Listing 1 - 10 of 73 | << page >> |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
How can a society’s well-being be measured to include not only average incomes but also their distribution? How can the effects of policies be assessed by considering both equity and efficiency? This primer outlines the seminal contributions of influential economists of the past, including Arthur Okun, who developed a simple method to elicit people’s preferences regarding redistribution, and Anthony Atkinson, who showed how equity and efficiency can be measured simultaneously and summarized in a single, intuitive index expressed in monetary units (such as dollars). These methods are applied to recent data to gauge how countries fare when both mean incomes and their distribution are considered together, and to a hypothetical tax-and-transfer scheme assessed through a general equilibrium model for household-level data.
Foreign Exchange --- Macroeconomics --- Externalities --- Personal Income, Wealth, and Their Distributions --- Aggregate Factor Income Distribution --- Macroeconomics: Consumption --- Saving --- Wealth --- Currency --- Foreign exchange --- Personal income --- Income inequality --- Income distribution --- Purchasing power parity --- Consumption --- National accounts --- Income --- Economics --- United States
Choose an application
This 2017 Article IV Consultation highlights that the United States is in the longest expansion since 1850. The unemployment rate has fallen to 4.4 percent and job growth continues to be strong. The economy has gone through a temporary growth dip in the early part of 2017, but momentum has picked up. The economy is expected to grow at 2.1 percent in 2017 and 2018, supported by solid consumption growth and a rebound in investment. Over the next 12–18 months, personal consumer expenditure inflation is expected to slowly rise above 2 percent, before returning to the Federal Reserve’s medium-term target of 2 percent.
International Monetary Fund --- Internationaal monetair fonds --- International monetary fund --- Banks and Banking --- Foreign Exchange --- Inflation --- Labor --- Macroeconomics --- Aggregate Factor Income Distribution --- Labor Standards: Labor Force Composition --- Price Level --- Deflation --- Labor Economics: General --- Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs: General --- Labour --- income economics --- Currency --- Foreign exchange --- Banking --- Data capture & analysis --- Income --- Labor force participation --- Labor share --- National accounts --- Prices --- Labor market --- Labor economics --- Wages --- United States
Choose an application
This paper investigates the determinants of sustained accelerations in goods and services exports. Strong predictors of export takeoffs include domestic and structural indicators such as lower macroeconomic uncertainty, improved quality of institutions, a depreciated exchange rate, and agricultural reforms. Lower tariffs, participation in global value chains and diversification also contribute to initiating export accelerations. The paper also finds heterogeneity, with somewhat different triggers for Latin America and the Caribbean, as well as for goods and services. Finally, despite the lack of a robust effect on output, export surges tend to be associated with lower post-acceleration unemployment and income inequality.
Latin America --- Economic conditions. --- Exports and Imports --- Macroeconomics --- Trade Policy --- International Trade Organizations --- Empirical Studies of Trade --- Economic Growth of Open Economies --- Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth --- Economywide Country Studies: Latin America --- Caribbean --- Trade: General --- Aggregate Factor Income Distribution --- International economics --- Exports --- Service exports --- Export performance --- Income inequality --- Income distribution --- International trade --- National accounts --- Brazil
Choose an application
This paper presents new results on the relationship between income inequality and education expansion—that is, increasing average years of schooling and reducing inequality of schooling. When dynamic panel estimation techniques are used to address issues of persistence and endogeneity, we find a large, positive, statistically significant and stable relationship between inequality of schooling and income inequality, especially in emerging and developing economies and among older age cohorts. The relationship between income inequality and average years of schooling is positive, consistent with constant or increasing returns to additional years of schooling. While this positive relationship is small and not always statistically significant, we find a statistically significant negative relationship with years of schooling of younger cohorts. Statistical tests indicate that our dynamic estimators are consistent and that our identifying instruments are valid. Policy simulations suggest that education expansion will continue to be inequality reducing. This role will diminish as countries develop, but it could be enhanced through a stronger focus on reducing inequality in the quality of education.
Income distribution. --- Distribution of income --- Income inequality --- Inequality of income --- Distribution (Economic theory) --- Disposable income --- Econometrics --- Macroeconomics --- Demography --- Distribution: General --- National Government Expenditures and Education --- Education and Inequality --- Aggregate Factor Income Distribution --- Education: General --- Estimation --- Demographic Economics: General --- Education --- Econometrics & economic statistics --- Population & demography --- Income distribution --- Estimation techniques --- Population and demographics --- Econometric models --- Population
Choose an application
In this paper, we use a DSGE model to study the passive and time-varying implementation of macroprudential policy when policymakers have noisy and lagged data, as commonly observed in lowincome and developing countries (LIDCs). The model features an economy with two agents; households and entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurs are the borrowers in this economy and need capital as collateral to obtain loans. The macroprudential regulator uses the collateral requirement as the policy instrument. In this set-up, we compare policy performances of permanently increasing the collateral requirement (passive policy) versus a time-varying (active) policy which responds to credit developments. Results show that with perfect and timely information, an active approach is welfare superior, since it is more effective in providing financial stability with no long-run output cost. If the policymaker is not able to observe the economic conditions perfectly or observe with a lag, a cautious (less aggressive) policy or even a passive approach may be preferred. However, the latter comes at the expense of increasing inequality and a long-run output cost. The results therefore point to the need for a more careful consideration toward the passive policy, which is usually advocated for LIDCs.
Credit. --- Borrowing --- Finance --- Money --- Loans --- Finance: General --- Macroeconomics --- Industries: Financial Services --- Financial Markets and the Macroeconomy --- Business Fluctuations --- Cycles --- General Financial Markets: Government Policy and Regulation --- Banks --- Depository Institutions --- Micro Finance Institutions --- Mortgages --- Aggregate Factor Income Distribution --- Macroeconomics: Consumption --- Saving --- Wealth --- Financial sector stability --- Macroprudential policy --- Collateral --- Income inequality --- Consumption --- Financial services industry --- Economic policy --- Income distribution --- Economics
Choose an application
We revisit the relationship between international trade, economic growth and inequality with a focus on Latin America and the Caribbean. The paper combines two approaches: First, we employ a cross-country panel framework to analyze the macroeconomic effects of international trade on economic growth and inequality considering the strength of trade connections as well as characteristics of countries’ export markets and products. Second, we consider event studies of past episodes of trade liberalization to extract general lessons on the impact of trade liberalization on economic growth and its structure and inequality. Both approaches consistently point to two broad messages: First, trade openness and connectivity to the center of the trade network has substantial macroeconomic benefits. Second, we do not find a statistically significant or economically sizable direct impact of trade on overall income inequality.
Globalization --- Latin America --- Economic conditions. --- E-books --- Exports and Imports --- Macroeconomics --- Economic Growth of Open Economies --- Globalization: General --- Trade: General --- Aggregate Factor Income Distribution --- Trade Policy --- International Trade Organizations --- Financial Aspects of Economic Integration --- International economics --- Exports --- Income inequality --- Trade liberalization --- Trade integration --- Trade policy --- International trade --- National accounts --- Economic integration --- Income distribution --- Commercial policy --- International economic integration --- Mexico
Choose an application
We estimate the effects on growth of nine fiscal reform episodes in seven high-income countries using the Synthetic Control Method. These episodes are selected using an indicator-based approach applied to the evaluation of growth-friendly fiscal reforms during 1975-2010. We find that in reform countries the annual growth rate of real GDP was on average about 1 percentage point above their synthetic units 10 years after each respective reform. Moreover, countries which were initially less developed seemed to experience a larger growth impact after their reforms. Results are broadly robust to controlling for structural reforms on business regulation, financial market, labor market, and legal and product markets, which may also affect growth. Our findings also suggest that inequality is not affected by the growth-friendly fiscal reforms analyzed in this paper.
Macroeconomics --- Public Finance --- Fiscal Policy --- Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity: General --- Comparative Studies of Countries --- Institutions and the Macroeconomy --- Aggregate Factor Income Distribution --- Personal Income, Wealth, and Their Distributions --- Fiscal policy --- Structural reforms --- Personal income --- Income inequality --- Income distribution --- Macrostructural analysis --- National accounts --- Income --- Chile
Choose an application
Outward migration has been an important phenomenon for countries in Latin American and the Caribbean (LAC), particularly those in Central America and the Caribbean. This paper examines recent trends in outward migration from and remittances to LAC, as well as their costs and benefits. For the home country, the negative impact from emigration on labor resources and productivity seems to outweigh growth gains from remittances, notably for the Caribbean. However, given emigration, remittance flows play key financing and stabilizing roles in Central America and the Caribbean. They facilitate private consumption smoothing, support financial sector stability and fiscal revenues, and help reduce poverty and inequality, without strong evidence for harmful competitiveness effects through shifts in the real exchange rate.
Economic stabilization --- Exports and Imports --- Macroeconomics --- Demography --- Emigration and Immigration --- International Migration --- Remittances --- Economywide Country Studies: Latin America --- Caribbean --- Aggregate Factor Income Distribution --- Demographic Economics: General --- Macroeconomics: Consumption --- Saving --- Wealth --- International economics --- Migration, immigration & emigration --- Population & demography --- Migration --- Income --- Population and demographics --- Consumption --- Balance of payments --- National accounts --- International finance --- Emigration and immigration --- Population --- Economics --- United States
Choose an application
This paper assesses the macroeconomic and distributional impact of personal income tax (PIT) reforms in the U.S. drawing on a multi-sector heterogenous agents model in which consumers have non-homothetic preferences and sectors differ in terms of their relative labor and skill intensity. The model is calibrated to key characteristics of the US economy. We find that (i) PIT cuts stimulate growth but the supply side effects are never large enough to offset the revenue loss from lower marginal tax rates; (ii) PIT cuts do “trickle-down” the income distribution: tax cuts stimulate demand for non-tradable services which raise the wages and employment prospects of low-skilled workers even if the tax cut is not directly incident on them; (iii) A revenue neutral tax plan that reduces PIT for middle-income groups, raises the consumption tax, and expands the Earned Income Tax Credit can have modestly positive effects on growth while reducing income polarization; (iv) The growth effects from lower income taxes are concentrated in non-tradable service sectors although the increased demand for tradable goods generate positive spillovers to other countries; (v) Tax cuts targeted to higher income groups have a stronger growth impact than tax cuts for middle income households but significantly worsen income polarization, even after taking into account trickle-down effects and an expansion of the Earned Income Tax Credit.
Macroeconomics --- Taxation --- Personal Finance -Taxation --- Fiscal Policy --- Personal Income and Other Nonbusiness Taxes and Subsidies --- Aggregate Factor Income Distribution --- Macroeconomics: Consumption --- Saving --- Wealth --- Labor Economics: General --- Business Taxes and Subsidies --- Public finance & taxation --- Labour --- income economics --- Income --- Consumption --- Labor --- Income and capital gains taxes --- Consumption taxes --- National accounts --- Taxes --- Personal income tax --- Economics --- Labor economics --- Income tax --- Spendings tax --- United States
Choose an application
In the cross section of countries, there is a strong positive correlation between trade and income, and a negative relationship between trade and inequality. Does this reflect a causal relationship? We adopt the Frankel and Romer (1999) identification strategy, and exploit countries' exogenous geographic characteristics to estimate the causal effect of trade on income and inequality. Our cross-country estimates for trade's impact on real income are consistently positive and significant over time. At the same time, we do not find any statistical evidence that more trade increases aggregate measures of income inequality. Heeding previous concerns in the literature (e.g. Rodriguez and Rodrik, 2001; Rodrik, Subramanian and Trebbi, 2004), we carefully analyze the validity of our geography-based instrument, and confirm that the IV estimates for the impact of trade are not driven by other direct or indirect effects of geography through non-trade channels.
Exports and Imports --- Macroeconomics --- Demography --- Aggregate Factor Income Distribution --- Personal Income, Wealth, and Their Distributions --- Trade Policy --- International Trade Organizations --- Demographic Economics: General --- International economics --- Population & demography --- Personal income --- Income inequality --- Income distribution --- Plurilateral trade --- Population and demographics --- Income --- International trade --- Population
Listing 1 - 10 of 73 | << page >> |
Sort by
|