Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Al meer dan twee eeuwen wordt grond geprivatiseerd, verkaveld en vermarkt. En al even lang zijn er schuchtere pogingen om dat proces te stoppen of om te keren ? denk aan pacht, sociale woningbouw, natuurherstel of stadsvernieuwing. In dit boek tonen de auteurs praktijkvoorbeelden waarin mensen gezamenlijk optreden als de publieke overheid én de markt tekortschieten. De initiatieven verzachten effecten van vermarkting. Tegelijk botsen ze op het ?absolute?, wettelijk verankerde recht op eigendom, of op nieuwe privatisering. Bij vragen over gedeeld eigenaarschap of gebruiksrecht beland je bij de commons: culturele en natuurlijke hulpbronnen gebruikt en beheerd door burgers. Op grond van samenwerking bundelt bijdragen van diverse Vlaamse experten inzake commons, en vertrekt vanuit het INDIGO-project. Dit boek richt zich tot een brede groep van praktijkmensen die op zoek zijn naar nieuwe, meer solidaire manieren om grond te beheren.(bron: https://www.epo.be/nl/ecologie/3636-op-grond-van-samenwerking-9789462671508.html)

National wealth --- Environmental planning --- Community organization --- Economic geography --- 711.4 --- 711.4 Gemeentelijke planologie. Stadsplanning. Stedenbouw --- Gemeentelijke planologie. Stadsplanning. Stedenbouw --- Sociologie van de samenlevingsopbouw --- Nationaal vermogen --- Zakenrecht --- Ruimtelijke ordening --- Economische geografie --- Vlaanderen --- Gemeentelijke planologie. Stadsplanning. Stedenbouw. --- 711.6 --- 332 --- 728.01 --- België --- Stadsplanning --- Stedenbouw (kritiek) --- Stedenbouw (theorie) --- Stedenbouw --- Grondbeleid --- Wonen (filosofie) --- Wonen (theorie) --- Law of real property --- Flanders --- duurzame ontwikkeling --- Deeleconomie --- Commons --- Duurzame ontwikkeling --- Huisvesting --- Trage wegen --- Voeding --- Communauté --- Comportement social --- Coopération --- Propriété --- Espace résiduel --- Drank --- Gezondheid

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

A wide-ranging discussion already exists within the disaster scholarship and practice on the potential social, economic and cultural repercussions of post-disaster reconstruction strategies, such as economic and social impoverishment, marginalization and disruption of social networks. In this discussion, what is not sufficiently investigated are the various roles architects (should) play in addressing/limiting these repercussions. The reality is that building professionals not only contribute to the construction of safer and more ‘resilient’ buildings in their role as designers of material artefacts; they also engage with various reconstruction agents (governmental authorities, NGOs, fund providers, community leaders, civic groups) to co-guide socially complex, multi-level, and highly intra-disciplinary rebuilding processes that could address or reinforce socio-spatial ills and hence, increase or decrease social resilience. To fill the lacunae in the scientific discourse, this master thesis investigates the multifaceted role of architects in fostering (or hindering) the resilience of disaster-affected houses and communities in and through post-disaster rebuilding and resettlement processes. The research sets out to uncover the recovery-resilience-architect nexus by bringing theories of disaster recovery and resilience, multi-level governance and political architecture in dialogue with each other. The heterogeneity of roles (social, political, physical) acquired by architects in post-disaster multi-governed recovery projects and processes is empirically covered during fieldwork conducted in the Merapi area (Indonesia) between February and March 2018. During this two-month visit, a short study of three post-2010 volcano eruption recovery programs was conducted for primary data collection. The three programs were purposively selected to dig into the multifacetedness of architects in different rebuilding strategies (varied levels of engagement, authority, impact of the profession on the beneficiaries) in order to dig out the potential and limitations of the profession in ‘building’ post-disaster resilient houses and communities. During the study, the following research methods were mobilized: document survey, semi-structured interviews with key actors (governmental officials, local architects, urban planners, local professors) and questionnaires distributed throughout the villages in which the three recovery programs were implemented. This research reveals that a multitude of different roles – single or combined - are taken up by architects who participate in reconstruction initiatives. The extent to which the chosen roles contribute to building resilience and vulnerability reduction in the contexts of heterogeneous disaster affected communities, depends largely on (1) the governance structure of each reconstruction project and its openness in bolstering multi-level interactions, (2) the understanding, respect and incorporation by architects of the cultural, political and economic specificities of each intervention area, and (3) the institutional and programming rigidities which can only be addressed when architects become radically politicized and connected with larger socio-political movements.