Listing 1 - 5 of 5 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
This report analyzes equity and financial protection in the health sector of Zambia. In particular, it examines inequalities in health outcomes, health behavior and health care utilization; benefit incidence analysis; financial protection; and the progressivity of health care financing. Data are drawn from the 2007 Zambia demographic and health survey, the 2006 Zambia living conditions monitoring survey, the 2003 Zambia world health survey and the 2003 Zambia national health accounts. All analyses are conducted using original survey data and employ the health modules of the ADePT software. Overall, health care financing in Zambia in 2006 was fairly progressive, id est the better-off spent a larger fraction of their consumption on health care than the poor. The financing sources that contribute to the overall progressivity of health care finance are general taxation, which finances 42 per cent of domestic spending on health, and contributions made by private employers, which finance 9 per cent of spending. An additional contribution to overall progressivity is made through pre-payment mechanisms, but this remains fairly limited given that they only represent 1 per cent of total health finance. Out-of-pocket health payments, which account for 47 per cent of total health financing, appear to be proportional to income, with only slight and not statistically significant evidence of progressivity.
Breast Cancer --- Cervical Cancer --- Child Health --- Cost-Effectiveness --- Diabetes --- Diarrhea --- Disease Control & Prevention --- Doctors --- Employment --- Gender --- Health Economics & Finance --- Health Finance --- Health Insurance --- Health Monitoring & Evaluation --- Health Outcomes --- Health Systems Development & Reform --- Health, Nutrition and Population --- Hiv/Aids --- Hospitals --- Human Resources --- Infant Mortality --- International Comparisons --- Living Standards --- Malaria --- Measles --- Mortality --- Nutrition --- Obesity --- Physicians --- Polio --- Poverty Reduction --- Private Health Insurance --- Private Sector --- Public Health --- Public Hospitals --- Public Sector --- Social Health Insurance --- Social Insurance --- Specialists --- Tuberculosis --- Violence --- Workers
Choose an application
This report analyzes equity and financial protection in the health sector of Vietnam. In particular, it examines inequalities in health outcomes, health behavior and health care utilization; benefit incidence analysis; financial protection; and the progressivity of health care financing. Data are drawn from the 1992-93 and 1997-98 Vietnam living standards survey, the 2002, 2004, 2006, and 2008 Vietnam household and living standards survey, the 2002 Vietnam demographic and health survey, the 2002 Vietnam world health survey, the 2006 Vietnam multiple indicator cluster survey and the 2006 Vietnam national health accounts. All analyses are conducted using original survey data and employ the health modules of the ADePT software. Overall, health care financing in Vietnam in 2006 was fairly progressive, id est the better-off spent a larger fraction of their consumption on health care than the poor. The financing sources that contribute to the overall progressivity of health care finance are general taxation, which finances 27 per cent of domestic spending on health, and out-of-pocket payments, which finance 55 per cent of spending. The most progressive source of health finance is actually Social Health Insurance (SHI) contributions, which is unsurprising given that they are paid largely by formal sector workers who are among the better-off; however, SHI contributions finance just 13 per cent of health spending. Voluntary insurance is mildly regressive, but this finances an even smaller share of total health spending.
Breast Cancer --- Burden of Disease --- Cervical Cancer --- Child Health --- Diabetes --- Diarrhea --- Disease Control & Prevention --- Drugs --- Employment --- Gender --- Health Economics & Finance --- Health Finance --- Health Insurance --- Health Monitoring & Evaluation --- Health Outcomes --- Health Systems Development & Reform --- Health, Nutrition and Population --- Hospitals --- Infant Mortality --- International Comparisons --- Living Standards --- Low-Income Countries --- Malaria --- Measles --- Mortality --- Nutrition --- Obesity --- Physicians --- Polio --- Population Policies --- Poverty Reduction --- Private Sector --- Public Health --- Public Sector --- Social Health Insurance --- Social Insurance --- Traditional Medicine --- Tuberculosis --- Violence --- Workers
Choose an application
The health equity and financial protection reports are short country-specific volumes that provide a picture of equity and financial protection in the health sectors of low- and middle-income countries. Topics covered include: inequalities in health outcomes, health behavior and health care utilization; benefit incidence analysis; financial protection; and the progressivity of health care financing. This report analyses equity and financial protection in the health sector of Mongolia. In particular, it examines inequalities in health outcomes and health care utilization; benefit incidence analysis; financial protection; and the progressivity of health care financing. Data are drawn from the 2005 Mongolia multiple indicator cluster survey and the 2007-08 Mongolia household socio-economic survey.
Breast Cancer --- Cervical Cancer --- Child Health --- Diabetes --- Diarrhea --- Disasters --- Doctors --- Gender --- Health Economics & Finance --- Health Finance --- Health Insurance --- Health Outcomes --- Health Systems Development & Reform --- Health, Nutrition and Population --- Hospitals --- Infant Mortality --- Living Standards --- Malaria --- Measles --- Mortality --- Nurses --- Nutrition --- Obesity --- Polio --- Population Policies --- Poverty Reduction --- Private Health Insurance --- Private Sector --- Public Health --- Public Hospitals --- Public Sector --- Quality of Health Care --- Social Health Insurance --- Social Insurance --- Tuberculosis --- Violence
Choose an application
The health equity and financial protection reports are short country-specific volumes that provide a picture of equity and financial protection in the health sectors of low-and middle-income countries. Topics covered include: inequalities in health outcomes, health behavior and health care utilization; benefit incidence analysis; financial protection; and the progressivity of health care financing. Ghana's government is committed to improving equity and financial protection in the health sector. In 2005, the Government of Ghana amended its growth and poverty reduction strategy report to include a new target in the country's development: to reach middle income status by the year 2015 (Republic of Ghana 2005). Ghana's Minister of health has called attention to the role that health plays in economic development and has placed equity in both access and delivery of health services as a top priority for reaching middle income status (Ministry of health 2007). Ghana spends 8.1 per cent (2009) of its gross domestic product (GDP) on health. This is greater than the spending levels in other lower middle-income countries in Africa, which spend an average of 5.8 per cent (2009) of their GDP on health. Ghana provides free health services for certain vulnerable groups, such as children under five, people over 70, and pregnant women. In addition, immunization and services to combat certain communicable diseases are provided free of charge.
Breast Cancer --- Burden of Disease --- Cervical Cancer --- Child Health --- Cities --- Communicable Diseases --- Diabetes --- Diarrhea --- Disease Control & Prevention --- Doctors --- Family Planning --- Gender --- Health Economics & Finance --- Health Finance --- Health Monitoring & Evaluation --- Health Outcomes --- Health Systems Development & Reform --- Health, Nutrition and Population --- Hospitals --- Human Resources --- Human Rights --- Income Distribution --- Infant Mortality --- Informal Sector --- International Comparisons --- Living Standards --- Low-Income Countries --- Malaria --- Measles --- Migration --- Mortality --- Nurses --- Nutrition --- Obesity --- Physicians --- Polio --- Population Policies --- Poverty Reduction --- Private Health Insurance --- Public Health --- Public Health Personnel --- Public Hospitals --- Public Spending --- Social Health Insurance --- Social Insurance --- Tuberculosis --- Violence --- Workers
Choose an application
This volume of the International Perspectives on Education and Society series comparatively examines various two-year and community college institutions worldwide. While these institutions are called by different names and may not all be structured the same around the world, their core mission remains consistently: to respond to the needs of their local community. Inspired by the German Volkshochschule, founded in 1844, this model is now throughout the U.S., Canada, Australia, India, South Africa, Thailand and other nations. While the community college is debatable and possibly controversial in and of itself, these institutions all serve the needs of their local communities by bridging the gap between academic and technical training with open and accessible learning. Students served by these institutions come from various socioeconomic backgrounds including age, race, culture, gender, and income levels. Two-year and community colleges adapt and institutionalize differently to meet various community needs, whether they provide students with technical training, the ability to transfer to four-year higher education institutions, remedial education or lifelong learning opportunities. This volume analyzes the ways this model has served and continues to serve communities in different international contexts for similar purposes.
HIV-positive persons --- Education --- HIV infections --- Education. --- Health aspects. --- Social aspects. --- AIDS (Disease) -- Social aspects. --- Education -- Health aspects -- Cross-cultural studies. --- HIV infections -- Social aspects. --- Social Sciences --- Education, Special Topics --- Community colleges -- United States. --- Community colleges. --- Theory & Practice of Education --- Health & Fitness --- Educational: Personal, social & health education (PSHE) --- Multicultural education. --- HIV-positive persons. --- Diseases --- AIDS & HIV. --- Health Care Issues. --- General. --- Colleges of higher education. --- Adult education, continuous learning. --- Education, Higher. --- Higher. --- Organizations & Institutions. --- Inclusive Education. --- College students --- Higher education --- Postsecondary education --- Universities and colleges --- Community junior colleges --- Local junior colleges --- Municipal junior colleges --- Public community colleges --- Public junior colleges --- Public two-year colleges --- Two-year colleges --- Junior colleges --- Public universities and colleges --- HIV (Viruses) infections --- HTLV-III infections --- HTLV-III-LAV infections --- Human T-lymphotropic virus III infections --- Lentivirus infections --- Sexually transmitted diseases --- Children --- Education, Primitive --- Education of children --- Human resource development --- Instruction --- Pedagogy --- Schooling --- Students --- Youth --- Civilization --- Learning and scholarship --- Mental discipline --- Schools --- Teaching --- Training --- HIV-infected persons --- HIV patients --- HIV-sero-positive persons --- HIV-seropositive persons --- People living with HIV/AIDS --- Positive persons, HIV --- -Sero-positive persons, HIV --- -Seropositive persons, HIV --- -Patients --- Patients --- Public universities and colleges.
Listing 1 - 5 of 5 |
Sort by
|