Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Wordsworth, William, --- Wœ̄tsawœ̄t, Winlīam, --- Wurdzwurth, Wilyam, --- Varḍsavartha Viliyama, --- Axiologus, --- Criticism and interpretation.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Wordsworth, William, --- Wœ̄tsawœ̄t, Winlīam, --- Wurdzwurth, Wilyam, --- Varḍsavartha Viliyama, --- Axiologus, --- Coleridge, Samuel Taylor, --- Criticism and interpretation.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Wordsworth wrote that he longed to compose 'some philosophic Song/Of Truth that cherishes our daily life'. Yet he never finished The Recluse, his long philosophical poem. Simon Jarvis argues that Wordsworth's aspiration to 'philosophic song' is central to his greatness, and changed the way English poetry was written. Some critics see Wordworth as a systematic thinker, while for others he is a poet first, and a thinker only (if at all) second. Jarvis shows instead how essential both philosophy and the 'song' of poetry were to Wordsworth's achievement. Drawing on advanced work in continental philosophy and social theory to address the ideological attacks which have dominated much recent commentary, Jarvis reads Wordsworth's writing both critically and philosophically, to show how Wordsworth thinks through and in verse. This study rethinks the relation between poetry and society itself by analysing the tensions between thinking philosophically and writing poetry.

Self (Philosophy) in literature. --- Philosophy in literature --- Self (Philosophy) in literature --- Wordsworth, William, --- Wœ̄tsawœ̄t, Winlīam, --- Wurdzwurth, Wilyam, --- Varḍsavartha Viliyama, --- Axiologus, --- Criticism and interpretation. --- Philosophy. --- Philosophy in literature. --- Arts and Humanities --- Literature

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

In a series of articles published in Tait's Magazine in 1834, Thomas DeQuincey catalogued four potential instances of plagiarism in the work of his friend and literary competitor Samuel Taylor Coleridge. DeQuincey's charges and the controversy they ignited have shaped readers' responses to the work of such writers as Coleridge, Lord Byron, William Wordsworth, and John Clare ever since. But what did plagiarism mean some two hundred years ago in Britain? What was at stake when early nineteenth-century authors levied such charges against each other? How would matters change if we were to evaluate these writers by the standards of their own national moment? And what does our moral investment in plagiarism tell us about ourselves and about our relationship to the Romantic myth of authorship? In Plagiarism and Literary Property in the Romantic Period, Tilar Mazzeo historicizes the discussion of late eighteenth- and early nineteenth-century plagiarism and demonstrates that it had little in common with our current understanding of the term. The book offers a major reassessment of the role of borrowing, textual appropriation, and narrative mastery in British Romantic literature and provides a new picture of the period and its central aesthetic contests. Above all, Mazzeo challenges the almost exclusive modern association of Romanticism with originality and takes a fresh look at some of the most familiar writings of the period and the controversies surrounding them.

English poetry --- Intellectual property --- Plagiarism --- Romanticism --- Authorship --- Copyright infringement --- Literary ethics --- Literature --- Quotation --- Torts --- Imitation in literature --- Originality in literature --- IP (Intellectual property) --- Proprietary rights --- Rights, Proprietary --- Intangible property --- History and criticism --- History --- Law and legislation --- Byron, George Gordon Byron, --- Coleridge, Samuel Taylor, --- Shelley, Percy Bysshe --- Wordsworth, William, --- Wœ̄tsawœ̄t, Winlīam, --- Wurdzwurth, Wilyam, --- Varḍsavartha Viliyama, --- Axiologus, --- Shelley, P. B. --- Sheli, Persi Bish, --- Hsüeh-lai, --- Hermit of Marlow, --- Marlow, --- Victor, --- Shelli, Persi-Bishi, --- Šéli, Pérsi Ba, --- Shilī, --- Selley, Persy Byss, --- Shelli, P., --- Шелли, Перси Биши, --- שלי, פרסי ביש --- שלי, פרסי ביש, --- שעלי, פוירסי --- شلي --- Śeli, Pārsi Bīśa, --- Coleridge, S. T. --- Kolʹridzh, Samuil, --- Кольридж, Самуил, --- Kolʹridzh, Samuil Teĭlor, --- Кольридж, Самуил Тейлор, --- Kūlīridzh, Ṣāmwīl Tīlūr, --- קולרידג׳, סמיואל טיילור --- Kūlīridj, Ṣāmwīl Tīlūr, --- كولردج، صمويل تيلور, --- קאָלרידש, ס. ט., --- Byron, George Gordon Byron --- Baĭron, Dzhordzh Gordon --- Baĭron, G. --- Baĭron, Jorj, --- Bairon, --- Bajron, Džordž Gordon --- Bajron, --- Bajroni, Xhorxh --- Bayrěn, --- Bayron, --- Bayron, Tzōrtz Gkorton Bayron --- Bayrūn --- Byron, George Gordon Noël Byron --- Byron, Jerzy Gordon --- Byron, --- Gordon, George --- Mpayron, Tzōrtz Nkorton Mpayron --- Pai-lun --- Payrěn --- Vyrōn --- בײראָן, לאָרד --- בירון --- בירון, לורד --- בירון, ג׳ורג׳ גורדון נואל, --- בירון, ג'ורג' גורדון בירון, --- בייראן --- בייראן, --- בייראן, לארד --- ביירון, לורד --- ביירון, --- Criticism and interpretation. --- Book history --- Industrial and intellectual property --- anno 1700-1799 --- anno 1800-1899 --- Lord Byron --- Byron --- Byron, George Gordon Noël --- History and criticism. --- Shelley, Percy Bysshe, --- Cultural Studies. --- Literature.