Listing 1 - 5 of 5 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
This paper extends the effective average tax rate (EATR) developed in Devereux and Griffith (2003) by relaxing the assumption of a one-period perturbation in the capital stock. Instead it allows a permanent investment. While this may appear a small change, it has important implications. First, it allows the EATR to be calculated in the presence of tax holidays, which are an important part of tax systems, especially in developing countries. Second, it reveals an interesting feature of the original EATR: despite the assumption of a one-period investment, the original measure is informative about long-term investments, thanks to the assumption of pooled depreciation. Without this assumption-which is justifiable in a few countries only- the EATR based on one-period perturbation in the capital stock would be less useful for analyzing medium and long-term investments.
Investments --- Taxation --- Tax rates --- Tax tables --- Investing --- Investment management --- Portfolio --- Finance --- Disinvestment --- Loans --- Saving and investment --- Speculation --- Econometric models. --- Rates and tables. --- Investments: General --- Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue: General --- Investment --- Capital --- Intangible Capital --- Capacity --- Public finance & taxation --- Macroeconomics --- Depreciation --- Effective tax rate --- Tax holidays --- Average effective tax rate --- Marginal effective tax rate --- Tax administration and procedure --- Tax incentives --- Canada
Choose an application
The structure of Japan's corporate income tax system is broadly in line with those of other G7 countries. However, relatively high marginal and average effective tax rates prompt the question of whether adjustments should be considered to meet the objectives of promoting growth, investment and competitiveness in a revenue neutral manner. This paper discusses key issues and trade-off's related to changes in the corporate income tax system. It does not provide recommendations, but raises issues that could hopefully serve as useful inputs to the ongoing discussion and tax debate in Japan.
Corporations --- Taxation --- Investments: General --- Public Finance --- Corporate Taxation --- Business Taxes and Subsidies --- Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue: General --- Investment --- Capital --- Intangible Capital --- Capacity --- Corporate & business tax --- Public finance & taxation --- Macroeconomics --- Corporate income tax --- Corporate taxes --- Average effective tax rate --- Depreciation --- Revenue administration --- Taxes --- Marginal effective tax rate --- Tax policy --- National accounts --- Tax administration and procedure --- Saving and investment --- Revenue --- Income tax --- Japan
Choose an application
Motivated by the concern that corporate income tax (CIT) competition may have eroded the tax base, this paper calculates average effective tax rates to measure the impact of CIT competition, including the widespread use of tax holidays, on the tax base for 15 countries in the Caribbean. The results not only confirm erosion of the tax base, but also show that CIT holidays must be removed for recent tax policy initiatives (such as accelerated depreciation, loss carry forward provisions, and tax harmonization) to be effective. These findings suggest that the authorities should either avoid granting CIT holidays or rely more on other taxes (including consumption taxes such as the value-added tax) in order to broaden the tax base.
Corporations --- Taxation --- Tax rates --- Tax tables --- Corporate income tax --- Corporate taxes --- Corporation income tax --- Corporation tax --- Federal corporation tax --- Franchises, Taxation of --- Taxation of franchises --- Taxation. --- Rates and tables. --- Finance --- Valuation --- Corporate Taxation --- Business Taxes and Subsidies --- Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue: General --- Corporate & business tax --- Public finance & taxation --- Tax holidays --- Tax harmonization --- Average effective tax rate --- Tax incentives --- Tax administration and procedure --- Bahamas, The
Choose an application
This study discusses the Philippine output gap from three perspectives and evaluates the utility of the approaches for policymaking. Incentives in the Philippines appear broadly comparable with those in neighboring countries. The reform would also improve short- and especially medium-term revenue collection. The general tax provisions and investment incentives in seven east-Asian economies are compared. The analysis focuses on stocks of foreign assets and liabilities and adopts a cross-country perspective to help determine the Philippines’ position within a broader universe of emerging market economies.
Exports and Imports --- Investments: General --- Taxation --- Corporate Taxation --- Production and Operations Management --- Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue: General --- Macroeconomics: Production --- Business Taxes and Subsidies --- International Investment --- Long-term Capital Movements --- Investment --- Capital --- Intangible Capital --- Capacity --- Public finance & taxation --- Macroeconomics --- Corporate & business tax --- Finance --- Investment & securities --- Tax holidays --- Tax incentives --- Output gap --- Effective tax rate --- Corporate income tax --- Taxes --- Production --- Tax policy --- Economic theory --- Tax administration and procedure --- Corporations --- Investments, Foreign --- Philippines
Choose an application
We compare the general tax provisions and investment incentives in the Philippines to six other east-Asian economies-Malaysia, Indonesia, Lao, Vietnam, Cambodia, and Thailand. We calculate effective tax rates and find that general effective tax rates are relatively high in the Philippines, while investment incentives are comparable to those in neighboring countries. Tax holidays are most attractive for very profitable firms, creating redundancy, and for investment in short-lived assets. We also consider recently-proposed tax reforms that would replace tax holidays by a reduced corporate income tax rate or a low tax on gross receipts. The results suggest that this would result in stronger incentives to invest, while government revenue increases. Alternatively, replacing holidays with a general reduction in the corporate tax rate and offering accelerated depreciation will either not provide the same incentives or be very costly.
Investment tax credit --- Tax incentives --- Corporations --- Taxation --- Business corporations --- C corporations --- Corporations, Business --- Corporations, Public --- Limited companies --- Publicly held corporations --- Publicly traded corporations --- Public limited companies --- Stock corporations --- Subchapter C corporations --- Business enterprises --- Corporate power --- Disincorporation --- Stocks --- Trusts, Industrial --- Incentives, Tax --- Tax subsidies --- Tax expenditures --- Capital investments --- Depreciation allowances --- Tax credits --- Investments: General --- Corporate Taxation --- Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue: General --- Business Taxes and Subsidies --- Investment --- Capital --- Intangible Capital --- Capacity --- Public finance & taxation --- Corporate & business tax --- Macroeconomics --- Tax holidays --- Effective tax rate --- Corporate income tax --- Depreciation --- Tax administration and procedure --- Saving and investment --- Philippines
Listing 1 - 5 of 5 |
Sort by
|