Listing 1 - 10 of 12 | << page >> |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Judges --- District courts --- Appellate courts --- Selection and appointment --- Federal courts
Choose an application
This multifaceted approach yields a level of insight beyond that provided by any previous work on appellate courts in the United States, making The View from the Bench and Chambers the most comprehensive and rich account of the operation of these courts to date.
Judicial process --- Appellate courts --- Federal courts of appeal
Choose an application
The role of the European judiciary has, in recent years, undergone a significant upheaval that has led to a realignment of judicial, legislative and executive powers. This exciting new book provides an insider's perspective on how these changes have affected the practical aspects of life in the European judiciary. This first book in Elgar's new series on Judicial Cooperation covers areas central to the evolution of the judiciary's role, including the protection of its independence, the working conditions of the judiciaries, as well as their relations with outside partners. With great insight, the contributors to this volume explore the shifting role that courts play as both legal innovators and system stabilizers. In order to carry out these roles effectively the judiciary must strive for cooperation: this book makes a valuable contribution to that aim. Regulating Judicial Activity in Europe will appeal to researchers and graduate students as well as to EU and national officials.
Court administration --- Appellate courts --- Judicial independence --- Justice, Administration of
Choose an application
Judges --- Appellate courts --- District courts --- Selection and appointment --- Workload
Choose an application
Im Oktober 1863 hat - noch vor der Gründung des Deutschen Reichs - mit dem Badischen Verwaltungsgerichtshof in Karlsruhe das erste Verwaltungsgericht in Deutschland seine Arbeit aufgenommen, alsbald gefolgt von den anderen deutschen Ländern. Dies gibt Anlass, sich mit der Geschichte der Verwaltungsgerichtsbarkeit in Deutschland während der letzten 150 Jahre zu befassen, beginnend mit ihrer damaligen Struktur und Zuständigkeit, mit Beispielen früher Rechtsprechung des PreußOVG, der Zeit des Nationalsozialismus bis zur Struktur der Verwaltungsgerichtsbarkeit in der Bundesrepublik. Die Rechtsprechung als Spiegel der Zeitgeschichte wird ebenso dargestellt wie die Herausforderungen nach der Wiedervereinigung und Fragestellungen der neueren Zeit, etwa die nach der Schaffung eines einheitlichen Fachgerichts. Der Beitrag basiert auf einem Vortrag, den der ehemalige Präsident des Bundesverwaltungsgerichts aus Anlass des Jubiläums im Oberverwaltungsgericht Berlin - Brandenburg, dem ursprünglichen Gebäude des PreußOVG gehalten hat.
Appellate courts --- Courts of appeals --- Supreme courts --- Courts --- Appellate procedure --- Courts of last resort --- Administrative justice.
Choose an application
Judges --- Appellate courts --- District courts --- Justice, Administration of --- Workload --- Selection and appointment --- Officials and employees
Choose an application
Until recently, American legal historiography focused almost solely on national government. Although much of Kansas law reflects U.S. law, the state court's arbitrary powers over labor-management conflicts, yellow dog contracts, civil rights, gender issues, and domestic relations set precedents that reverberated around the country. Sunflower Justice is a pioneering work that presents the history of a state through the use of its supreme court decisions as evidence. R. Alton Lee traces Kansas's legal history through 150 years of records, shedding light on the state'
Courts of last resort --- Courts, Supreme --- Last resort, Courts of --- Supreme courts --- Appellate procedure --- Courts --- Appellate courts --- Constitutional courts --- History. --- Kansas.
Choose an application
Imperial Justice explores the imperial control of judicial governance and the adjudication of colonial difference in British Africa. Focusing on the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council and the colonial regional Appeal Courts for West Africa and East Africa, it examines how judicial discourses of native difference and imperial universalism in local disputes influenced practices of power in colonial settings and shaped an evolving jurisprudence of Empire. Arguing that the Imperial Appeal Courts were key sites where colonial legal modernity was fashioned, the book examines the tensions that p
Appellate courts --- History. --- Great Britain. --- West African Court of Appeal --- Courts of appeals --- Supreme courts --- Courts --- Appellate procedure --- Courts of last resort --- East African Court of Appeal --- H.M. Court of Appeal for Eastern Africa --- Court of Appeal for Eastern Africa --- Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (Great Britain) --- Court of Appeals from the Plantations (Great Britain) --- JCPC --- Caribbean Court of Justice
Choose an application
State supreme courts use state constitutional provisions to afford their citizens state constitutional rights beyond the protections that the U.S. Supreme Court has interpreted the U.S. Constitution to require. As state supreme courts consider expanding state constitutional rights they engage in an ongoing dialogue with their sister state supreme courts. Results indicate this dialogue amongst state supreme courts influences decisions interpreting state constitutional rights. Denniston demonstrates through analysis of state supreme court decisions and interviews with state supreme court justice
Constitutional law --- Courts of last resort --- Judicial process --- Decision making, Judicial --- Judicial behavior --- Judicial decision making --- Judges --- Law --- Procedure (Law) --- Courts, Supreme --- Last resort, Courts of --- Supreme courts --- Appellate procedure --- Courts --- Appellate courts --- Constitutional courts --- Constitutional limitations --- Constitutionalism --- Constitutions --- Limitations, Constitutional --- Public law --- Administrative law --- States --- States. --- Psychological aspects --- Interpretation and construction
Choose an application
The US Supreme Court seeks to withhold information about its deliberations, while the press's job is to report and disseminate this information. These two objectives conflict and create tension between the justices and the reporters who cover them; add to that the increasing demands for transparency in the digital age and the result is an interesting dynamic between an institution that seeks to preserve its opaqueness and a press corps that demands greater transparency. This volume examines the relationship between justices and the press through chapters that discuss facets such as coverage of the institution, the media's approach to the docket, and the effects of news coverage on public opinion. Additionally, two journalists who cover the court offer insights into the profession of reporting today, while two biographers of Supreme Court justices share the perspectives of those justices regarding the press.
Courts of last resort --- Mass media --- Courts, Supreme --- Last resort, Courts of --- Supreme courts --- Appellate procedure --- Courts --- Appellate courts --- Constitutional courts --- Press coverage --- Law and legislation --- United States. --- Supreme Court (U.S.) --- Chief Justice of the United States --- Supreme Court of the United States --- 美國. --- Press coverage.
Listing 1 - 10 of 12 | << page >> |
Sort by
|