Listing 1 - 7 of 7 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Alvin Plantinga’s Warranted Christian Belief has very quickly become one of the most influential books in philosophy of religion. In this collection of essays, German philosophers, theologians and a mathematician deal critically with several aspects of Plantinga’s seminal work. In a long essay, Plantinga answers to these critics.
Apologetics. --- Christianity --- Faith and reason --- Apologetics --- Apologetics, Missionary --- Christian evidences --- Evidences, Christian --- Evidences of Christianity --- Fundamental theology --- Polemics (Theology) --- Theology, Fundamental --- Religious thought --- Theology --- Philosophy. --- Christianity. --- Evidences --- Plantinga, Alvin.
Choose an application
In der frühneuzeitlichen Gelehrtenkultur herrschte ein großes Bewusstsein für die Funktion bestimmter Textsorten und ihrer genuinen, zweckgebundenen Verwendungsweise, die sich nicht zuletzt auch an rhetorischen Traditionen orientierte. Das trifft auch auf den Bereich der Verteidigungsschriften, hier vornehmlich der Apologie und der Vindicatio, zu. Beide stehen im Bezugsrahmen gelehrter Streitigkeiten, die in jüngster Zeit vermehrt in den Blick genommen wurden. Allein dominierten bisher Fragestellungen, die sich in erster Linie an Inhalten orientierten. Die Formen und je eigenen Textsorten gelehrten Streitens kamen bisher nicht genauer in den Blick. Die hier zusammengetragenen Analysen nehmen das rhetorische Erbe und die Sensibilität der Gelehrten der Epoche der Frühen Neuzeit für die Verwendung bestimmter Schreibweisen zu ihrem Ausgangspunkt, um agonale Positionsbestimmungen im gelehrten Diskurs in ihren Kontexten verständlich zu machen. Die hier versammelten Beiträge aus Philosophie, Philologie, Theologie und Geschichte zeigen erstmals, dass Verteidigungsschriften in den seltensten Fällen rein defensiv waren, vielmehr eignete ihnen ein ebenso offensives, mitunter gar aggressives Moment.
Apologetics --- Apologetics, Missionary --- Christian evidences --- Christianity --- Evidences, Christian --- Evidences of Christianity --- Fundamental theology --- Polemics (Theology) --- Theology, Fundamental --- Religious thought --- Theology --- History --- Evidences --- Early Modern Period. --- polemic writings. --- scholarly culture.
Choose an application
Selon Tillich, l’apologétique signifie « défendre » la foi chrétienne lorsqu’elle est menacée, et en « répondre » devant des adversaires. Dès lors, dans le contexte d’une culture en voie de sécularisation, où la religion se trouve de plus en plus contestée dans ses prétentions à organiser et à régir la société, il était normal que l’apologétique occupe une place importante dans la réflexion théologique.Chez Tillich, on note une évolution importante dans sa manière d’envisager cette notion. En effet, loin de proposer une approche purement dualiste de l’apologétique, qui opposerait par exemple la vérité chrétienne au doute athée, Tillich cherchera toujours à rencontrer son interlocuteur athée sur un « terrain commun » d’entente. Ce critère du terrain commun sera d’ailleurs le critère fondamental de sa compréhension de l’apologétique, même si cette dernière se reconfigure de différentes manières au fil du temps. En effet, d’autres critères seront également parfois soulignés, surtout durant toute la période allemande de son enseignement. Pour montrer les convergences et les discontinuités dans cette compréhension de l’apologétique, nous avons envisagé la recherche de manière chronologique, en nous basant sur les principaux textes qui abordaient explicitement le terme « apologétique ». Le résultat de notre recherche fut alors de constater qu’il existait deux grands paradigmes dans la compréhension tillichienne de l’apologétique, à savoir : une apologétique de l’attaque et une apologétique de la réponse. Schématiquement, nous rattacherons la première à la période allemande de son enseignement, et la seconde à la période américaine. Il faut aussi noter que notre recherche commence par aborder la question de l’apologétique à partir des écrits de l’année 1913, c’est-à-dire des écrits antérieurs à la période d’enseignement allemande, qu'elle contient également une reprise à rebours de son sujet, via une étude des rapports entre Tillich et Barth, qui mettent en jeu la possibilité, ou non, d’une démarche de type apologétique, et qu'elle ouvre à la question du dialogue interreligieux, ainsi qu'à une actualisation de la question apologétique.
Apologetics. --- 2 TILLICH, PAUL --- 239 --- Apologetics --- Apologetics, Missionary --- Christian evidences --- Christianity --- Evidences, Christian --- Evidences of Christianity --- Fundamental theology --- Polemics (Theology) --- Theology, Fundamental --- Religious thought --- Theology --- Godsdienst. Theologie--TILLICH, PAUL --- Apologetica. Polemische, controversiële theologie. Verdediging van het christendom --- Evidences --- Tillich, Paul, --- Tillich, Paulus J., --- Dilixi, --- Tīllīsh, Pal, --- تيليش، پل --- 2 TILLICH, PAUL Godsdienst. Theologie--TILLICH, PAUL --- Tillich, Paul --- Apologétique. --- attack. --- attaque / Apologetic. --- paradox. --- paradoxe. --- response. --- réponse.
Choose an application
Atheists generated widespread anxieties between the Reformation and the Enlightenment. In response to such anxieties a distinct genre of religious apologetics emerged in England between 1580 and 1720. By examining the form and the content of the confutation of atheism, Anti-Atheism in Early Modern England demonstrates the prevalence of patterned assumptions and arguments about who an atheist was and what an atheist was supposed to believe, outlines and analyzes the major arguments against atheists, and traces the important changes and challenges to this apologetic discourse in the early Enlightenment.
Christian apologetics --- Christian church history --- Great Britain --- Apologetics --- Atheism --- Christianity and atheism. --- Apologétique --- Athéisme --- Christianisme et athéisme --- History --- Histoire --- England --- Angleterre --- Church history. --- Histoire religieuse --- History of the United Kingdom and Ireland --- anno 1500-1799 --- Philosophy --- Agnosticism --- Free thought --- Irreligion --- Religion --- Secularism --- Theism --- Atheism and Christianity --- Apologetics, Missionary --- Christian evidences --- Christianity --- Evidences, Christian --- Evidences of Christianity --- Fundamental theology --- Polemics (Theology) --- Theology, Fundamental --- Religious thought --- Theology --- History. --- Evidences
Choose an application
Christian religion --- Apologetics --- Apologetics [Missionary ] --- Apologetics--19th century --- Apologetics--20th century --- Apologetiek --- Apologetiek--19e eeuw --- Apologetiek--20e eeuw --- Apologétique --- Apologétique--19e siècle --- Apologétique--20e siècle --- Christelijke geloofswaarheden --- Christelijke waarheiden --- Christendom--Apologetische literatuur --- Christendom--Geloofswaarheden --- Christian evidences --- Christianisme--Vérités de foi --- Christianity--Apologetic works --- Christianity--Evidences --- Evidences [Christian] --- Evidences of christianity --- Fundamentele theologie --- Geloofswaarheden [Christelijke ] --- Identificatie (Godsdienst) --- Identification (Religion) --- Identiteit (Godsdienst) --- Identity (Religion) --- Identité (Religion) --- Polemics (Theology) --- Polemieken (Theologie) --- Preuves du Christianisme --- Religious identity --- Réalisation de soi (Religion) --- Self-realization (Religion) --- Theologie [Fundamentele ] --- Theology [Fundamental] --- Théologie fondamentale --- Vérités de foi (Christianisme) --- Waarheden [Christelijke ] --- Zelfrealisatie (Godsdienst) --- 282 --- #GGSB: Ecclesiologie --- Katholieke Kerk. Rooms-katholieken --- Catholic Church --- History. --- Ecclesiologie
Choose an application
"Until the mid-1960s, while most commentators of the Gospel of John were aware of a polemic against 'the Jews,' they did not consider it with reference to contemporary ethical discussion. A shift in focus in Johannine scholarship is noticeable from the mid-1960s and 1970s to the present, where commentators began to connect the Gospel's polemic against 'the Jews' with potential anti-Judaism in the text. As yet, very little work has been done to answer the question of how this change in sensitivity came about. This book is a historiography of one scholar's growing awareness of potential anti-Judaism in the Gospel of John with the intention of using this individual history to explain the larger trend in biblical studies. Sonya Cronin examines the published work of Raymond Brown, a prominent Catholic New Testament scholar, between the years 1960-1998. The book contextualizes Brown's work by evaluating the impact of ecclesiastical statements and the influence of earlier and contemporary Johannine scholarship on Brown's biblical interpretation, and then posits theories as to why change occurs at specific times."--Bloomsbury Publishing Until the mid-1960s, most commentators of the Gospel of John were aware of a polemic against 'the Jews,' yet they did not consider it with reference to contemporary ethical discussion. A shift in focus in Johannine scholarship is noticeable from the mid-1960s and 1970s to the present, where commentators began to connect the Gospel's polemic against 'the Jews' with potential anti-Judaism in the text. As yet, very little work has been done to answer the question of how this change in sensitivity came about. This book is a historiography of one scholar's growing awareness of potential anti-Judaism in the Gospel of John with the intention of using this individual history to explain the larger trend in biblical studies. Sonya Cronin examines the published work of Raymond Brown, a prominent Catholic New Testament scholar, between the years 1960-1998. The book contextualizes Brown's work by evaluating the impact of ecclesiastical statements and the influence of earlier and contemporary Johannine scholarship on Brown's biblical interpretation, and then posits theories as to why change occurs at specific times
New Testament scholars --- Bible scholars (New Testament) --- Biblical scholars (New Testament) --- Scholars, New Testament --- Biblical scholars --- Brown, Raymond, --- Bible. --- Jean (Book of the New Testament) --- Johanisi (Book of the New Testament) --- Johannesevangelium --- John (Book of the New Testament) --- Yohan pogŭm --- Yohane den (Book of the New Testament) --- Yūḥannā (Book of the New Testament) --- Criticism, interpretation, etc. --- Bible --- Judaism. --- Apologetics. --- Apologetics --- Apologetics, Missionary --- Christian evidences --- Christianity --- Evidences, Christian --- Evidences of Christianity --- Fundamental theology --- Polemics (Theology) --- Theology, Fundamental --- Religious thought --- Theology --- Jews --- Religions --- Semites --- Evidences --- Religion
Choose an application
The treatise “De Graecarum affectionum curatione” (Therapeia of the Greek Maladies) is considered a highlight of Christian apologetic literature. Bishop Theodoret of Cyrrhus(ca AD 393 - ca AD 460) disputes the prejudice that the Christian faith was incompatible with classical education and civilization. He shows the integrating ability of globally aligned Christianity to establish peaceful local communities. The Greek tradition itself demonstrates the truth of Christianity. The text is placed in the context of Theodoret’s life and works. Its literary character, place in Christian apologetics, sources, cultural and historical context, and the possibility that Syrian Antioch was its place of origin are all examined. The present edition contains the critical text by Raeder and a German translation with notes. Die Schrift „De Graecarum affectionum curatione“ (Heilung der griechischen Krankheiten) ist ein Höhe¬punkt der Apologetik der Alten Kirche. Theodoret (circa 393 – circa 460), Bischof von Kyrrhos, tritt dem Vorurteil entgegen, Glaube und Lebensführung der Christen vertrügen sich nicht mit klassischer Bildung und Gesittung. Er wirbt für die integrative Fähigkeit des global ausgerichteten Christentums, friedliche lokale Ge¬meinschaften eta¬blieren zu können. Die griechische Tradition selbst bezeuge die Wahrheit des Christentums. Die Schrift wird in Leben und Werk Theodorets eingeordnet, ihre literarische Eigenart, ihr Platz in der christlichen Apologetik, ihre Quellen, ihr soziales und historisches Umfeld und Antiochien als möglicher Entstehungsort werden untersucht. Die vorliegende Ausgabe enthält den kritischen Text von Raeder und eine deutsche Übersetzung mit kommentierenden Anmerkungen.
Apologetics --- Philosophy, Ancient --- Theodoret, --- 276 =75 THEODORETUS CYRENSIS --- Griekse patrologie--THEODORETUS CYRENSIS --- Theodoretus, --- Cyrrhus, --- Theodōrētos, --- Thiyūdūrītūs, --- Ḟeodorit, --- Théodoret, --- Teodoreto, --- Tʻeodoretos Kiwratsʻi --- Theodoretus van Cyrus --- Théodoret de Cyr --- Theodoret --- Theodoretus Cyrrhensis --- Theodoretus Cyrensis --- Theodorus Cyzicenus --- Apologetics. --- Philosophy, Ancient. --- Ancient philosophy --- Greek philosophy --- Philosophy, Greek --- Philosophy, Roman --- Roman philosophy --- Apologetics, Missionary --- Christian evidences --- Christianity --- Evidences, Christian --- Evidences of Christianity --- Fundamental theology --- Polemics (Theology) --- Theology, Fundamental --- Religious thought --- Theology --- Evidences --- Graecarum affectionum curatio (Theodoret, Bishop of Cyrrhus) --- Hellēnikōn pathēmatōn therapeutikē (Theodoret, Bishop of Cyrrhus) --- Apologetics - Early works to 1800 --- Philosophy, Ancient - Early works to 1800 --- Theodoret, - Bishop of Cyrrhus --- Theodoret, - Bishop of Cyrrhus. - Graecarum affectionum curatio
Listing 1 - 7 of 7 |
Sort by
|