Listing 1 - 7 of 7 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
The first historically informed, theoretically rich and empirically detailed study of what Occupy has called the 1%.
Distributive justice. --- Income distribution. --- Wealth --- Equality --- Economics --- Social aspects. --- Economic aspects. --- Political aspects. --- Wealth. --- Distribution (Economic theory)
Choose an application
Economic conditions. Economic development --- Distributive justice. --- Income distribution. --- Wealth --- Equality --- Economics --- Social aspects. --- Economic aspects. --- Political aspects.
Choose an application
Een theorie van rechtvaardigheid van John Rawls is misschien wel het meest invloedrijke werk op het gebied van moraalfilosofie en politieke filosofie uit de twintigste eeuw. Dit boek heeft niet alleen op filosofen en andere academici een onuitwisbare indruk gemaakt, maar ook buiten de universiteit op politieke essayisten, juristen, politici en mensen uit de burgerrechtenbeweging. In Nederland en België speelt het tot op de dag van vandaag een voorname rol in politieke debatten over het beleid dat zou moeten worden nagestreefd in een liberaal-democratische verzorgingsstaaat. Een theorie van rechtvaardigheid (1971) is het hoofdwerk van Rawls. Het boek werd in 27 talen vertaald. De Nederlandse vertaling volgt de volledig herziene Harvard-editie uit 1999.
rechtvaardigheid (rechtvaardigheidsprincipe, distributieve rechtvaardigheid) --- justice (principe de justice, justice distributive, justice sociale) --- Rechtsfilosofie --- Social ethics --- Political philosophy. Social philosophy --- Legal theory and methods. Philosophy of law --- Politieke filosofie
Choose an application
G. A. Cohen was one of the world's leading political theorists. He was noted, in particular, for his contributions to the literature of egalitarian justice. Cohen's classic writings offer one of the most influential responses to the currency of the egalitarian justice question - the question, that is, of whether egalitarians should seek to equalize welfare, resources, opportunity, or some other indicator of well-being. Underlying Cohen's argument is the intuition that the purpose of egalitarianism is to eliminate disadvantage for which it is inappropriate to hold the person responsible. His argument therefore focuses on the appropriate role of considerations regarding responsibility in egalitarian judgment. This volume comprises chapters by major scholars addressing and responding both to Cohen's account of the currency of egalitarian justice and its practical implications and to Cohen's arguments regarding the appropriate form of justificatory arguments about justice.
Distributive justice. --- Equality. --- Egalitarianism --- Inequality --- Social equality --- Social inequality --- Political science --- Sociology --- Democracy --- Liberty --- Distribution (Economic theory) --- Justice --- Social justice --- Wealth --- Moral and ethical aspects --- Cohen, G. A. --- Cohen, Gerald Allan, --- Cohen, Jerry, --- Distributive justice --- Equality --- Cohen, G. A. - (Gerald Allan), - 1941-2009
Choose an application
Economic inequality is one of the most divisive issues of our time. Yet few would argue that inequality is a greater evil than poverty. The poor suffer because they don't have enough, not because others have more, and some have far too much. So why do many people appear to be more distressed by the rich than by the poor?In this provocative book, the #1 New York Times bestselling author of On Bullshit presents a compelling and unsettling response to those who believe that the goal of social justice should be economic equality or less inequality. Harry Frankfurt, one of the most influential moral philosophers in the world, argues that we are morally obligated to eliminate poverty-not achieve equality or reduce inequality. Our focus should be on making sure everyone has a sufficient amount to live a decent life. To focus instead on inequality is distracting and alienating.At the same time, Frankfurt argues that the conjunction of vast wealth and poverty is offensive. If we dedicate ourselves to making sure everyone has enough, we may reduce inequality as a side effect. But it's essential to see that the ultimate goal of justice is to end poverty, not inequality.A serious challenge to cherished beliefs on both the political left and right, On Inequality promises to have a profound impact on one of the great debates of our time.
Equality --- Distributive justice --- Income distribution --- Distribution of income --- Income inequality --- Inequality of income --- Distribution (Economic theory) --- Disposable income --- Justice --- Social justice --- Wealth --- Egalitarianism --- Inequality --- Social equality --- Social inequality --- Political science --- Sociology --- Democracy --- Liberty --- Philosophy --- Moral and ethical aspects
Choose an application
Economic inequality is one of the most divisive issues of our time. Yet few would argue that inequality is a greater evil than poverty. The poor suffer because they don't have enough, not because others have more, and some have far too much. So why do many people appear to be more distressed by the rich than by the poor ? In this provocative book, the #1 New York Times bestselling author of On Bullshit presents a compelling and unsettling response to those who believe that the goal of social justice should be economic equality or less inequality. Harry Frankfurt, one of the most influential moral philosophers in the world, argues that we are morally obligated to eliminate poverty--not achieve equality or reduce inequality. Our focus should be on making sure everyone has a sufficient amount to live a decent life. To focus instead on inequality is distracting and alienating. At the same time, Frankfurt argues that the conjunction of vast wealth and poverty is offensive. If we dedicate ourselves to making sure everyone has enough, we may reduce inequality as a side effect. But it's essential to see that the ultimate goal of justice is to end poverty, not inequality. A serious challenge to cherished beliefs on both the political left and right, On Inequality promises to have a profound impact on one of the great debates of our time.
General ethics --- Aesthetics --- Philosophy and psychology of culture --- Economic schools --- Burke, Edmund --- Income distribution --- Distributive justice --- Equality --- Philosophy --- Distributive justice. --- Income distribution. --- Philosophy. --- Russian literature --- Postmodernism (Literature) --- Littérature russe --- Postmodernisme (Littérature) --- History and criticism. --- Histoire et critique --- Thought and thinking --- Nancy, Jean-Luc --- Interviews --- Tyradellis, Daniel --- 1.07 --- Nancy, Jean-Luc °1940 (°Caudéron, Bordeaux, Frankrijk) --- Cultuurfilosofie --- Filosofie ; filosofen (A - Z) --- Buddhist philosophy --- Philosophical anthropology --- ethiek --- Metaphysics. --- God --- Ontology --- Philosophy of mind --- Whitehead, Alfred North, --- Political scientists --- Statesmen --- Burke, Edmund, --- Great Britain --- Politics and government --- Equality - Philosophy --- Recherche --- Sciences --- Objectivité --- Différence (philosophie) --- Metaphysics --- Science --- Objectivity. --- Social aspects. --- Philosophie des sciences. --- Objectivité. --- Sciences et société.
Choose an application
This book assesses the rapid transformation of the political agency of religious groups within transnational civil society under conditions of globalization weakening sovereign nation-states. It offers a synthesis of the resurgence of Jasper’s axial thesis from distinct lines of research initiated by Eisenstadt, Habermas, Taylor, Bellah, and others. It explores the concept of cosmoipolitanism from the combined perspectives of sociology of religion, critical theory, secularization theory, and evolutionary cultural anthropology. At the theoretical level, cosmoipolitanism prescribes how local, national, transnational, global, and virtual spaces ought publically to engage in transcivilizational discourse without presuming the secular assumptions tied to cosmopolitanism. Employing insights of critical theory, this book offers a micro-level analysis of the pragmatics of discourse of each axial tradition contributing to the role of religion within multiple modernities. While circumscribing the particular historical limits of each tradition, the book extends their internal claims to species universality in light of the potential for boundless communication Jaspers saw initiated with the Axial Age. In Jon Bowman's novel and important work, he rethinks the challenges of global justice. Bowman is not just concerned with global justice in the modern world, but with a genealogy that begins with a better understanding of the Axial age, one that is also the unique signature of cosmoi-political institutions. Arguing with depth and precision, Bowman challenges Kantian and Rawlsian universalism. His argument provides a new interpretation of cosmopolitan justice as he explores the deeper roots of cosmopolitan justice. James Bohman Saint Louis University Jon Bowman’s Cosmoipolitan Justice is an important, innovative and timely work. Construing globality in terms of pervasive conditions of worldwide interdependence, Bowman advances a decidedly pluralistic account of cosmopolitanism, one uniquely shaped by recent theories of multiple modernities. His analysis is sustained by a highly informed appropriation of such diverse thinkers as Theodor Adorno, Abudullah An-Naim, Talad Asad, Schmuel Eisenstadt, Jürgen Habermas, Karl Jaspers, John Rawls, Amartya Sen, and Charles Taylor. One special feature is the book’s synthesis of research on global governance with that on post-secularity and the place of religion in the public sphere. On this basis Bowman presents a distinctive account of the world’s axial religions, one underwriting a multi-polar, intercultural global public realm able to address social, political, and economic issues confronting the global community today. This book should be of great interest to students and scholars in philosophy, political theory, international relations, sociology, and religious studies. Professor Andrew Buchwalter Department of Philosophy University of North Florida.
Philosophy. --- Political Philosophy. --- Political Science, general. --- Private International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law. --- Philosophy of Religion. --- Philosophy of the Social Sciences. --- Non-Western Philosophy. --- Philosophy (General). --- Philosophy, modern. --- Social sciences --- Political science --- Philosophie --- Sciences sociales --- Science politique --- Political science_xPhilosophy. --- Social sciences_xPhilosophy. --- Business & Economics --- Philosophy & Religion --- Economic Theory --- Philosophy --- Distributive justice. --- Wealth --- Moral and ethical aspects. --- Wealth, Ethics of --- Political science. --- Religion --- Philosophy and social sciences. --- Political philosophy. --- Philosophy, Asian. --- Private international law. --- Conflict of laws. --- International law. --- Comparative law. --- Political Science. --- Business ethics --- Distribution (Economic theory) --- Justice --- Social justice --- Moral and ethical aspects --- Private International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law . --- Asian philosophy --- Oriental philosophy --- Philosophy, Oriental --- Social philosophy --- Social theory --- Mental philosophy --- Humanities --- Administration --- Civil government --- Commonwealth, The --- Government --- Political theory --- Political thought --- Politics --- Science, Political --- State, The --- Political philosophy --- Religion—Philosophy. --- Social sciences and philosophy --- Choice of law --- Conflict of laws --- Intermunicipal law --- International law, Private --- International private law --- Private international law --- Law --- Legal polycentricity --- Civil law
Listing 1 - 7 of 7 |
Sort by
|