Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

How has the modern conservative movement thrived in spite of the lack of harmony among its constituent members? What, and who, holds together its large corporate interests, small-government libertarians, social and racial traditionalists, and evangelical Christians? Raised Right pursues these questions through a cultural study of three iconic conservative figures: National Review editor William F. Buckley, Jr., President Ronald Reagan, and Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. Examining their papers, writings, and rhetoric, Jeffrey R. Dudas identifies what he terms a "paternal rights discourse"—the arguments about fatherhood and rights that permeate their personal lives and political visions. For each, paternal discipline was crucial to producing autonomous citizens worthy and capable of self-governance. This paternalist logic is the cohesive agent for an entire conservative movement, uniting its celebration of "founding fathers," past and present, constitutional and biological. Yet this discourse produces a paradox: When do authoritative fathers transfer their rights to these well-raised citizens? This duality propels conservative politics forward with unruly results. The mythology of these American fathers gives conservatives something, and someone, to believe in—and therein lies its timeless appeal.

Conservatives --- Families --- Civil rights --- Fathers and sons --- Conservatism --- Basic rights --- Civil liberties --- Constitutional rights --- Fundamental rights --- Rights, Civil --- Constitutional law --- Human rights --- Political persecution --- Family --- Family life --- Family relationships --- Family structure --- Relationships, Family --- Structure, Family --- Social institutions --- Birth order --- Domestic relations --- Home --- Households --- Kinship --- Marriage --- Matriarchy --- Parenthood --- Patriarchy --- Persons --- Political aspects --- Philosophy. --- Law and legislation --- Social aspects --- Social conditions --- Buckley, William F., --- Reagan, Ronald --- Thomas, Clarence, --- Reagan, Ronald W. --- Reagan, Ronald Wilson, --- Rīkǣn, Rōnan, --- Reĭgan, R., --- Reagan, Ronnie, --- Reĭgan, Ronalʹd Uilson, --- Reĭgŭn, Ronald, --- Rījān, Rūnāld, --- Rayjān, Rūnāld, --- Reigŏn, Ronaldŭ, --- Lieh-ken, --- Lei-ken, --- Buckley, Bill, --- Buckley, William F. --- Family. --- Reagan, Ronald Wilson --- Rīkǣn, Rōnan --- Reĭgan, R. --- Reagan, Ronnie --- Reĭgan, Ronalʹd Uilson --- Reĭgŭn, Ronald --- Rījān, Rūnāld --- Rayjān, Rūnāld --- Reigŏn, Ronaldŭ --- Lieh-ken --- Lei-ken

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

The politics and policies that led to America's expansion of the penal system and reduction of welfare programs In 1970's America, politicians began "getting tough" on drugs, crime, and welfare. These campaigns helped expand the nation's penal system, discredit welfare programs, and cast blame for the era's social upheaval on racialized deviants that the state was not accountable to serve or represent. Getting Tough sheds light on how this unprecedented growth of the penal system and the evisceration of the nation's welfare programs developed hand in hand. Julilly Kohler-Hausmann shows that these historical events were animated by struggles over how to interpret and respond to the inequality and disorder that crested during this period. When social movements and the slowing economy destabilized the U.S. welfare state, politicians reacted by repudiating the commitment to individual rehabilitation that had governed penal and social programs for decades. In its place, they championed strategies of punishment, surveillance, and containment. The architects of these tough strategies insisted they were necessary, given the failure of liberal social programs and the supposed pathological culture within poor African American and Latino communities. Kohler-Hausmann rejects this explanation and describes how the spectacle of enacting punitive policies convinced many Americans that social investment was counterproductive and the "underclass" could be managed only through coercion and force. Getting Tough illuminates this narrative through three legislative cases: New York's adoption of the 1973 Rockefeller drug laws, Illinois's and California's attempts to reform welfare through criminalization and work mandates, and California's passing of a 1976 sentencing law that abandoned rehabilitation as an aim of incarceration. Spanning diverse institutions and weaving together the perspectives of opponents, supporters, and targets of punitive policies, Getting Tough offers new interpretations of dramatic transformations in the modern American state.

Public welfare --- Imprisonment --- Criminal justice, Administration of --- Administration of criminal justice --- Justice, Administration of --- Crime --- Criminal law --- Criminals --- Confinement --- Incarceration --- Corrections --- Detention of persons --- Punishment --- Prison-industrial complex --- Prisons --- History --- Political aspects --- Law and legislation --- United States --- Politics and government --- 1970s America. --- 1973 drug laws. --- American lawmakers. --- California. --- Nelson Rockefeller. --- Ronald Reagan. --- U.S. welfare state. --- addicts. --- administrators. --- bureaucratic scrutiny. --- civic status. --- crime. --- criminalization. --- disorder. --- drug laws. --- drug rehabilitation. --- drug users. --- drugs. --- eligibility standards. --- fraud prosecutions. --- governing problems. --- heroin. --- inequality. --- law enforcement. --- law-and-order activists. --- law-and-order politicians. --- lawmakers. --- leftist radicals. --- legal reforms. --- low-income community. --- modern America. --- narcotics. --- penal rituals. --- penal sanctions. --- penal system. --- people of color. --- policymakers. --- political insurgency. --- political rhetoric. --- political rights. --- politicians. --- prison system. --- prisoners. --- prisons. --- punishment. --- pushers. --- rehabilitative ideal. --- rehabilitative regime. --- retribution. --- safety net. --- sentencing policy. --- social movements. --- social regulation. --- social upheaval. --- social welfare programs. --- state officials. --- state supports. --- street crime. --- surveillance. --- therapeutic regime. --- tough proposal. --- toughness imperative. --- welfare fraud. --- welfare recipients. --- welfare. --- work requirements. --- School-to-prison pipeline --- Since 1969