Listing 1 - 7 of 7 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Choose an application
L'éthique de la discussion de Habermas repose sur deux piliers : le principe de discussion (D) et le principe d'universalisation (U). L'analyse du concept d'intérêts universalisables, l'étude de la justification que Habermas donne au principe (U) et la considération du défi du contextualisme sont notamment les trois démarches accomplies dans cet ouvrage, qui permettent d'interroger la possibilité et la nécessité de l'universalisabilité des normes pour qu'elles soient dites morales et d'envisager une éthique de la discussion sans recours au principe d'universalisation (U).
Habermas, Jürgen. Erläuterungen zur Diskursethik --- Habermas, Jürgen --- Ethics
Choose an application
Philosophers --- Sociologists --- Habermas, Jürgen. --- Habermas, Jürgen. --- Biography.
Choose an application
Political philosophy. Social philosophy --- Transnationalism. --- Social structure. --- Political sociology. --- Habermas, Jürgen.
Choose an application
The role of religious self-understandings as resources for the normative foundations of democracy is much debated in social and political ethics, theology and law. The comparison of the positions of Rawls, Habermas and Ricoeur highlights alternative conceptions of the premises of "public reason" and of religion. Recent philosophical and theological receptions and critiques in English and German are brought into conversation.
General ethics --- Religious studies --- Habermas, Jürgen --- Rawls, John --- Ricoeur, Paul --- Ricœur, Paul
Choose an application
How does biotechnology touch on human destiny? What are its promises and challenges? In search of a response, the present volume turns to the thought of Hans Jonas, one of the pioneers and founding fathers of bioethics. The continued relevance of his ideas is exemplified by the way Jürgen Habermas applies them to the current debate. The chief promise of biotechnology is to increase our freedom by overcoming the limits of the human condition. The main risk of biotechnology, as both Jonas and Habermas see it, is to diminish or outright abolish our capacity for responsibility and morality. It is argued that the greater freedom is not simply freedom from constraints but freedom for our destiny: the freedom to be the benevolent, responsible, and spontaneous authors of our lives, capable of communion and love. The touchstone for evaluating any biotechnological procedure has to be this greater freedom. Stephan Kampowski is Associate Professor of Philosophical Anthropology at the Pontifical John Paul II Institute for Studies on Marriage and Family in Rome. He is the author of "Arendt, Augustine, and the New Beginning: The Action Theory and Moral Thought of Hannah Arendt in the Light of Her Dissertation on St. Augustine" (2008). " 'A Greater Freedom' is an excellent and timely introduction to the thought of two eminent philosophers and their work on biophilosophy, bioethics, and biotechnology: Hans Jonas and Jürgen Habermas. Stephan Kampowski enters into an astute dialogue enriched by other important interlocutors (Spaemann, Arendt, Kass) and is deeply guided by the theology of love. A most instructive and rewarding reading for those who want to grasp the boon and bane of biotechnology.
Philosophical anthropology --- Biotechnology --- Fate and fatalism --- Liberty --- Habermas, Jürgen, - 1929 --- -Jonas, Hans, - 1903-1993
Choose an application
Political science --- Political sociology --- Social sciences --- Philosophy --- Arendt, Hannah --- Habermas, Jürgen --- Koselleck, Reinhart --- Schmitt, Carl, --- Political and social views. --- Germany --- Intellectual life
Listing 1 - 7 of 7 |
Sort by
|