Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

This book addresses two central questions in current research on the Gospel of Thomas: what was its original language and which early Christian works influenced it? At present, theories of Thomas as a Semitic work abound. Simon Gathercole dismantles these approaches, arguing instead that Thomas is Greek literature and that the matter of Thomas's original language is connected with an even more controverted question: that of the relationship between Thomas and the canonical New Testament. Rather than being independent of Matthew, Mark and Luke (as in most Western Aramaic theories of Thomas) or thoroughly dependent on the four gospels (as in most Syriac approaches), Gathercole develops a newly refined approach to how Thomas is influenced by the Synoptic Gospels. Thomas can be seen to refer to Matthew as a gospel writer, and evidence is discussed showing that Thomas incorporates phraseology distinctive to Luke, while also extending that special Lukan language.

Gospel of Thomas (Coptic Gospel) --- Language, style --- Criticism, interpretation, etc. --- 229*411 --- Evangelie van Thomas. Koptisch evangelie van Thomas --- Bible. --- Evangelie van Thomas (Coptic Gospel) --- Evangelium Thomae Copticum --- Thomas-Evangelium (Coptic Gospel) --- Toma Pogŭmsŏ (Coptic Gospel) --- Language, style. --- 229*411 Evangelie van Thomas. Koptisch evangelie van Thomas --- Christianity. --- Christianity --- Religions --- Church history --- Arts and Humanities --- Religion --- Evangile de Thomas (G) --- Evangile de Thomas (G) (Évangile gnostique)

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Is Q a Galilean text representing a non-messianic and non-apocalypticGalilean branch of the early Jesus movement? Simon J. Joseph proposes a new working model for understanding the Jewish ethnicity, community, provenance, and compositional traits in Q - the earliest and most reliable source fothe Palestinian Jewish Jesus movment.

Q hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Jesus Christ --- Historicity --- Dead Sea scrolls --- 226.1 --- 229*3 --- Logia source (Synoptics criticism) --- Q document (Synoptics criticism) --- Sayings source (Synoptics criticism) --- Synoptic problem --- Two source hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- 229*3 Dode Zeerollen en intertestamentaire literatuur --- Dode Zeerollen en intertestamentaire literatuur --- 226.1 Evangelies: synoptici; synoptisch probleem; Q; Quelle --- Evangelies: synoptici; synoptisch probleem; Q; Quelle --- Christ --- Cristo --- Jezus Chrystus --- Jesus Cristo --- Jesus, --- Christ, Jesus --- Yeh-su --- Masīḥ --- Khristos --- Gesù --- Christo --- Yeshua --- Chrystus --- Gesú Cristo --- Ježíš --- Isa, --- Nabi Isa --- Isa Al-Masih --- Al-Masih, Isa --- Masih, Isa Al --- -Jesus, --- Jesucristo --- Yesu --- Yeh-su Chi-tu --- Iēsous --- Iēsous Christos --- Iēsous, --- Kʻristos --- Hisus Kʻristos --- Christos --- Jesuo --- Yeshuʻa ben Yosef --- Yeshua ben Yoseph --- Iisus --- Iisus Khristos --- Jeschua ben Joseph --- Ieso Kriʻste --- Yesus --- Kristus --- ישו --- ישו הנוצרי --- ישו הנצרי --- ישוע --- ישוע בן יוסף --- المسيح --- مسيح --- يسوع المسيح --- 耶稣 --- 耶稣基督 --- 예수그리스도 --- Jíizis --- Yéshoua --- Iėsu̇s --- Khrist Iėsu̇s --- ‏عيسىٰ‏ --- Historicity. --- Dead Sea scrolls. --- Jerusalem scrolls --- ʻAin Fashka scrolls --- Jericho scrolls --- Scrolls, Dead Sea --- Qumrân scrolls --- Rękopisy z Qumran --- Shikai bunsho --- Megilot Midbar Yehudah --- Dodezee-rollen --- Kumránské rukopisy --- Documentos de Qumrán --- Textos de Qumrán --- Rollos del Mar Muerto --- Manuscritos del Mar Muerto --- Manuscrits de la mer Morte --- Dödahavsrullarna --- Kumranin kirjoitukset --- Kuolleenmeren kirjoitukset --- Qumranhandskrifterna --- Qumranin kirjoitukset --- Qumran Caves scrolls --- Jesus Christ - Historicity

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

While Richard Baxter (1615-91) has been called the ‘chief of English Protestant schoolmen’, few studies of his theology exist, and none of his major systematic work the Methodus Theologiae (1681). Through examining the scriptural and metaphysical foundations of his exemplaristic logic, and engaging extensively with his medieval and early modern sources, this study presents Baxter’s understanding of method as the unfolding of the believer’s relation with the Triune God through salvation history, revealing his profound debt to Scotist and Nominalist thought. In tracing the manifold ramifications of this method it offers a fresh reading of Baxter’s soteriology, countering the charges of moralism and rationalism often levelled at him, and placing his thought within a scholastic paradigm of ‘faith seeking understanding’.

Theology --- Trinity --- Salvation --- RELIGION / Christian Theology / Systematic --- RELIGION / Christianity / General --- Theology, Doctrinal --- Triads (Philosophy) --- Appropriation (Christian theology) --- God (Christianity) --- Godhead (Mormon theology) --- Holy Spirit --- Trinities --- Tritheism --- Propaedeutics of theology --- Methodology. --- History of doctrines. --- Christianity --- History of doctrines --- Propaedeutics --- Baxter, Richard, --- 2 BAXTER, RICHARD --- Religion --- 2 BAXTER, RICHARD Godsdienst. Theologie--BAXTER, RICHARD --- Godsdienst. Theologie--BAXTER, RICHARD --- Christianity&delete& --- Methodology

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

College environment --- College students --- College students --- Folklore --- Social life and customs

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)