Listing 1 - 10 of 17 | << page >> |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Choose an application
Choose an application
Choose an application
Can political theorists justify their ideas? Do sound political theories need foundations? What constitutes a well-justified argument in political discourse? Don Herzog attempts to answer these questions by investigating the ways in which major theorists in the Anglo-American political tradition have justified their views. Making use of a wide range of primary texts, Herzog examines the work of such important theorists as Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, the utilitarians (Jeremy Bentham, J. S. Mill. Henry Sidgwick, J. C. Harsanyi, R. M. Hare, and R. B. Brandt), David Hume, and Adam Smith. Herzog argues that Hobbes, Locke, and the utilitarians fail to justify their theories because they try to ground the volatile world of politics in immutable aspects of human nature, language, theology, or rationality. Herzog concludes that the works of Adam Smith and David Hume offer illuminating examples of successful justifications. Basing their political conclusions on social contexts, not on abstract principles, Hume and Smith develop creative solutions to given problems.
Political science --- Justification (Theory of knowledge) --- History. --- Knowledge, Theory of --- State, The --- History of theories
Choose an application
Paul often says that God »justifies« people in Christ, but what does that mean God does? The language appears legal, but many other interpretations have been suggested. Beginning from the use of this language in Judaism and early Christianity, James B. Prothro investigates biblical legal conflicts and the terminology of »justification« in Paul's letters to determine what it means for Paul to say that God as judge is the »justifier« of those who trust in Christ.
Justification (Christian theology) --- 227.08 --- Faith and justification --- Justification --- Justification by faith --- Salvation --- 227.08 Paulinische theologie --- Paulinische theologie --- Christianity --- Bible. --- Epistles of Paul --- Paul, Epistles of --- Paul Sŏsin --- Pauline epistles --- Risālat al-Qiddīs Būlus al-rasūl al-thāniyah ilá Tīmūthīʼūs --- Theology. --- Language, style.
Choose an application
Choose an application
Paul writes that we are justified by faith apart from 'works of the law', a disputed term that represents a fault line between 'old' and 'new' perspectives on Paul. Was the Apostle reacting against the Jews' good works done to earn salvation, or the Mosaic Law's practices that identified the Jewish people? Matthew J. Thomas examines how Paul's second century readers understood these points in conflict, how they relate to 'old' and 'new' perspectives, and what their collective witness suggests about the Apostle's own meaning. Surprisingly, these early witnesses align closely with the 'new' perspective, though their reasoning often differs from both viewpoints. They suggest that Paul opposes these works neither due to moralism, nor primarily for experiential or social reasons, but because the promised new law and covenant, which are transformative and universal in scope, have come in Christ.
Jewish law --- Justification (Christian theology) --- Law (Theology) --- Fathers of the church --- 227.08 --- Church fathers --- Patristics --- Philosophy, Patristic --- Christians --- 227.08 Paulinische theologie --- Paulinische theologie --- Providence and government of God --- Christianity and law --- Faith and justification --- Justification --- Justification by faith --- Salvation --- Biblical law --- Civil law (Jewish law) --- Halacha --- Halakha --- Halakhah --- Hebrew law --- Jews --- Law, Hebrew --- Law, Jewish --- Law, Mosaic --- Law in the Bible --- Mosaic law --- Torah law --- Law, Semitic --- Commandments (Judaism) --- Biblical teaching --- Criticism, interpretation, etc --- History --- Christianity --- Law --- Paul, --- Pavel, --- Pavol, --- Paulus von Tarsus, --- Paulos, --- Pōghos, --- Paweł, --- Paweł z Tarsu, --- Būlus, --- Pablo, --- Paulo de Tarso, --- Paolo di Tarso, --- Pál, --- Apostolos Paulos --- Saul, --- القديس بولس الرسول --- بولس، --- 사도바울 --- Bible. --- Epistles of Paul --- Paul, Epistles of --- Paul Sŏsin --- Pauline epistles --- Risālat al-Qiddīs Būlus al-rasūl al-thāniyah ilá Tīmūthīʼūs --- Criticism, interpretation, etc. --- Paulus, --- Pawełm --- Paulo, --- Paolo,
Choose an application
Much of the writing in Anglo-American epistemology in the twentieth century focused on the conditions for beliefs being "justified." In a book that seeks to shift the ground of debate within theory of knowledge, William P. Alston finds that the century-long search for a correct account of the nature and conditions of epistemic justification misses the point. Alston calls for that search to be suspended and for talk of epistemic justification to cease. He proposes instead an approach to the epistemology of belief that focuses on the evaluation of various "epistemic desiderata" that may be satisfied by beliefs.Alston finds that features of belief that are desirable for the goals of cognition include having an adequate basis, being formed in a reliable way, and coherence within bodies of belief. In Alston's view, a belief's being based on an adequate ground and its being formed in a reliable way, though often treated as competing accounts of justification, are virtually identical. Beyond "Justification" also contains discussions of fundamental questions about the epistemic status of principles and beliefs and appropriate responses to various kinds of skepticism.
Belief and doubt --- Epistemics --- Justification (Theory of knowledge) --- Knowledge, Theory of --- Epistemology --- Theory of knowledge --- Philosophy --- Psychology --- General semantics --- Conviction --- Doubt --- Consciousness --- Credulity --- Emotions --- Religion --- Will --- Agnosticism --- Rationalism --- Skepticism --- Belief and doubt. --- Epistemics. --- Knowledge, Theory of.
Choose an application
Over the centuries Americans have turned to torture during moments of crisis, and have debated its legitimacy and efficacy in defense of law and order. Tracing these historical attempts to adapt torture to democratic values, Fitzhugh Brundage reveals the recurring struggle over what limits Americans are willing to impose on the power of the state.
Torture --- Torture --- Justification (Ethics) --- History. --- Moral and ethical aspects --- Abu Ghraib. --- Andersonville. --- Anti-Imperialists. --- Bush. --- CIA. --- Geneva Conventions. --- George Brandle. --- Guantanamo Bay. --- Jon Burge. --- Korean War. --- McKinley. --- My Lai. --- POWs. --- Philippines War. --- Reagan. --- Third Degree. --- Vietnam War. --- enhanced interrogation. --- exceptionalism.
Choose an application
Over the centuries Americans have turned to torture during moments of crisis, and have debated its legitimacy and efficacy in defense of law and order. Tracing these historical attempts to adapt torture to democratic values, Fitzhugh Brundage reveals the recurring struggle over what limits Americans are willing to impose on the power of the state.
Torture --- Justification (Ethics) --- History. --- Moral and ethical aspects --- Abu Ghraib. --- Andersonville. --- Anti-Imperialists. --- Bush. --- CIA. --- Geneva Conventions. --- George Brandle. --- Guantanamo Bay. --- Jon Burge. --- Korean War. --- McKinley. --- My Lai. --- POWs. --- Philippines War. --- Reagan. --- Third Degree. --- Vietnam War. --- enhanced interrogation. --- exceptionalism.
Listing 1 - 10 of 17 | << page >> |
Sort by
|