Listing 1 - 10 of 22 | << page >> |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
The accountability of armed non-state actors is a neglected field of international law, overtaken by the regimes of state responsibility and individual criminal accountability as well as fears of legitimacy. Yet armed non-state actors are important players in the international arena and their activities have significant repercussions. This book focuses on their obligations and accountability when they do not function as state agents, regardless of the existence or extent of accountability of their individual members. The author claims that their distinct features lead to their classification into three different types: de facto entities, armed non-state actors in control of territory, and common article 3 armed non-state actors. The mechanisms that trigger the applicability of humanitarian and human rights law regimes are examined in detail as well as the framework of obligations. In both cases, the author argues that armed non-state actors should not be treated as entering international law and process exclusively through the state. The study concludes by focussing on their accountability in international humanitarian and human rights law and, more specifically, to the rules of attribution, remedies and reparations for violations of their primary obligations.
Choose an application
This book is concerned with the international regulation of non-state armed groups. Specifically, it examines the possibility of subjecting armed groups to international human rights law obligations. First addressed is the means by which armed groups may be bound by international law. Of particular interest is the de facto control theory and the possibility that international law may be applied in the absence of direct treaty regulation. Application of this theory is dependent upon an armed group's establishment of an independent existence, as demonstrated by the displacement of state authority. This means that armed groups are treated as a vertical authority, thereby maintaining the established hierarchy of international regulation. At issue therefore is not a radical approach to the regulation of non-state actors, but rather a modification of the traditional means of application in response to the reality of the situation.The attribution of international human rights law obligations to armed groups is then addressed in light of potential ratione personae restrictions. International human rights law treaties are interpreted in light of the contemporary international context, on the basis that an international instrument has to be applied within the framework of the entire legal system prevailing at the time of interpretation. Armed groups' status as vertical authorities facilitates the vertical application of international human rights law in a manner consistent with both the object and purpose of the law and its foundation in human dignity.Finally, if international human rights law is to be applied to armed groups, its application must be effective in practice. A context-dependent division of responsibility between the territorial state and the armed group is proposed. The respect, protect, fulfil framework is adapted to facilitate the application of human rights obligations in a manner consistent with the control exerted by both the state and the armed group.
Choose an application
Non-state actors (International relations) --- Political violence --- Terrorism --- Security, International --- Anarchism --- Jihad
Choose an application
This book is concerned with the international regulation of non-state armed groups. Specifically, it examines the possibility of subjecting armed groups to international human rights law obligations. First addressed is the means by which armed groups may be bound by international law. Of particular interest is the de facto control theory and the possibility that international law may be applied in the absence of direct treaty regulation. Application of this theory is dependent upon an armed group's establishment of an independent existence, as demonstrated by the displacement of state authority. This means that armed groups are treated as a vertical authority, thereby maintaining the established hierarchy of international regulation. At issue therefore is not a radical approach to the regulation of non-state actors, but rather a modification of the traditional means of application in response to the reality of the situation. The attribution of international human rights law obligations to armed groups is then addressed in light of potential ratione personae restrictions. International human rights law treaties are interpreted in light of the contemporary international context, on the basis that an international instrument has to be applied within the framework of the entire legal system prevailing at the time of interpretation. Armed groups' status as vertical authorities facilitates the vertical application of international human rights law in a manner consistent with both the object and purpose of the law and its foundation in human dignity. Finally, if international human rights law is to be applied to armed groups, its application must be effective in practice. A context-dependent division of responsibility between the territorial state and the armed group is proposed. The respect, protect, fulfil framework is adapted to facilitate the application of human rights obligations in a manner consistent with the control exerted by both the state and the armed group. ''Daragh Murray's book analyses the practical and theoretical difficulties associated with the topic of the international human rights obligations of non-state armed groups by considering the latest developments in this field and suggesting ways forward. His proposals are realistic and carefully argued; this book should be essential reading for anyone grappling with this subject.'' Andrew Clapham, Professor of International Law at the Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies
Choose an application
Adaption --- Begründung der Menschenrechte --- Entstehung der Menschenrechte --- Geltung der Menschenrechte --- Menschenrechte --- Nichtstaatliche Akteure --- Non-state Actors --- Prinzip der Verletzbarkeit --- Religionen --- Universalität
Choose an application
Choose an application
During most of human history, war was a basic instrument of statecraft, considered, for the most part, a lawful, honorable, ennobling, and even romantic pursuit. By contrast, peacemaking remained a marginal and indeed incongruous interstate activity. A war would end when the belligerents ended it.The experience of the twentieth century’s two world wars has changed, at least, the official view. The introduction of ever more destructive weapons, the drastic escalation of civilian deaths, and the economic and environmental devastation that modern war brought combined to forge an international legal impulse to stop, if not prevent, wars, resolve ongoing conflicts, and build peace.Yet stopping a war, though a useful, if not indispensable, step toward making peace, does not lead ineluctably to peace. Nor does the international community’s interposition of “peacekeepers”; their title notwithstanding, peacekeepers only try to keep a stopped war stopped. Making peace is a separate operation, often applying some parts of the same armamentarium but in very different ways.International efforts at stopping wars and making peace, in the era in which such initiatives have become lawful and virtuous, have proved remarkably unsuccessful. Yet the proliferation of ever more destructive weapons, the growing sense of insecurity and expectation of violence, the increasing difficulty of containing wars within a single arena, the threat of breakdown of order, with the prospect of epidemics and mass migration, all work to intensify the demand to stop wars and to make peace.This volume explores these issues by analyzing the theoretical literature on stopping wars and making peace and its application to a number of concrete cases, including the Falklands,Nagorno Karabakh, Rwanda, Malaya, Thailand, and Mozambique. Each case examines one conflict and the efforts undertaken to stop it and transform it into a peace system. The case studies draw general lessons from the incidents studied, extracting guidelines and principles that might serve those called upon to stop wars and make peace and offering a number of instructive points.
Non-state actors (International relations) --- Detention of persons --- Criminal procedure --- NGAs (International relations) --- Non-governmental actors (International relations) --- Nongovernmental actors (International relations) --- Non-state entities (International relations) --- Nonstate entities (International relations) --- Nonstate actors (International relations) --- Associations, institutions, etc. --- International relations --- Law and legislation --- Non-state actors (International relations) - Congresses --- Detention of persons - Congresses
Choose an application
Aggression (International law). --- War (International law). --- Self-defense (International law). --- Combatants and noncombatants (International law). --- Non-state actors (International relations). --- Preemptive attack (Military science). --- Aggression (International law) --- War (International law) --- Self-defense (International law) --- Combatants and noncombatants (International law) --- Non-state actors (International relations) --- Preemptive attack (Military science) --- Anticipatory self-defense (Military science) --- Preemption (Military science) --- Preemptive strikes (Military science) --- Preemptive warfare --- Military art and science --- Strategy --- NGAs (International relations) --- Non-governmental actors (International relations) --- Nongovernmental actors (International relations) --- Non-state entities (International relations) --- Nonstate entities (International relations) --- Nonstate actors (International relations) --- Associations, institutions, etc. --- International relations --- Noncombatants (International law) --- Armed Forces --- Belligerency --- Military law --- International law --- Hostilities --- Neutrality
Choose an application
"De la fin du VIIe siècle jusqu'au Ier siècle av. J.-C., des milliers de guerriers ont quitté l'Europe celtique pour servir les Étrusques, les Carthaginois ou les Grecs, jouant un rôle souvent décisif sur le théâtre des guerres méditerranéennes. Mais quelles sont les raisons qui les ont poussés à migrer ? Leurs départs s'expliquent-ils par la demande étrangère ou par la situation sociale, économique et politique de leurs pays d'origine ? Ou par une conjonction des deux? Quelles influences leurs sociétés ont-elles exercées dans le développement puis le déclin du mercenariat ? Brossant l'évolution des sociétés celtiques durant cette longue période (systèmes agricoles, modes d'accès à la terre, filiation, pouvoir, habitat...), en la liant au phénomène mercenaire, Luc Baray propose des scenarii plausibles. Démêlant les arguments et les hypothèses, il fait le point sur le rôle des "grandes migrations", des crises politiques ou alimentaires, tout en réfléchissant aux effets du mercenariat sur l'émergence et le développement de l'État en Gaule. S'appuyant sur les données archéologiques récentes et sur une nouvelle analyse des données littéraires antiques, l'auteur croise les plans historique, ethnologique et sociologique et offre une approche anthropologique inédite des sociétés celtiques, de leur histoire, de leurs structures et de leurs dynamiques."--Page 4 of cover.
Celts. --- Mercenary troops --- Military art and science --- Celtes --- History --- Europe --- Histoire --- Mercenaires --- Art et science militaires --- Fighting --- Military power --- Military science --- Warfare --- Warfare, Primitive --- Naval art and science --- War --- Mercenaries (Soldiers) --- Troops, Mercenary --- Armies --- Non-state actors (International relations) --- Soldiers --- Foreign enlistment --- Private military companies --- Celtic peoples --- Gaels --- Ethnology --- Indo-Europeans --- Alpine race --- History. --- Celts
Choose an application
Drawing on a range of original, unpublished archival sources, Tozzi highlights the linguistic, religious, cultural, and racial differences that France's experiments with noncitizen soldiers introduced to eighteenth- and nineteenth-century French society. Winner of the Walker Cowen Memorial Prize for an Outstanding Work of Scholarship in Eighteenth-Century Studies.
Napoleonic Wars, 1800-1815 --- Foreign enlistment --- Mercenary troops --- Soldiers, Black --- Jewish soldiers --- Jews as soldiers --- Soldiers --- Black soldiers --- Negro soldiers --- Negroes as soldiers --- Blacks --- Mercenaries (Soldiers) --- Troops, Mercenary --- Armies --- Non-state actors (International relations) --- Private military companies --- Enlistment --- Military offenses --- Napoleonic Wars, 1800-1814 --- Participation, Foreign. --- History. --- France. --- France combattante. --- History --- France --- History, Military --- Black people
Listing 1 - 10 of 22 | << page >> |
Sort by
|