Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

This paper distinguishes among various types of capital and examines their effect on system-wide fragility. The analysis finds that higher quality forms of capital reduce the systemic risk contribution of banks, whereas lower quality forms can have a destabilizing impact, particularly during crisis periods. The impact of capital on systemic risk is less pronounced for smaller banks, for banks located in countries with more generous safety nets, and in countries with institutions that allow for better public and private monitoring of financial institutions. The results show that regulatory capital is effective in reducing systemic risk and that regulatory risk weights are correlated with higher future asset volatility, but this relationship is significantly weaker for larger banks. The paper also finds that increased regulatory risk-weights not correlated with future asset volatility increase systemic fragility. Overall, the results are consistent with the theoretical literature that emphasizes capital as a potential buffer in absorbing liquidity, information, and economic shocks reducing contagious defaults.

Access to Finance --- Bank Capital --- Banking Law --- Banks and Banking Reform --- Basel Capital --- Debt Markets --- Default --- Distance to Default --- Finance and Financial Sector Development --- Financial Intermediation --- Law and Development --- Merton Model --- Systemic Risk

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

This paper finds that shareholder-friendly corporate governance is positively associated with bank insolvency risk, as proxied by the Z-score and the Merton's distance to default measure, for an international sample of banks over the 2004-08 period. Banks are special in that "good" corporate governance increases bank insolvency risk relatively more for banks that are large and located in countries with sound public finances, as banks aim to exploit the financial safety net. Good corporate governance is specifically associated with higher asset volatility, more nonperforming loans, and a lower tangible capital ratio. Furthermore, good corporate governance is associated with more bank risk-taking at times of rapid economic expansion. Consistent with increased risk-taking, good corporate governance is associated with a higher valuation of the implicit insurance provided by the financial safety net, especially in the case of large banks. These results underline the importance of the financial safety net and too-big-to-fail policies in encouraging excessive risk-taking by banks.

Bank Insolvency --- Bankruptcy and Resolution of Financial Distress --- Banks and Banking Reform --- Capitalization --- Corporate Governance --- Debt Markets --- Emerging Markets --- Finance and Financial Sector Development --- Governance --- Governance Indicators --- Non-Performing Loans --- Public Sector Development