Listing 1 - 3 of 3 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Choose an application
These appendixes explain the methodology used in an analysis of the costs and savings of joint aircraft acquisition programs. They illustrate calculations for theoretical maximum savings in acquisition and in operations and support, historical joint aircraft cost-growth premiums, savings needed to offset premiums, and two cost-comparison methodologies.
F-35 (Military aircraft) --- Fighter planes --- Life cycle costing --- Military & Naval Science --- Law, Politics & Government --- Air Forces --- Costs --- Costing, Life cycle --- L.C.C. (Life cycle costing) --- LCC (Life cycle costing) --- Life cycle cost --- Life cycle cost analysis --- Terotechnology --- Fighter-bombers --- Fighters (Airplanes) --- Pursuit planes --- F-35 (Jet fighter plane) --- Joint Strike Fighter (Military aircraft) --- Lightning II (Military aircraft) --- Lockheed Martin Lightning II (Military aircraft) --- Lockheed Martin Joint Strike Fighter (Military aircraft) --- X-35 (Jet fighter plane) --- Costs, Industrial --- Airplanes, Military --- Lockheed Martin aircraft --- United States. --- Procurement --- Costs. --- D.O.D. --- DOD (Department of Defense) --- Mei-kuo kuo fang pu --- Ministerstvo oborony SShA --- Министерство обороны США --- National Military Establishment (U.S.)
Choose an application
In the past 50 years, the U.S. Department of Defense has pursued numerous joint aircraft programs, the largest and most recent of which is the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF). Joint aircraft programs are thought to reduce Life Cycle Cost (LCC) by eliminating duplicate research, development, test, and evaluation efforts and by realizing economies of scale in procurement, operations, and support. But the need to accommodate different service requirements in a single design or common design family can lead to greater program complexity, increased technical risk, and common functionality or increased weight in excess of that needed for some variants, potentially leading to higher overall cost, despite these efficiencies. To help Air Force leaders (and acquisition decisionmakers in general) select an appropriate acquisition strategy for future combat aircraft, this report analyzes the costs and savings of joint aircraft acquisition programs. The project team examined whether historical joint aircraft programs have saved LCC compared with single-service programs. In addition, the project team assessed whether JSF is on track to achieving the joint savings originally anticipated at the beginning of full-scale development. Also examined were the implications of joint fighter programs for the health of the industrial base and for operational and strategic risk.
F-35 (Military aircraft) --- Fighter planes --- Life cycle costing --- Air Forces --- Military & Naval Science --- Law, Politics & Government --- Costs --- Costing, Life cycle --- L.C.C. (Life cycle costing) --- LCC (Life cycle costing) --- Life cycle cost --- Life cycle cost analysis --- Terotechnology --- F-35 (Jet fighter plane) --- Joint Strike Fighter (Military aircraft) --- Lightning II (Military aircraft) --- Lockheed Martin Lightning II (Military aircraft) --- Lockheed Martin Joint Strike Fighter (Military aircraft) --- X-35 (Jet fighter plane) --- Fighter-bombers --- Fighters (Airplanes) --- Pursuit planes --- Costs, Industrial --- Airplanes, Military --- Lockheed Martin aircraft --- United States. --- Procurement --- Costs. --- D.O.D. --- DOD (Department of Defense) --- Mei-kuo kuo fang pu --- Ministerstvo oborony SShA --- Министерство обороны США --- National Military Establishment (U.S.)
Listing 1 - 3 of 3 |
Sort by
|