Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

The relationship between Matthew, Mark, and Luke is one of the most contested topics in Gospel studies. How do we account for the close similarities--and differences--in the Synoptic Gospels? In the last few decades, the standard answers to the typical questions regarding the Synoptic Problem have come under fire, while new approaches have surfaced. This up-to-date introduction articulates and debates the four major views. Following an overview of the issues, leading proponents of each view set forth their positions and respond to each of the other views. A concluding chapter summarizes the discussion and charts a direction for further study.

Synoptic problem. --- Bible. --- Criticism, interpretation, etc. --- Evangelie (Book of the New Testament) --- Fukuinsho (Books of the New Testament) --- Gospels (Books of the New Testament) --- Gospels, Synoptic (Books of the New Testament) --- Synoptic Gospels (Books of the New Testament) --- 226.1 --- 226.1 Evangelies: synoptici; synoptisch probleem; Q; Quelle --- Evangelies: synoptici; synoptisch probleem; Q; Quelle --- Bible --- Criticism, interpretation, etc --- Synoptic problem

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Two source hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Q hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- 226.1 --- 226.1 Evangelies: synoptici; synoptisch probleem; Q; Quelle --- Evangelies: synoptici; synoptisch probleem; Q; Quelle --- Logia source (Synoptics criticism) --- Q document (Synoptics criticism) --- Sayings source (Synoptics criticism) --- Synoptic problem --- Hypothesis, Two document (Synoptics criticism) --- Hypothesis, Two source (Synoptics criticism) --- Hypothesis, Two sources (Synoptics criticism) --- Two document hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Two sources hypothesis (Synoptics criticism)

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Advocates of the established hypotheses on the origins of the Synoptic gospels and their interrelationships (the Synoptic Problem), and especially those defending or contesting the existence of the "source" (Q), are increasingly being called upon to justify their position with reference to ancient media practices. Still others go so far as to claim that ancient media realities force a radical rethinking of the whole project of Synoptic source criticism, and they question whether traditional documentary approaches remain valid at all. This debate has been hampered to date by the patchy reception of research on ancient media in Synoptic scholarship. Seeking to rectify this problem, Alan Kirk here mounts a defense, grounded in the practices of memory and manuscript transmission in the Roman world, of the Two Document Hypothesis. He shows how ancient media/memory approaches in fact offer new leverage on classic research problems in scholarship on the Synoptic Gospels, and that they have the potential to break the current impasse in the Synoptic Problem. The results of his analysis open up new insights to the early reception and scribal transmission of the Jesus tradition and cast new light on some long-conflicted questions in Christian origins.

Q hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Bible. --- Criticism, interpretation, etc. --- 226.1 --- 226.1 Evangelies: synoptici; synoptisch probleem; Q; Quelle --- Evangelies: synoptici; synoptisch probleem; Q; Quelle --- Logia source (Synoptics criticism) --- Q document (Synoptics criticism) --- Sayings source (Synoptics criticism) --- Synoptic problem --- Two source hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Evangelie volgens Matteus --- Evangelie volgens Matthéüs --- Matʻae pogŭm --- Matai den --- Matai ni yoru fukuinsho --- Matius (Book of the New Testament) --- Mattá --- Matteo (Book of the New Testament) --- Matteus --- Matthäusevangelium --- Matthéüs --- Matthew (Book of the New Testament) --- Matthieu (Book of the New Testament) --- Bible --- Criticism, interpretation, etc

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

A combination of two classic discussions in New Testament scholarship, the contributions in this volume shed light on the still unsolved synoptic problem by using the well-coined concept of rewriting to describe the relationship between the synoptic gospels. The contributions work with the hypothesis that the synoptic tradition can be conceived of as a process of rewriting: Matthew rewrote Mark and Luke rewrote Mark and Matthew. This approach to the synoptic problem dismantles the grounds for the otherwise widely accepted two-source theory. If it can be shown that Luke knew Matthew's Gospel the Q-hypothesis is superfluous. One group of articles focuses on the general question of Luke's literary relation to the other gospels. In these essays, the concept of rewriting describes Luke's use of his sources. The second part of the collection examines a number of texts in order to shown how Luke rewrites specific passages. In the final section the contributions concern Luke's relation to Roman authorities. It is shown that Luke's literary creativity is not limited to his predecessors in the gospel tradition. Rewriting is his literary strategy

Q hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Two source hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Luke, --- Authorship. --- Bible --- Bible. --- Criticism, interpretation, etc --- Criticism, interpretation, etc. --- 226.4 --- 226.1 --- 226.1 Evangelies: synoptici; synoptisch probleem; Q; Quelle --- Evangelies: synoptici; synoptisch probleem; Q; Quelle --- 226.4 Evangelie volgens Lucas --- 226.4 Evangile de S. Luc --- Evangelie volgens Lucas --- Evangile de S. Luc --- Hypothesis, Two document (Synoptics criticism) --- Hypothesis, Two source (Synoptics criticism) --- Hypothesis, Two sources (Synoptics criticism) --- Two document hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Two sources hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Synoptic problem --- Logia source (Synoptics criticism) --- Q document (Synoptics criticism) --- Sayings source (Synoptics criticism) --- Loukas, --- Luc, --- Lukas, --- Λουκας, --- Acts (Book of the New Testament) --- Acts of the Apostles --- Chongdo haengjŏn --- Sado haengjŏn --- Luc (Book of the New Testament) --- Lucas (Book of the New Testament) --- Luka (Book of the New Testament) --- Lukan săn zăn︠g︡g (Book of the New Testament) --- Lukas (Book of the New Testament) --- Luke (Book of the New Testament) --- Lūqā (Book of the New Testament) --- Nuga pogŭm (Book of the New Testament) --- Ruka den --- Ruka ni yoru fukuinsho --- Luke, - Saint - Authorship. --- Luke, - Saint