Listing 1 - 4 of 4 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Sitzen ist ein Phänomen, das in den Sozial-, Geistes- und Kulturwissenschaften bislang kaum Beachtung fand. Lisa Landsteiners Studie rekapituliert nicht nur den aktuellen und interdisziplinären Diskursstand, sondern stützt sich auch auf ein ausgefeiltes Forschungsdesign, das Akteur_innen, die sich im Raum der Psychiatrie bewegen, fokussiert. Die empirisch gewonnenen Daten werden zu einem theoretischen Modell des Sitzens verdichtet, das interdisziplinär anschlussfähig ist und sich auf eine Vielzahl von psychologischen Nachbardisziplinen ausweiten lässt. »Was alltäglich erscheint, bekommt in der Studie Landsteiners seine ursprüngliche Bedeutung zurück.« Christoph Müller, Psychiatrische Pflege, 46/3 (2018) Besprochen in: PSYNDEX, 7 (2017)
Sitting position. --- Human mechanics --- Posture --- Psychologie; Psychiatrie; Psychotherapie; Historische Anthropologie; Interdisziplinarität; Körper; Sitzen; Stuhl; Setting; Körperhaltung; Hybridisierung; Performativität; Psychoanalyse; Medizin; Sozialpsychologie; Kulturanthropologie; Psychology; Psychiatry; Psychotherapy; Historical Anthropology; Interdisciplinarity; Body; Sitting; Chair; Hybridization; Performativity; Psychoanalysis; Medicine; Social Psychology; Cultural Anthropology --- Body. --- Chair. --- Cultural Anthropology. --- Historical Anthropology. --- Hybridization. --- Interdisciplinarity. --- Medicine. --- Performativity. --- Psychiatry. --- Psychoanalysis. --- Psychotherapy. --- Setting. --- Sitting. --- Social Psychology.
Choose an application
From its beginnings, the theory of evolution has unsettled fundamental anthropological assumptions about the place of human beings in nature. The integration of human origins into natural history by Darwinism was countered by the philosophical anthropologies of the 20th century. Their attempts were to hold on even more resolutely to the special status of humans as beings 'open towards the world'. Today, evolutionary and philosophical anthropology have moved closer together via the paradigm of embodiment. Building on embodied cognitive science, this volume aims to establish how far the human mind and human cultural cognition can be attributed to the structures of human existence, structures which have emerged in the course of evolution and have in turn been affected by culture. The traditional dualism of nature and culture is transformed into an explanation of an evolutionary process in which body and mind are understood to be intertwined and mutually constitutive.
Evolution. --- Culture. --- Cultural sociology --- Culture --- Sociology of culture --- Social aspects --- Civilization --- Popular culture --- Philosophy --- Creation --- Emergence (Philosophy) --- Teleology --- Mind and body. --- Cognition and culture. --- Human body --- Social aspects. --- Symbolic aspects. --- Symbolic aspects of the human body --- Symbolism --- Culture and cognition --- Cognition --- Ethnophilosophy --- Ethnopsychology --- Socialization --- Body and mind --- Body and soul (Philosophy) --- Mind --- Mind-body connection --- Mind-body relations --- Mind-cure --- Somatopsychics --- Brain --- Dualism --- Philosophical anthropology --- Holistic medicine --- Mental healing --- Parousia (Philosophy) --- Phrenology --- Psychophysiology --- Self --- Psychological aspects --- Human body |x Social aspects. --- Anthropology --- cognitive science --- enactivism --- interdisciplinary research --- cultural anthropology --- historical anthropology --- Kulturphilosophie --- Allgemeines --- Phänomenologie --- Anthropologie
Choose an application
The divine kingship and chiefship of the Asante people of central Ghana have been undergoing a shift towards secularization since the start of the colonial era. Timo Kallinen maintains that a close examination of this transformation provides us with a better understanding of secularization processes in Ghana more broadly, and in other post-colonial societies whose historical development likewise differs from that of the modern West, and which have largely confronted secular modernity through encounters with European colonialism. Throughout the volume secularization is understood as a process in modern society whereby divinity is separated from the ways in which both human society is regulated and physical nature is understood to function. Divine Rulers in a Secular State has been divided into three thematic parts, each with a short theoretical introduction. In the first two, analysis is primarily inspired by the work of Louis Dumont, while in the third the theoretical ideas of Webb Keane and Bruno Latour are of central importance. The undifferentiated order of the pre-colonial Asante kingdom, in which the chiefly and priestly functions of the rulers were not separated, comprises the initial focus. Sacrifices and marriage exchanges, both of which were directed at establishing and perpetuating relations between the living and the spirits of the dead ancestors, are posited as the most important responsibilities of the chief. Also explored are perceptions that the founding of the kingdom and its authority structure are the results of sacrifices offered to various gods by the Asante king and his chiefs. The second part examines the dissolution of the traditional order since the onset of British colonial occupation. The secularization process was initiated by the aspirations of colonial administrators and missionary bodies who aimed to maintain Christian converts under the ‘political’ authority of their non-Christian chiefs, who were still important ritual leaders. Consequently, it was necessary to start dividing society along ‘political’ and ‘religious’ lines so that only the former was a mandatory concern for all. The kernel of modern citizenship was planted at the same time as the ‘religious’ conscience of individuals started to shape their rights and duties towards their ‘political’ rulers. Furthermore, theories about Asante as a state based on contract and representation were proposed and developed. In the post-colonial era chiefship has been put into the service of the independent nation state - both as an instrument of administration and a nationalistic symbol, while, most recently, chiefs have been depicted as leaders in civil society, even receiving support from global developmental organizations. Yet traditional chieftaincy is strongly criticized by certain Christian groups belonging to the Pentecostal-Charismatic movement, which still see it as integrally linked to traditional cosmologies. The third part of the book takes the discussion beyond the separation of the categories of religion and politics. Secularization has also has also entailed the dematerialization of religion, establishing it as something that ought to be understood primarily as mental or spiritual; in a secular society 'things' like deities, witchcraft, or sacrifices should not be recognized as proper agents and actions at the level of immanent relations. In Ghana such views are effectively contradicted by religious groups which see spiritual forces as the most powerful agents in social relations. The cases discussed deal with attempted state control of anti-witchcraft activities, the efficiency of protective magic during political upheavals, and Pentecostal notions of demonic influences in secular politics. The Conclusions section brings the themes of the book together by discussing the large-scale effects of the secular project in contemporary Ghanaian society. Research is based on anthropological fieldwork conducted in Ghana in 2000-2001 and 2005-2006, data drawn from several archival sources located in Ghana and the United Kingdom, and the anthropological and historical literature on Ghana and the Asante.
Ashanti (African people) --- Ethnology --- Ethnohistory --- Secularism. --- History --- Kings and rulers --- Ghana --- Ashanti (Kingdom) --- Kings and rulers. --- Colonial influence. --- Ethnohistorical method --- Historical anthropology --- Historical ethnology --- Anthropology --- Achanti (African people) --- Asante (African people) --- Asanti (African people) --- Ashante Twi (African people) --- Ashantee (African people) --- Ashantis (African people) --- Akan (African people) --- Ethics --- Irreligion --- Utilitarianism --- Atheism --- Postsecularism --- Secularization (Theology) --- Methodology --- Asante (Kingdom) --- Chia-na --- Gana --- Republic of Ghana --- Ganah --- Government of Ghana --- Rèpublica du Gana --- Qana --- Qana Respublikası --- Gana ka Fasojamana --- Republik Ghana --- Гана --- Gana Respublikaḣy --- Hana (Ghana) --- Рэспубліка Гана --- Rėspublika Hana --- Република Гана --- Republika Gana --- Ghanská republika --- Gweriniaeth Ghana --- Gáana --- Ghana Vabariik --- Γκάνα --- Gkana --- Δημοκρατία της Γκάνας --- Dēmokratia tēs Gkanas --- República de Ghana --- Ganao --- Ghanako Errepublika --- Tjóðveldið Gana --- République du Ghana --- Poblacht Ghána --- Yn Ghaney --- Ghaney --- Pobblaght ny Ganey --- Poblachd Ghàna --- Ганмудин Орн --- Ganmudin Orn --- 가나 --- 가나 공화국 --- Gana Konghwaguk --- Ochíchìíwú Ghana --- Ганæ --- Ganæ --- Республикæ Ганæ --- Respublikæ Ganæ --- IGana --- Repubblica del Ghana --- גאנה --- רפובליקת גאנה --- Republiḳat Ganah --- ガーナ --- Togoland (British) --- Gold Coast --- Ashanti --- Northern Territories of the Gold Coast
Choose an application
turkic world --- tatars --- identity --- tatar history --- tatar anthropology --- ethnical cultures --- Tatars --- Ethnohistory --- Ethnic relations. --- Ethnohistory. --- Tatars. --- History --- Tatarstan (Russia) --- Russia (Federation) --- Ethnic relations --- Tartars --- Ethnology --- Mongols --- Turkic peoples --- Kereyid (Asian people) --- Ethnohistorical method --- Historical anthropology --- Historical ethnology --- Anthropology --- Inter-ethnic relations --- Interethnic relations --- Relations among ethnic groups --- Acculturation --- Assimilation (Sociology) --- Ethnic groups --- Social problems --- Sociology --- Minorities --- Race relations --- Methodology --- Pravitelʹstvo Respubliki Tatarstan --- Eluosi (Federation) --- Federation of Russia --- Federazione della Russia --- Federazione russa --- O-lo-ssu (Federation) --- OKhU --- Orosyn Kholboony Uls --- Pravitelʹstvo RF --- Pravitelʹstvo Rossii --- Pravitelʹstvo Rossiĭskoĭ Federat͡sii --- RF --- Roshia Renp --- Rosiĭsʹka Federat͡sii͡ --- Rosja (Federation) --- Rossii͡a (Federation) --- Rossiĭskai͡a Federat͡sii͡ --- Rossiya (Federation) --- Rossiyskaya Federatsiya --- Russian Federation --- Russian S.F.S.R. --- Russische Föderation --- Urysye Federat͡sie --- Respublika Tatarstan (Russia) --- Republic of Tatarstan (Russia) --- Tatarstan Respublikasy (Russia) --- Tatarstan Republic (Russia) --- Pravitelʹstvo Respubliki Tatarstan (Russia) --- Татарстан (Russia) --- Республика Татарстан (Russia) --- Татарстан Республикасы (Russia) --- Правительство Республики Татарстан (Russia) --- Tatarstan Respublikası (Russia) --- Republik Tatarstan (Russia) --- Republiek van Tartarstan (Russia) --- تتارستان (Russia) --- Tatāristān (Russia) --- Татаристан (Russia) --- Татарстан Республикаhы (Russia) --- Tatarstan Respublikaḣy (Russia) --- Republika Tatarstan (Russia) --- Татаар Республика (Russia) --- Tataar Respublika (Russia) --- Tatarskai︠a︡ A.S.S.R. (R.S.F.S.R.) --- Pravitelʹstvo Rossiĭskoĭ Federat︠s︡ii --- Roshia Renpō --- Rosiĭsʹka Federat︠s︡ii︠a︡ --- Rossii︠a︡ (Federation) --- Rossiĭskai︠a︡ Federat︠s︡ii︠a︡ --- Urysye Federat︠s︡ie --- Ethnohistoire --- Turcs (Peuples) --- Histoire --- Altaic peoples --- Pravitelʹstvo RF --- Pravitelʹstvo Rossii --- Pravitelʹstvo RossiiÌskoiÌ Federatï¸ s︡ii --- Roshia RenpoÌ --- RosiiÌsʹka Federatï¸ s︡iiï¸ a︡ --- Rossiiï¸ a︡ (Federation) --- RossiiÌskaiï¸ a︡ Federatï¸ s︡iiï¸ a︡ --- Russische FoÌderation --- Urysye Federatï¸ s︡ie
Listing 1 - 4 of 4 |
Sort by
|