Listing 1 - 7 of 7 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Banks and banking, Central --- Economic stabilization --- Flow of funds --- Monetary policy
Choose an application
The National Accounts of OECD Countries, Detailed Tables includes, in addition to main aggregates, final consumption expenditure of households by purpose, simplified accounts for three main sectors: general government, corporations and households. Data are shown for 34 OECD countries and the Euro area back to 2004. Country tables are expressed in national currency. Data are based on the System of National Accounts 1993 (1993 SNA) for all countries except Australia which is presented on the basis of the 2008 SNA. The data in this publication are also available on line via www.oecd-ilibrary.org
Capital market -- OECD countries -- Periodicals. --- Finance, Public -- OECD countries -- Statistics -- Periodicals. --- Financial institutions -- OECD countries -- Periodicals. --- Financial statements -- OECD countries -- Periodicals. --- Gross national product --- National income --- Accounting --- Net national product --- Flow of funds --- Income --- GNP (Gross national product) --- National product, Gross --- Economics --- Statistics --- Wealth
Choose an application
Essential reading for practitioners, scholars and theorists in economics and development studies.
Global Financial Crisis, 2008-2009. --- Capital movements --- Global Economic Crisis, 2008-2009 --- Subprime Mortgage Crisis, 2008-2009 --- Financial crises --- Developing countries --- Emerging nations --- Fourth World --- Global South --- LDC's --- Least developed countries --- Less developed countries --- Newly industrialized countries --- Newly industrializing countries --- NICs (Newly industrialized countries) --- Third World --- Underdeveloped areas --- Underdeveloped countries --- Economic conditions --- Finance --- Flow of funds --- Investments --- Global Financial Crisis, 2008-2009 --- Global Financial Crisis (2008-2009) --- Commerce. --- E-books --- Business & Economics --- Development --- Economic Development
Choose an application
Statistical offices have often recourse to benchmarking methods for compiling quarterly national accounts (QNA). Benchmarking methods employ quarterly indicator series (i) to distribute annual, more reliable series of national accounts and (ii) to extrapolate the most recent quarters not yet covered by annual benchmarks. The Proportional First Differences (PFD) benchmarking method proposed by Denton (1971) is a widely used solution for distribution, but in extrapolation it may suffer when the movements in the indicator series do not match consistently the movements in the target annual benchmarks. For this reason, an enhanced formula for extrapolation was recommended by the IMF’s Quarterly National Accounts Manual: Concepts, Data Sources, and Compilation (2001). We discuss the rationale behind this technique, and propose a matrix formulation of it. In addition, we present applications of the enhanced formula to artificial and real-life benchmarking examples showing how the extrapolations for the most recent quarters can be improved.
Management --- Business & Economics --- Management Styles & Communication --- Benchmarking (Management) --- Managerial accounting. --- Management accounting --- Benchmarks (Management) --- Accounting --- Total quality management --- Managerial accounting --- National income --- Statistical methods --- E-books --- Net national product --- Flow of funds --- Gross national product --- Income --- Macroeconomics --- Industries: General --- Industries: Manufacturing --- Time-Series Models --- Dynamic Quantile Regressions --- Dynamic Treatment Effect Models --- Diffusion Processes --- Optimization Techniques --- Programming Models --- Dynamic Analysis --- Methodology for Collecting, Estimating, and Organizing Macroeconomic Data --- Data Access --- General Aggregative Models: General --- Industry Studies: Manufacturing: General --- Macroeconomics: Production --- Manufacturing industries --- National accounts --- Manufacturing --- Industrial production --- Industries --- Korea, Republic of
Choose an application
This paper questions the view that leverage should have forewarned us of the global financial crisis of 2007-09, pointing to several gearing indicators that were neither useful portents of the onset of the crisis nor of its ferocity. Instead it shows, first, that the use of ill-suited collateral in the secured funding operations of U.S.-based investment banks was the fatal link between the collapse of structured finance and the global malfunction of funding markets that turbocharged the downdraft; and, second, that this insight (and others) can be decrypted from the Flow of Funds Accounts of the United States.
Business & Economics --- Economic Theory --- Financial crises. --- Global Financial Crisis, 2008-2009. --- Financial leverage. --- Leverage, Financial --- Global Economic Crisis, 2008-2009 --- Subprime Mortgage Crisis, 2008-2009 --- Crashes, Financial --- Crises, Financial --- Financial crashes --- Financial panics --- Panics (Finance) --- Stock exchange crashes --- Stock market panics --- Finance --- Financial crises --- Crises --- Global Financial Crisis, 2008-2009 --- Financial leverage --- Securities --- Investment banking --- Global Financial Crisis (2008-2009) --- E-books --- Banks and Banking --- Investments: General --- Macroeconomics --- Money and Monetary Policy --- Industries: Financial Services --- Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit: General --- Financial Institutions and Services: General --- General Financial Markets: General (includes Measurement and Data) --- General Aggregative Models: General --- Banks --- Depository Institutions --- Micro Finance Institutions --- Mortgages --- Monetary economics --- Investment & securities --- Banking --- Credit --- Financial sector --- Flow of funds --- Commercial banks --- Financial services industry --- Financial instruments --- Banks and banking --- United States
Choose an application
This paper shows that donors that maximize relative aid impact spread their budgets across many recipient countries in a unique Nash equilibrium, explaining aid fragmentation. This equilibrium may be inefficient even without fixed costs, and the inefficiency increases in the equality of donors budgets. The paper presents empirical evidence consistent with theoretical results. These imply that, short of ending donors maximization of relative aid impact, agreements to better coordinate aid allocations are not implementable. Moreover, since policies to increase donor competition in terms of aid effectiveness risk reinforcing relativeness, they may well backfire, as any such reinforcement increases aid fragmentation.
Business & Economics --- Economic History --- Economic assistance. --- Flow of funds. --- Economic aid --- Foreign aid program --- Foreign assistance --- Grants-in-aid, International --- International economic assistance --- International grants-in-aid --- Finance --- Economic policy --- International economic relations --- Conditionality (International relations) --- Economic assistance --- E-books --- Budgeting --- Exports and Imports --- Finance: General --- Social Services and Welfare --- Poverty and Homelessness --- Analysis of Collective Decision-Making: General --- Foreign Aid --- International Fiscal Issues --- International Public Goods --- National Budget --- Budget Systems --- Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty: General --- General Financial Markets: General (includes Measurement and Data) --- Government Policy --- Provision and Effects of Welfare Program --- International economics --- Budgeting & financial management --- Poverty & precarity --- Social welfare & social services --- Foreign aid --- Budget planning and preparation --- Poverty --- Competition --- Poverty reduction --- Public financial management (PFM) --- Financial markets --- International relief --- Budget --- China, People's Republic of
Choose an application
It is generally acknowledged that the government’s output is difficult to define and its value is hard to measure. The practical solution, adopted by national accounts systems, is to equate output to input costs. However, several studies estimate significant inefficiencies in government activities (i.e., same output could be achieved with less inputs), implying that inputs are not a good approximation for outputs. If taken seriously, the next logical step is to purge from GDP the fraction of government inputs that is wasted. As differences in the quality of the public sector have a direct impact on citizens’ effective consumption of public and private goods and services, we must take them into account when computing a measure of living standards. We illustrate such a correction computing corrected per capita GDPs on the basis of two studies that estimate efficiency scores for several dimensions of government activities. We show that the correction could be significant, and rankings of living standards could be re-ordered as a result.
Business & Economics --- Economic Theory --- Cost and standard of living. --- Economic development. --- Comfort, Standard of --- Cost of living --- Food, Cost of --- Household expenses --- Living, Cost of --- Living, Standard of --- Standard of living --- Development, Economic --- Economic growth --- Growth, Economic --- Consumption (Economics) --- Home economics --- Households --- Quality of life --- Wealth --- Luxury --- Prices --- Purchasing power --- Wages --- Economic policy --- Economics --- Statics and dynamics (Social sciences) --- Development economics --- Resource curse --- Surveys --- Economic development --- Cost and standard of living --- Gross domestic product --- National income --- Government productivity --- Econometric models --- E-books --- Productivity, Government --- Capital productivity --- Production (Economic theory) --- Public administration --- Net national product --- Flow of funds --- Gross national product --- Income --- Domestic product, Gross --- GDP --- Macroeconomics --- Public Finance --- Measurement and Data on National Income and Product Accounts and Wealth --- Environmental Accounts --- Publicly Provided Goods: General --- Public Administration --- Public Sector Accounting and Audits --- Social Security and Public Pensions --- Health: General --- Public Enterprises --- Public-Private Enterprises --- Education: General --- General Aggregative Models: General --- National Government Expenditures and Health --- Health economics --- Civil service & public sector --- Education --- Public finance & taxation --- Health --- Public sector --- National accounts --- Health care spending --- Economic sectors --- Expenditure --- Finance, Public --- Expenditures, Public --- Cyprus
Listing 1 - 7 of 7 |
Sort by
|