Listing 1 - 2 of 2 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
In The Deuteronomist’s History , Hans Ausloos provides for the first time a detailed status quaestionis concerning the relationship between the books Genesis–Numbers and the so-called Deuteronom(ist)ic literature. After a presentation of the origins of the 18th and 19th century hypothesis of a Deuteronom(ist)ic redaction, specific attention is paid to the argumentation used during the last century. Particular interest also is paid to the concept of the proto-Deuteronomist and the mostly tentative approaches of the Deuteronom(ist)ic ‘redaction’ of the Pentateuch during the last decades. The book concludes with a critical review and preview of the Deuteronom(ist)ic problem. Each phase in the Deuteronomist’s history is illustrated on the basis of the epilogue of the Book of the Covenant (Exod. 23:20-33).
Deuteronomistic history (Biblical criticism) --- Bible. --- Criticism, interpretation, etc. --- 222.2 --- 222.3 --- 222.4 --- Deuteronomic history (Biblical criticism) --- Deuteronomists (Biblical criticism) --- DH (Biblical criticism) --- D document (Biblical criticism) --- Genesis --- Exodus. Leviticus. Numeri --- Deuteronomium --- Chumash --- Five Books of Moses --- Ḥamishah ḥumshe Torah --- Ḥumash --- Kitāb-i Muqqadas --- Mose Ogyŏng (Book of the Old Testament) --- Pentateuch --- Pi︠a︡toknizhīe Moiseevo --- Sefer Ḥamishah ḥumshe Torah --- Tawrāh --- Torà (Pentateuch) --- Torah (Pentateuch) --- Tʻoris xutʻcigneuli --- Ureta --- תורה --- Haftarot --- Bible --- Criticism, interpretation, etc
Choose an application
Much of the scholarship on the book of Kings has focused on questions of the historicity of the events described. Alison L. Joseph turns her attention instead to the literary characterization of Israel's kings. By examining the narrative techniques used in the Deuteronomistic History to portray Israel's kings, Joseph shows that the Deuteronomist in the days of the Josianic Reform constructed David as a model of adherence to the covenant, and Jeroboam, conversely, as the ideal opposite of David. The redactor further characterized other kings along one or the other of these two models. The resulting narrative functions didactically, as if instructing kings and the people of Judah regarding the consequences of disobedience. Attention to characterization through prototype also allows Joseph to identify differences between pre-exilic and exilic redactions in the Deuteronomistic History, bolstering and also revising the view advanced by Frank Moore Cross. The result is a deepened understanding of the worldview and theology of the Deuteronomistic historians.
Deuteronomistic history (Biblical criticism) --- Kings and rulers --- Deuteronomic history (Biblical criticism) --- Deuteronomists (Biblical criticism) --- DH (Biblical criticism) --- D document (Biblical criticism) --- Biblical teaching. --- Bible. --- Kings (Books of the Old Testament) --- Koenige (Books of the Old Testament) --- Könige (Books of the Old Testament) --- Königsbücher (Book of the Old Testament) --- Koningen (Book of the Old Testament) --- Melakhim (Books of the Old Testament) --- Criticism, interpretation, etc. --- 222.6 --- 222.6 Livres de Samuel. Les Rois. David. Salomon. Elia. Elisa. Josias --- 222.6 Samuelboeken. Boeken der koningen. David. Salomon. Elia. Elisa. Josias --- Livres de Samuel. Les Rois. David. Salomon. Elia. Elisa. Josias --- Samuelboeken. Boeken der koningen. David. Salomon. Elia. Elisa. Josias --- Biblical teaching
Listing 1 - 2 of 2 |
Sort by
|