Listing 1 - 6 of 6 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
We explore the contribution of product-quality upgrading to the export performance of six fast-growing Asian economies: China, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, South Korea, and Thailand. We focus on measuring the impact of quality upgrading on the changes in these countries’ sectoral export shares during 1970–2010. We build a multisector Ricardian trade model which allows for changes in product quality, and calibrate it to generate predictions about export volumes. Unlike previous literature, our approach allows estimation without employing domestic production data. Our results point to quality upgrading being a key driver of export shares.
Exports--Asia. --- Quality of products--Asia. --- Investments: Commodities --- Investments: Energy --- Exports and Imports --- Industries: Manufacturing --- Trade: General --- Industry Studies: Manufacturing: General --- Agriculture: General --- Energy: General --- International economics --- Investment & securities --- Manufacturing industries --- Exports --- Export performance --- Manufacturing --- Agricultural commodities --- Oil --- International trade --- Economic sectors --- Commodities --- Farm produce --- Petroleum industry and trade --- Korea, Republic of --- Industrialization.
Choose an application
Using a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model, we study the channels through which natural disaster shocks affect macroeconomic outcomes and welfare in disaster-prone countries. We solve the model using Taylor projection, a solution method that is shown to deal effectively with high-impact weather shocks calibrated in accordance to empirical evidence. We find large and persistent effects of weather shocks that significantly impact the income convergence path of disaster-prone countries. Relative to non-disaster-prone countries, on average, these shocks cause a welfare loss equivalent to a permanent fall in consumption of 1.6 percent. Welfare gains to countries that self-finance investments in resilient public infrastructure are found to be negligible, and international aid has to be sizable to achieve significant welfare gains. In addition, it is more cost-effective for donors to contribute to the financing of resilience before the realization of disasters, rather than disbursing aid after their realization.
Hazardous geographic environments. --- Macroeconomics. --- Economics --- Environments, Hazardous geographic --- Disasters --- Human ecology --- Investments: General --- Macroeconomics --- Public Finance --- Environmental Economics --- Natural Disasters --- Fiscal Policy --- Foreign Aid --- National Government Expenditures and Related Policies: Infrastructures --- Other Public Investment and Capital Stock --- Debt --- Debt Management --- Sovereign Debt --- Fiscal and Monetary Policy in Development --- Climate --- Natural Disasters and Their Management --- Global Warming --- Macroeconomics: Consumption --- Saving --- Wealth --- Investment --- Capital --- Intangible Capital --- Capacity --- Natural disasters --- Public finance & taxation --- Climate change --- Public debt --- Consumption --- Private investment --- Environment --- National accounts --- Debts, Public --- Climatic changes --- Saving and investment --- United States
Choose an application
Most macroeconomic models assume that aggregate output is generated by a specification for the production function with total physical capital as a key input. Implicitly this assumes that private and public capital stocks are perfect substitutes. In this paper we test this assumption by estimating a nested-CES production function whereas the two types of capital are considered separately along with labor as inputs. The estimation is based on our newly developed dataset on public and private capital stocks for 151 countries over a period of 1960-2014 consistent with Penn World Table version 9. We find evidence against perfect substitutability between public and private capital, especially for emerging and LIDCs, with the point estimate of the elasticity of substitution estimated closely around 3.
Investments: General --- Investments: Stocks --- Labor --- Macroeconomics --- Public Finance --- Macroeconomic Analyses of Economic Development --- Economic Development: Financial Markets --- Saving and Capital Investment --- Corporate Finance and Governance --- Fiscal and Monetary Policy in Development --- Pension Funds --- Non-bank Financial Institutions --- Financial Instruments --- Institutional Investors --- National Government Expenditures and Related Policies: Infrastructures --- Other Public Investment and Capital Stock --- Labor Economics: General --- Investment --- Capital --- Intangible Capital --- Capacity --- Human Capital --- Skills --- Occupational Choice --- Labor Productivity --- Investment & securities --- Labour --- income economics --- Public finance & taxation --- Stocks --- Public investment and public-private partnerships (PPP) --- Private investment --- Human capital --- Financial institutions --- Expenditure --- National accounts --- Public-private sector cooperation --- Labor economics --- Saving and investment --- United States --- Income economics
Choose an application
Quality Upgrading and Export Performance in the Asian Growth Miracle.
Choose an application
On the Substitution of Private and Public Capital in Production.
Choose an application
Many countries are experiencing persistent, weak medium-term growth and limited fiscal space. Against this background, economic policy agendas—in both advanced and developing economies—are focusing increasingly on structural reforms. While there is broad agreement on the economic benefits of structural reforms, the political-economy of reform is less settled. This is because reforms may generate gains only in the longer term while distributional effects may be sizable in the short run, and because governments may lack political capital to confront vocal interest groups. In these circumstances, politicians may hold back on reforms, fearing they will be penalized at the ballot box. The aim of this Staff Discussion Note is to examine whether the fear of a political cost associated with structural reforms is justified by the available evidence, and whether there are lessons from the data about how reform strategies might be designed to mitigate potential political costs. It provides a major addition to recent IMF analysis examining the output and employment effect of reforms.
Aggregate Productivity --- Balance of payments --- Capital account --- Cross-Country Output Convergence --- Current Account Adjustment --- Current account --- Economics of Regulation --- Exports and Imports --- Finance: General --- Financial regulation and supervision --- Financial sector reform --- Financial services industry --- Financial services law & regulation --- Fiscal consolidation --- Fiscal Policy --- Fiscal policy --- General Financial Markets: Government Policy and Regulation --- Institutions and Growth --- Institutions and the Macroeconomy --- International economics --- Legal Monopolies and Regulation or Deregulation --- Macroeconomics --- Macrostructural analysis --- Measurement of Economic Growth --- Models of Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior --- Plant Closings --- Political Economy --- Severance Pay --- Short-term Capital Movements --- Structural reforms --- Unemployment Insurance --- Spain
Listing 1 - 6 of 6 |
Sort by
|