters of those nations broadly correspond to a masculine and feminine principle, as analyzed by Kant in the previous chapter of his Anthropology. The remaining European and Extra-European nations have a less defined - and, in some cases, mixed - character, that owes something more to the natural dispositions. Yet Kant still manages to avoid naturalistic explanations. In many nations, natural dispositions do prevail over cultural ones, but this simply means that less (and sometimes, nothing) can be said about their characters.
Choose an application
Kant deals with national characters in the second part of his Anthropology from a pragmatic point of view of 1798. Firmly rejecting the climatic theory, he advocates an anti-naturalistic stance. However, Kant is skeptical of Hume's tenet that nations owe their characters to their different forms of government. In Kant's view, the most civilized nations are England and France: their characters have to do with purely cultural factors. Complementing each other, the characters of those nations broadly correspond to a masculine and feminine principle, as analyzed by Kant in the previous chapter of his Anthropology. The remaining European and Extra-European nations have a less defined - and, in some cases, mixed - character, that owes something more to the natural dispositions. Yet Kant still manages to avoid naturalistic explanations. In many nations, natural dispositions do prevail over cultural ones, but this simply means that less (and sometimes, nothing) can be said about their characters.
Choose an application
Choose an application
Choose an application
Choose an application
Pragmatics --- Pragmatics. --- Pragmática. --- Spanish literature
Choose an application
Cet ouvrage entend revenir sur le « prédicat », notion ancienne qui puise son eau dans le katègorein d'Aristote voire, même avant, dans le rhêma de Platon. Abondamment récupéré depuis lors dans les travaux de linguistique, le prédicat est aujourd'hui d'une polysémie remarquable. Si l'insertion récente de la notion grammaticale dans les programmes scolaires du 26 novembre 2015 en France semblait prolonger ces jours heureux, le prédicat, rapidement pointé du doigt par ses opposants, est devenu, malgré lui, le parangon d'une grammaire « réformée », sinon « détériorée » ou « nuisible ». C'est dans ce contexte que l'idée d'un volume défendant et illustrant le prédicat à l'échelle de la francophonie est née
Lexicology. Semantics --- Grammar --- Pragmatics
Listing 1 - 10 of 206 | << page >> |
Sort by
|