Listing 1 - 10 of 14 | << page >> |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Security, International --- Collective security --- International security --- International relations --- Disarmament --- International organization --- Peace --- North Atlantic Treaty Organization. --- North Atlantic treaty organisation --- North Atlantic Treaty Organization --- NAVO --- OTAN
Choose an application
Ces contributions analysent de façon comparative et multidisciplinaire, l'interface entre les médias, d'une part, et les organisations nationales, européennes et atlantiques d'autre part, dans le domaine de la sécurité et de la défense. L'objectif est de rendre compte des relations entre décideurs, médias et opinion politique nationale en Belgique et dans les pays frontaliers.
Military policy --- Politique militaire --- North Atlantic Treaty Organization --- Regionalism --- Social integration --- Africa --- Economic integration --- Social aspects --- Médias et politique --- Forces armées et médias --- Politique de sécurité et de défense commune --- Pays de l'OTAN --- Politique de sécurité et de défense communePays de l'OTAN --- Civil military relations --- Communication --- Political aspects --- Common Security and Defence Policy --- European Union countries --- Democracy --- Europe --- Nationalism --- Mass media --- Comparative studies --- In mass media --- North Atlantic Treaty Organization. --- Médias et politique. --- Forces armées et médias. --- Politique de sécurité et de défense commune. --- Pays de l'OTAN. --- Civil military relations - European Union countries --- Communication - Political aspects - European Union countries --- European Union countries - Military policy
Choose an application
En raison de son engagement dans l'Alliance atlantique, la Quatrième République a souvent été présentée comme un régime faible, soumis à l'influence américaine, contrastant en cela avec la France du général de Gaulle, ferme et en rupture avec l'OTAN. D'où la nécessité d'une approche plus "compréhensive", moins destinée à "juger" les hommes du passé à l'aulne de ce qui est ensuite advenu, qu'à essayer de saisir la manière dont ils percevaient le monde et le sens qu'ils donnaient à leurs actions. Cela conduit à définir l'"atlantisme" français comme un atlantisme de raison et à réinterpréter un passé presque honteux, renvoyant à un temps où la France comptait sur l'OTAN et où l'OTAN était installée en France. Le processus de décision permet de voir qu'au-delà des querelles, des rivalités et des changements de personnels, la politique atlantique française est menée par des experts et des hauts fonctionnaires. Leur quête d'influence, dans un contexte où tout semble conduire la France à la dépendance, ne fut peut-être pas l'échec que l'on imagine trop souvent.
Guerre froide --- Relations internationales --- Organisation du traité de l'Atlantique nord --- France --- Pays de l'OTAN --- Relations extérieures --- Politique et gouvernement --- NATO--FRANCE --- FRANCE--FOREIGN RELATIONS --- Guerre froide. --- Relations extérieures --- Organisation du traité de l'Atlantique nord
Choose an application
NATO has been a successful forum for managing European security policy. Yet European governments have repeatedly tried to build a new security institution in NATO's shadow. In this innovative book, Stephanie C. Hofmann asks why governments attempted to create an additional institution despite no obvious functional necessity and why some attempts failed while others succeeded. European Security in NATO's Shadow considers security cooperation through the lens of party ideologies to shed new light on these questions. She observes that political parties are motivated to propose new institutions by their multidimensional ideologies. Moreover, the success of efforts to create such institutions depends on the degree of ideological congruence among parties in power. In particular, the relationship between the values of multilateralism, sovereignty and Europe informed the impetus and success rate of the attempts made during negotiations for the Maastricht, Amsterdam and Nice treaties to create a European security institution.
National security --- North Atlantic Treaty Organization --- Europe --- Politics and government --- Political science --- International Relations --- General. --- North Atlantic Treaty Organization. --- Political scienceInternational Relations --- General.North Atlantic Treaty Organization.EuropePolitics and government --- North Atlantic treaty organisation --- NAVO --- OTAN --- National security - Europe --- Europe - Politics and government - 1945 --- -National security --- Social Sciences --- Political Science
Choose an application
Documents how energy resource acquisition has been the driving motivator for European and American international relations.
Cities and towns -- Growth. --- Geopolitics -- United States. --- North Atlantic Treaty Organization. --- Power resources -- Europe. --- Power resources -- United States. --- United States -- Foreign relations. --- Power resources --- Cities and towns --- Geopolitics --- Business & Economics --- Industries --- Growth --- Growth. --- United States --- Foreign relations. --- Growth, Urban --- Sprawl, Urban --- Urban development --- Urban growth --- Urban sprawl --- North Atlantic treaty organisation --- North Atlantic Treaty Organization --- Migration, Internal --- Population --- Vital statistics --- NAVO --- OTAN --- E-books
Choose an application
When the Tunisian and Egyptian uprisings erupted in Africa, in the first two months of the year 2011, with the chant, 'the people want to bring down the regime', there was hope all over the continent that these rebellions were part of a wider African Awakening. President Ben Ali of Tunisia was forced to step down and fled to Saudi Arabia. Within a month of Ben Ali's departure, Hosni Mubarak of Egypt was removed from power by the people, who mobilised a massive revolutionary movement in the country. Four days after the ousting of Mubarak, sections of the Libyan people rebelled in Benghazi. Within days, this uprising was militarised, with armed resistance countered by declarations from the Libyan leadership vowing to use raw state power to root out the rebellion. The first Libyan demonstrations occurred on February 15, 2011, but by February 21 there were reports that innocent civilians were in imminent danger of being massacred by the army. This information was embellished by reports of the political leadership branding the rebellious forces as 'rats'. The United States (US), Britain and France took the lead to rush through a resolution in the United Nations (UN) Security Council, invoking the principle of the 'responsibility to protect'. This concept of responsibility to protect had been embraced and supported by many governments in the aftermath of the genocidal episodes in Rwanda, Bosnia and Kosovo. The UN Security Council Resolution 1973 of 2011 was loosely worded, with the formulation 'all necessary measures' tacked on to ensure wide latitude for those societies and political leaders who orchestrated the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) intervention in Libya. In the following nine months, the implementation of this UN resolution exposed the real objectives of the leaders of the US, France and Britain. With the Western media fuelling a propaganda campaign in the traditions of 'manufacturing consent', this Security Council authorisation was stretched from a clear and limited civilian protection mandate into a military campaign for regime change and the execution of the President of Libya, Muammar Gaddafi.
Intervention (International law) --- Regime change --- Change, Regime --- Political violence --- Interim governments --- Legitimacy of governments --- Military intervention --- Diplomacy --- International law --- Neutrality --- North Atlantic Treaty Organization --- NAVO --- OTAN --- North Atlantic treaty organisation --- Armed Forces --- Libya --- Politics and government --- History --- Revolutions --- Insurrections --- Rebellions --- Revolts --- Revolutionary wars --- Political science --- War --- Government, Resistance to --- Peacekeeping forces --- Peacekeeping (Military science) --- Peacekeeping operations --- International police --- Peace-building
Choose an application
Following the 9/11 attacks, a war against al Qaeda by the U.S. and its liberal democratic allies was next to inevitable. But what kind of war would it be, how would it be fought, for how long, and what would it cost in lives and money? None of this was known at the time. What came to be known was that the old ways of war must change—but how? Now, with over a decade of political decision-making and warfighting to analyze, How 9/11 Changed Our Ways of War addresses that question. In particular it assesses how well those ways of war, adapted to fight terrorism, affect our military capacity to protect and sustain liberal democratic values. The book pursues three themes: what shaped the strategic choice to go to war; what force was used to wage the war; and what resources were needed to carry on the fight? In each case, military effectiveness required new and strict limits on the justification, use, and support of force. How to identify and observe these limits is a matter debated by the various contributors. Their debate raises questions about waging future wars—including how to defend against and control the use of drones, cyber warfare, and targeted assassinations. The contributors include historians, political scientists, and sociologists; both academics and practitioners.
Military art and science --- Military art and science. --- September 11 Terrorist Attacks, 2001 --- Fighting --- Military power --- Military science --- Warfare --- Warfare, Primitive --- Naval art and science --- War --- Influence. --- North Atlantic Treaty Organization. --- NAVO --- OTAN --- North Atlantic treaty organisation --- North Atlantic Treaty Organization --- United States --- Military policy.
Choose an application
In the late 1990s NATO dropped bombs and supported armed insurgencies in Yugoslavia while insisting that its motives were purely humanitarian and that its only goal was peace. However, George Szamuely argues that NATO interventions actually prolonged conflicts, heightened enmity, increased casualties, and fueled demands for more interventions. Eschewing the one-sided approach adopted by previous works on the Yugoslavian crisis, Szamuely offers a broad overview of the conflict, its role in the rise of NATO's authority, and its influence on Western policy on the Balkans. His timely, judicious, and accessible study sheds new light on the roots of the contemporary doctrine of humanitarian intervention.
Yugoslav War, 1991-1995. --- War in former Yugoslavia, 1991-1995 --- Yugoslav Conflict, 1991-1995 --- Yugoslav Wars of Secession, 1991-1995 --- Yugoslav War Crime Trials, Hague, Netherlands, 1994 --- -Yugoslavia --- History --- Humanitarian intervention --- -Intervention (International law) --- North Atlantic Treaty Organization --- North Atlantic treaty organisation --- NAVO --- OTAN --- Yugoslavia --- -North Atlantic Treaty Organization --- Humanitaire interventie. --- R2P. --- Srebenica. --- Voormalig Joegoslavië. --- etnisch conflict.
Choose an application
Die nationalen und bündnisinternen Entscheidungsprozesse auf dem Weg zum Atlantischen Bündnis vor dem Hintergrund beunruhigend empfundener Bedrohungsvorstellungen geben in multinationaler Perspektive auf teils neu erschlossener Quellengrundlage umfassend Einblick in die höchst unterschiedlichen Interessen und Motive, aus denen sich die internationalen und nationalen Akteure auf eine solidarische Allianz einließen. Die bündnispolitische Konsensfindung forderte von ihnen außergewöhnliche Modalitäten und Verfahrensweisen, die Berücksichtigung wirtschafts- und finanzpolitischer Gegebenheiten, Beachtung verteidigungspolitischer und militärstrategischer Bedingungen, hohes Einfühlungsvermögen in mentalitätsgeschichtliche Denkmuster, die Überwindung ideologischer Vorbehalte sowie ein Gespür für innen-, partei- und gesellschaftspolitisch notwendige Rücksichten. So wird verständlich, warum unter dem vorrangigen Vorbehalt weitgehender Bewahrung nationaler Souveränität Kosten und Nutzen sowie Chancen und Risiken wachsam abzuwägen waren, um eine tragfähige transatlantische Friedensordnung zu gestalten, die kosteneffiziente kollektive Sicherheit versprach. Als die Nordatlantische Allianz aus der Taufe gehoben wurde, trug sie diesem Spannungsverhältnis zwischen nationalem Selbsterhalt und Bündnissolidarität durch eine anpassungs- und wandlungsfähige Vertragsgestaltung erfolgreich Rechnung. Darin liegt eines der Geheimnisse, welche die lange Lebensdauer der NATO schon aus ihren Anfängen heraus verständlich machen.
National security --- National security policy --- NSP (National security policy) --- Security policy, National --- Economic policy --- International relations --- Military policy --- History --- Government policy --- North Atlantic Treaty Organization --- North Atlantic treaty organisation --- NAVO --- OTAN --- History. --- Europe, Western --- Europe --- West Europe --- Western Europe --- Defenses --- Politics and government
Choose an application
When NATO took charge of the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) for Afghanistan in 2003, ISAF conceptualized its mission largely as a stabilization and reconstruction deployment. However, as the campaign has evolved and the insurgency has proved to more resistant and capable, key operational imperatives have emerged, including military support to the civilian development effort, closer partnering with Afghan security forces, and greater military restraint. All participating militaries have adapted, to varying extents, to these campaign imperatives and pressures. This book analyzes these initiatives and their outcomes by focusing on the experiences of three groups of militaries: those of Britain, Canada, Denmark, the Netherlands, and the US, which have faced the most intense operational and strategic pressures; Germany, who's troops have faced the greatest political and cultural constraints; and the Afghan National Army (ANA) and the Taliban, who have been forced to adapt to a very different sets of circumstances.
Afghan War, 2001 --- -Operational art (Military science) --- Tactics --- Military policy --- Defense policy --- Military readiness --- Military history --- Sociology, Military --- War --- National security --- Military tactics --- Military art and science --- Operational level of war --- Strategy --- Operation Enduring Freedom, 2001 --- -War on Terrorism, 2001-2009 --- Political aspects --- North Atlantic Treaty Organization --- North Atlantic treaty organisation --- NAVO --- OTAN --- Armed Forces --- -Operation Enduring Freedom, 2001 --- Afghan War, 2001-2021. --- Operational art (Military science) --- Afghanistankrigen 2001-2020 --- Krigskunst --- Taktik
Listing 1 - 10 of 14 | << page >> |
Sort by
|