Listing 1 - 7 of 7 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Securities industry --- Self-regulation --- Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.
Choose an application
Securities fraud --- Securities industry --- Government policy --- United States.
Choose an application
Swaps (Finance) --- Securities industry --- Clearing of securities. --- Indemnity against liability --- Law and legislation --- Information services
Choose an application
This title surveys the law and policy of regulating information flows in capital markets. Part I begins with an overview of the themes, regulatory principles, and challenges that animate information policy, and describes the principal industry, self-regulatory, and regulatory bodies that participate in the governance of information flows in capital markets. Part II articulates several objectives of information policy in capital markets - ensuring transparency and access, promoting standardisation and higher orders of meaning, and upholding integrity.
Capital market --- Securities industry --- Disclosure of information --- Data protection --- Financial services industry --- Law and legislation --- Information systems --- E-books
Choose an application
This paper discusses key findings of the Detailed Assessment of Observance of the Insurance Core Principles on the United States. The assessment finds a reasonable level of observance of the Insurance Core Principles. There are many areas of strength, including at state level the powerful capacity for financial analysis with peer group review and challenge through the processes of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners. Lead state regulation is developing and a network of international supervisory colleges has been put in place. Key areas for development include the valuation standard of the state regulators, especially for life insurance, and group capital standards.
Banks and banking -- State supervision -- United States. --- Finance -- United States -- Evaluation. --- Securities industry -- State supervision -- United States. --- Securities industry -- State supervision. --- Finance --- Business & Economics --- International Finance --- Insurance --- Macroeconomics --- Public Finance --- Industries: Financial Services --- Business and Financial --- Pension Funds --- Non-bank Financial Institutions --- Financial Instruments --- Institutional Investors --- Insurance Companies --- Actuarial Studies --- General Financial Markets: Government Policy and Regulation --- Labor Economics: General --- Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue: General --- Insurance & actuarial studies --- Financial services law & regulation --- Labour --- income economics --- Public finance & taxation --- Insurance companies --- Insurance supervision --- Labor --- Legal support in revenue administration --- Financial institutions --- Financial regulation and supervision --- Revenue administration --- Nonbank financial institutions --- Law and legislation --- Labor economics --- Revenue --- United States --- Income economics
Choose an application
The recent financial crisis led to sweeping reforms that inspired countless references to the financial reforms of the New Deal. Comparable to the reforms of the New Deal in both scope and scale, the 2,300-page Dodd-Frank Act of 2010-the main regulatory reform package introduced in the United States-also shared with New Deal reforms the assumption that the underlying cause of the crisis was misbehavior by securities market participants, exacerbated by lax regulatory oversight. With Wasting a Crisis, Paul G. Mahoney offers persuasive research to show that this now almost universally accepted narrative of market failure-broadly similar across financial crises-is formulated by political actors hoping to deflect blame from prior policy errors. Drawing on a cache of data, from congressional investigations, litigation, regulatory reports, and filings to stock "es from the 1920s and '30s, Mahoney moves beyond the received wisdom about the financial reforms of the New Deal, showing that lax regulation was not a substantial cause of the financial problems of the Great Depression. As new regulations were formed around this narrative of market failure, not only were the majority largely ineffective, they were also often counterproductive, consolidating market share in the hands of leading financial firms. An overview of twenty-first-century securities reforms from the same analytic perspective, including Dodd-Frank and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, shows a similar pattern and suggests that they too may offer little benefit to investors and some measurable harm.
Securities industry --- Law and legislation --- History --- financial crisis, reform, new deal, dodd frank act, regulation, securities market, oversight, great depression, nonfiction, history, economics, economy, political science, monopoly, consolidation, sarbanes oxley, investment, progressives, interest groups, progressive era, sec, disclosure, finance, recession, government, intervention, law, legal.
Choose an application
This book is dedicated to the Law and Economics analysis of civil liability of securities underwriters for the damage caused by material misstatements of corporate information by securities issuers. It starts by looking at securities underwriters from a practical and business perspective and asserting that they are undeniably indispensable and central figures in the process of securities offering. From the economics point of view, their main value comes from their ability to monitor the issuer's disclosure during the distribution of securities to ensure that such disclosure does not contain materially misleading statements or omissions and to take preventive action if needed. This is known as the gatekeeping function of securities underwriters. Further it is investigated whether there is a need for additional incentives for securities underwriters in order to make them perform the gatekeeping function well as different market-based and legal enforcement mechanisms already in existence. To determine the expected civil liability, this book considers five main components of liability regimes in the USA, the EU, the Netherlands and the UK: potential parties to a dispute, the liability standard, the measure of damages, the procedural rules, and the nature of the liability rules. This analysis leads to the conclusion that in all of these countries the expected civil liability threat is likely to be insufficient to encourage meaningful compliance by securities underwriters and there might be a systematic under enforcement of the underwriter's gatekeeping function. As a possible solution to the drawbacks of existing underwriter civil liability systems in each of the countries analysed, it is suggested there should be a switch from the current negligence liability to strict liability. This should be coupled with the placing the burden of proof of loss causation on the plaintiff and capping damages by the amount of the underwriting fee.
Tort and negligence --- European Union --- France --- United States --- Netherlands --- Aandelen --- Aansprakelijkheid (Recht) --- Aansprakelijkheidsrecht --- Beurswaarden --- Blue sky laws --- Capitalisation --- Capitalization (Finance) --- Capitaux mobiliers --- Courtage en valeurs mobilières --- Effecten --- Liability (Law) --- Portfolio --- Public securities --- Responsabilité (Droit) --- Responsabilité juridique --- Responsabilité légale --- Scrip --- Securities --- Securities law --- Shares --- Sociétés--Titres --- Titres (Bourse) --- Titres (Finances) --- Underwriting --- Valeurs --- Valeurs boursieres --- Valeurs cotées --- Valeurs mobilieres --- Valeurs non cotées --- Securities industry --- Securities fraud --- Disclosure of information --- Investment Banking. --- Law and legislation --- USA. --- Accountability --- Legal responsibility --- Responsibility (Law) --- Responsibility [Legal ] --- Etats-Unis --- Royaume-Uni --- Pays-Bas --- United States of America
Listing 1 - 7 of 7 |
Sort by
|