Listing 1 - 2 of 2 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Most analyses of conflict assume that conflicting groups act in a unitary fashion. This assumption is often violated: to reduce their risk of replacement, group leaders prevent both group members and soldiers from acting collectively, making it difficult for leaders to make credible commitments to them. Lifting the assumption that groups are unitary shifts the analysis of a wide range of conflict issues. The effects of income shocks and rents on conflict risk become contingent on collective action. Leader decisions regarding collective action explain the forcible recruitment of child soldiers and predation on civilians: leaders who prefer to limit military organization are more likely to pursue these tactics. Leader decisions regarding collective action also introduce an unexplored mechanism by which state capacity is created and a specific reason to regard state capacity as endogenous to conflict risk. This focus, finally, suggests that interventions to reduce conflict risk, such as safety net payments or service delivery, are likely to be most difficult to deliver precisely where leaders are most reluctant to allow collective action and where, therefore, conflict risk is highest.
Armed Conflict --- Civil war --- Collective action --- Conflict --- Credible commitment --- International Terrorism & Counterterrorism --- Labor Policies --- Macroeconomics and Economic Growth --- Peace & Peacekeeping --- Post Conflict Reconstruction
Choose an application
The government provision of free or subsidized bed nets to combat malaria in Benin allows the identification of new channels through which mass media affect public policy outcomes. Prior research has concluded that governments provide greater private benefits to better-informed individuals. This paper shows, for the first time, that governments can also respond by exploiting informed individuals' greater willingness to pay for these benefits. Using a "natural experiment" in radio markets in northern Benin, the paper finds that media access increases the likelihood that households pay for the bed nets they receive from government, rather than getting them for free. Households more exposed to radio programming on the benefits of bed nets and the hazards of malaria place a higher value on bed nets. Local government officials exercise significant discretion over bed net pricing and respond to higher demand by selling bed nets that they could have distributed for free. Mass media appears to change the private behavior of citizens-in this case, to invest more of their own resources on a public health good (bed nets)-but not their ability to extract greater benefits from government.
Accountability --- Bednets --- Education For All --- Health Monitoring & Evaluation --- Knowledge Economy --- Law and Development --- Macroeconomics and Economic Growth --- Malaria --- Mass media --- Population Policies --- Radio
Listing 1 - 2 of 2 |
Sort by
|