Listing 1 - 3 of 3 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Swing pricing allows a fund manager to transfer to redeeming or subscribing investors the costs associated with their trading activity, thus potentially discouraging large flows. This liquidity management tool, which is already used in major jurisdictions, may also help mitigate systemic risk. Here we develop and apply a methodology to investigate whether swing pricing does in fact help dampen flows out of funds, especially during periods of market stress. Drawing on evidence of first-mover advantage within a group of ‘swinging’ corporate bond funds, we provide policy considerations for enhancing the tool’s effectiveness as a systemic risk mitigant.
Banks and Banking --- Finance: General --- Financial Risk Management --- Public Finance --- Model Construction and Estimation --- Quantitative Policy Modeling --- Financial Crises --- Pension Funds --- Non-bank Financial Institutions --- Financial Instruments --- Institutional Investors --- General Financial Markets: Government Policy and Regulation --- Financing Policy --- Financial Risk and Risk Management --- Capital and Ownership Structure --- Value of Firms --- Goodwill --- International Financial Markets --- Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue: General --- Portfolio Choice --- Investment Decisions --- Finance --- Financial services law & regulation --- Public finance & taxation --- Systemic risk --- Liquidity risk --- Asset management --- Risk mitigation in revenue administration --- Liquidity management --- Financial sector policy and analysis --- Financial regulation and supervision --- Asset and liability management --- Revenue administration --- Financial risk management --- Asset-liability management --- Liquidity --- Economics --- United States
Choose an application
Interconnectedness among global systemically important banks (GSIBs) and global systemically important insurers (GSIIs) has important financial stability implications. This paper examines connectedness among United States, European and Asian GSIBs and GSIIs, using publicly-available daily equity returns and intra-day volatility data from October 2007 to August 2016. Results reveal strong regional clusters of return and volatility connectedness amongst GSIBs and GSIIs. Compared to Asia, selected GSIBs and GSIIs headquartered in the United States and Europe appear to be main sources of market-based connectedness. Total system connectedness—i.e., among all GSIBs and GSIIs—tends to rise during financial stress, which is corroborated by a balance sheet oriented systemic risk measure. Lastly, the paper demonstrates significant influence of economic policy uncertainty and U.S. long-term interest rates on total connectedness among systemically important institutions, and the important role of bank profitability and asset quality in driving bank-specific return connectedness.
Risk. --- Economics --- Uncertainty --- Probabilities --- Profit --- Risk-return relationships --- Banks and Banking --- Financial Risk Management --- Industries: Financial Services --- Investments: Stocks --- Banks --- Depository Institutions --- Micro Finance Institutions --- Mortgages --- Insurance --- Insurance Companies --- Actuarial Studies --- Time-Series Models --- Dynamic Quantile Regressions --- Dynamic Treatment Effect Models --- Diffusion Processes --- State Space Models --- Financial Institutions and Services: General --- Financial Crises --- Pension Funds --- Non-bank Financial Institutions --- Financial Instruments --- Institutional Investors --- Finance --- Economic & financial crises & disasters --- Banking --- Investment & securities --- Global systemically important banks --- Global systemically important insurers --- Financial crises --- Insurance companies --- Financial institutions --- Stocks --- Financial services industry --- Banks and banking --- United States
Choose an application
Loss of market access (LMA) is a central element and an exacerbator of balance of payments and fiscal crises. This paper provides an operational definition of LMA, examines the predictive power of potential LMA leading indicators, attempts to determine the likely nature (temporary versus structural) of an LMA episode, and analyzes potential implications of such an assessment on the required degree of adjustment to restore market access. Finally, it highlights the possible application of the methodological framework for identifying emerging risks to market access.
Econometric models. --- Econometrics --- Mathematical models --- Banks and Banking --- Exports and Imports --- Investments: Bonds --- Money and Monetary Policy --- Public Finance --- Interest Rates: Determination, Term Structure, and Effects --- Current Account Adjustment --- Short-term Capital Movements --- International Lending and Debt Problems --- Debt --- Debt Management --- Sovereign Debt --- Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit: General --- General Financial Markets: General (includes Measurement and Data) --- International economics --- Public finance & taxation --- Monetary economics --- Finance --- Investment & securities --- Debt sustainability --- Public debt --- Credit ratings --- Yield curve --- Bonds --- External debt --- Money --- Financial services --- Financial institutions --- Debts, External --- Debts, Public --- Interest rates --- Ukraine
Listing 1 - 3 of 3 |
Sort by
|