Listing 1 - 3 of 3 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
"The global system of alliances that the United States built after the Second World War underpinned the stability and prosperity of the postwar order. But during the 20th century, the multilateral NATO alliance system in Europe and the bilateral San Francisco alliance system in Asia rarely interacted. This changed in the early 21st century, as US allies came together to fight and stabilise conflicts in the Middle East and Central Asia. This volume presents the first-ever comparative study of US alliances in Europe and Asia from the perspectives of US allies: the challenges, opportunities and shifting dynamics of these fundamental pillars of order. This volume is essential reading for those interested in contemporary and future regional and global security dynamics." --
Balance of power. --- Alliances. --- United States --- Foreign relations --- Alliances --- Treaties of alliance --- Power, Balance of --- Power politics --- Law and legislation --- International relations --- Treaties --- Political realism
Choose an application
The BRICS (China, Russia, India, Brazil, and South Africa), an exclusive international club, perceive an ongoing global power shift and contest the West's pretensions to permanent stewardship of the liberal economic order. Against expectations, they have exercised collective financial statecraft with remarkable success to seek reforms, influence, and leadership roles.
Balance of power. --- BRIC countries --- Foreign economic relations. --- Foreign relations. --- Power, Balance of --- Power politics --- International relations --- Political realism --- Big Four countries --- BRICS countries
Choose an application
War presents a curious paradox. Interstate war is arguably the most carefully planned endeavor by states, yet military history is filled with disasters and blunders of monumental proportions. These anomalies happen because most military history presumes that states are pursuing optimal strategies in a competitive environment. This book offers an alternative narrative in which the pillars of military planning - evaluations of power, strategy, and interests - are theorized as social constructions rather than simple material realities. States may be fighting wars primarily to gain or maintain power, yet in any given historical era such pursuits serve only to propel competition; they do not ensure military success in subsequent generations. Allowing states to embark on hapless military ventures is fraught with risks, while the rewards are few.
War. --- Balance of power. --- Power (Social sciences) --- Strategy. --- Military strategy --- Military art and science --- Military doctrine --- Empowerment (Social sciences) --- Political power --- Exchange theory (Sociology) --- Political science --- Social sciences --- Sociology --- Consensus (Social sciences) --- Power, Balance of --- Power politics --- International relations --- Political realism --- Armed conflict (War) --- Conflict, Armed (War) --- Fighting --- Hostilities --- Wars
Listing 1 - 3 of 3 |
Sort by
|