Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Law of civil procedure --- International private law --- European Union --- Parent and child (Law) --- Judgments, Foreign --- Custody of children --- Divorce --- Domestic relations --- Marriage --- Jugements étrangers --- Garde des enfants (Droit) --- Familles --- Mariage --- Droit --- Council of the European Union. --- Council of the European Union --- Parents et enfants (Droit) --- Jugements étrangers --- Guardian and ward --- Paternity --- Child custody --- Children --- Children, Custody of --- Parental custody --- Divorce mediation --- Absentee fathers --- Absentee mothers --- Parental relocation (Child custody) --- Visitation rights (Domestic relations) --- Custody --- Law and legislation --- Parent and child (Law) - European Union countries --- Custody of children - European Union countries

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Improving the Quality of Child Custody Evaluations A Systematic Model Lauren Woodward Tolle, Ph.D. and William O’Donohue, Ph.D. In the best interests of the child. This phrase has guided child custody evaluators for decades. But how do the professionals tasked with evaluation understand a child’s best interests? Can it be assumed that two evaluators will come to the same decision given the same case? What evidence-based methods are—or should be—involved? Improving the Quality of Child Custody Evaluations raises significant questions of accuracy, reliability, and validity in the way even the best-intentioned evaluations are conducted, and proposes standardized guidelines for correction. Identifying conceptual as well as empirical shortcomings in the evaluation process, the authors analyze the current state of custody evaluation protocols and the welter of laws surrounding the concept of the best interests of the child. An empirically-based framework, the Egregious/Promotive Factors Model, is presented as a reliable alternative, supported by rigorous assessment tools and backed by the results of a pilot study of the model among family court judges. Throughout, the book never loses sight of the optimum end result: a reliable foundation for children’s future well-being. Included in the coverage:  Current controversies in custody arrangements. Current controversies in custody guidelines. Review of the post-divorce child outcome literature. Evolution of the Egregious/Promotive Factors Model (EPFM). Assessing risk and positive factors in parenting. Preliminary support for the EPFM.

Custody of children -- United States -- Evaluation. --- Law -- Psychological aspects. --- Social Sciences --- Psychology --- Custody of children --- Evaluation. --- Child custody --- Children --- Children, Custody of --- Parental custody --- Custody --- Law and legislation --- Psychology. --- Social work. --- Families. --- Families --- Law and Psychology. --- Family. --- Social Work. --- Social aspects. --- Divorce --- Divorce mediation --- Guardian and ward --- Parent and child (Law) --- Absentee fathers --- Absentee mothers --- Parental relocation (Child custody) --- Visitation rights (Domestic relations) --- Law --- Psychological aspects. --- Benevolent institutions --- Philanthropy --- Relief stations (for the poor) --- Social service agencies --- Social welfare --- Social work --- Human services --- Juridical psychology --- Juristic psychology --- Legal psychology --- Psychology, Juridical --- Psychology, Juristic --- Psychology, Legal --- Psychology, Applied --- Therapeutic jurisprudence --- Families—Social aspects. --- Family --- Family life --- Family relationships --- Family structure --- Relationships, Family --- Structure, Family --- Social institutions --- Birth order --- Domestic relations --- Home --- Households --- Kinship --- Marriage --- Matriarchy --- Parenthood --- Patriarchy --- Behavioral sciences --- Mental philosophy --- Mind --- Science, Mental --- Human biology --- Philosophy --- Soul --- Mental health --- Social aspects --- Social conditions