Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Self-confidence --- Employment interviewing --- Interviewing --- Confiance en soi --- Entrevues d'emploi --- Entretiens --- Psychological aspects --- Aspect psychologique

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Plaintext description.

Trust. --- Communication. --- Communication, Primitive --- Mass communication --- Sociology --- Trust (Psychology) --- Attitude (Psychology) --- Emotions --- Confiance. --- Interpersonale Kommunikation. --- Kommunikation. --- Vertrauen.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

La plupart des juristes ont leur idée sur le sens et l’importance du principe de sécurité juridique et, surtout, leur avis sur le mal qui semble attaquer le droit de toutes parts : l’insécurité juridique. Cet ouvrage a pour ambition de démontrer que les problèmes qui parcourent la jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l’Union européenne relative à ce principe peuvent s’expliquer par la façon dont l’histoire des idées l’a façonné. Le recensement des contradictions, imprécisions et ambiguïtés dont la jurisprudence européenne est entachée permet, dans une première partie, d’illustrer le fossé existant entre le discours limpide de la Cour sur le principe et son application, paradoxalement ambiguë, incertaine et imprévisible. L’analyse historique révèle ensuite que le principe de sécurité juridique est traversé par quatre logiques qui se sont construites au fil du temps, parfois depuis l’antiquité, et qui permettent de mieux comprendre la jurisprudence de la Cour de justice. Les deux premières sont liées au fondement du principe (la certitude pour la logique cartésienne et la confiance pour la logique fiduciaire) et les deux autres concernent ses destinataires (le pouvoir en place pour la logique politique et les sujets de droit pour la logique subjective). Enfin, douze suggestions sont formulées afin d’améliorer l’utilisation du principe de sécurité juridique par les juridictions de l’Union. Elles sont inspirées d’une double proposition : remplacer la logique cartésienne par la logique fiduciaire et mobiliser l’argument de sécurité juridique en priorité en faveur des individus (logique subjective) plutôt qu’en faveur des autorités (logique politique).

Law of civil procedure --- Law --- European Union --- Justice, Administration of --- Justice --- Droit --- Administration --- Court of Justice of the European Communities --- Droit européen --- Sécurité juridique --- Confiance légitime (droit) --- Jurisprudence --- Union européenne. --- Cases --- Jurisprudence. --- Court of Justice of the European Communities. --- Union européenne

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

"Journal of Trust Management encompasses all aspects of computational trust and trust management seen from technical, social, psychological, legal, economical and cultural perspectives."

Computer systems --- Computer security --- Trust --- Systèmes informatiques --- Sécurité informatique --- Confiance --- Reliability --- Periodicals --- Periodicals. --- Fiabilité --- Périodiques --- Computer security. --- Trust. --- Reliability. --- Trust (Psychology) --- Computer privacy --- Computer system security --- Computers --- Electronic digital computers --- Security of computer systems --- ADP systems (Computer systems) --- Computing systems --- Security measures --- Systems, Computer --- Computer Science --- Systems and Data Security --- Software Engineering/Programming and Operating Systems --- Coding and Information Theory --- Data Structures; Cryptology and Information Theory --- Attitude (Psychology) --- Emotions --- Data protection --- Security systems --- Hacking --- Electronic systems --- Cyberinfrastructure --- Cyber security --- Cybersecurity --- Protection of computer systems --- Protection

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Powerful societal leaders - such as politicians and Chief Executives - are frequently met with substantial distrust by the public. But why are people so suspicious of their leaders? One possibility is that 'power corrupts', and therefore people are right in their reservations. Indeed, there are numerous examples of unethical leadership, even at the highest level, as the Watergate and Enron scandals clearly illustrate. Another possibility is that people are unjustifiably paranoid, as underscored by some of the rather far-fetched conspiracy theories that are endorsed by a surprisingly large portion of citizens. Are societal power holders more likely than the average citizen to display unethical behaviour? How do people generally think and feel about politicians? How do paranoia and conspiracy beliefs about societal power holders originate? In this book, prominent scholars address these intriguing questions and illuminate the many facets of the relations between power, politics and paranoia.

PSYCHOLOGY / Social Psychology. --- Business ethics --- Power (Social sciences) --- Social psychology --- Transparency in government --- Trust --- Social psychology. --- Conspiracy theories --- Transparency in government. --- Business ethics. --- Psychologie sociale --- Confiance --- Transparence (Sciences sociales) --- Morale des affaires --- Moral and ethical aspects --- Social aspects --- Moral and ethical aspects. --- Social aspects. --- Aspect social --- Business --- Psychology --- Social Psychology. --- Pouvoir (Sciences sociales) --- Théories du complot --- Théories du complot --- Businesspeople --- Commercial ethics --- Corporate ethics --- Corporation ethics --- Professional ethics --- Wealth --- Government in the sunshine --- Open government (Transparency in government) --- Openness in government --- Sunshine, Government in the --- Transparence in government --- Public administration --- History --- Mass psychology --- Psychology, Social --- Human ecology --- Social groups --- Sociology --- Empowerment (Social sciences) --- Political power --- Exchange theory (Sociology) --- Political science --- Social sciences --- Consensus (Social sciences) --- Errors, inventions, etc. --- Transparency (Ethics) in government.