Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

In this powerfully argued book, Ian Shapiro shows that the idea of containment offers the best hope for protecting Americans and their democracy into the future. His bold vision for American security in the post-September 11 world is reminiscent of George Kennan's historic "Long Telegram," in which the containment strategy that won the Cold War was first developed. The Bush Doctrine of preemptive war and unilateral action has been marked by incompetence--missed opportunities to capture Osama bin Laden, failures of postwar planning for Iraq, and lack of an exit strategy. But Shapiro contends that the problems run deeper. He explains how the Bush Doctrine departs from the best traditions of American national-security policy and accepted international norms, and renders Americans and democratic values less safe. He debunks the belief that containment is obsolete. Terror networks might be elusive, but the enabling states that make them dangerous can be contained. Shapiro defends containment against charges of appeasement, arguing that force against a direct threat will be needed. He outlines new approaches to intelligence, finance, allies, diplomacy, and international institutions. He explains why containment is the best alternative to a misguided agenda that naively assumes democratic regime change is possible from the barrel of an American gun. President Bush has defined the War on Terror as the decisive ideological struggle of our time. Shapiro shows what a self-defeating mistake that is. He sets out a viable alternative that offers real security to Americans, reclaims America's international stature, and promotes democracy around the world.

Terrorism --- National security --- 854 Terrorisme --- 820 Internationale betrekkingen --- 876 Veiligheidspolitiek --- Prevention --- Government policy --- History --- 876 VeiligheidspolitiekPrevention

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Threats of force are a common feature of international politics, advocated by some as an economical guarantee against the outbreak of war and condemned by others as a recipe for war. Article 2(4) of the United Nations Charter forbids states to use threats of force, yet the meaning of the prohibition is unclear. This book provides the first comprehensive appraisal of the no-threat principle: its origin, underlying rationale, theoretical implications, relevant jurisprudence, and how it has withstood the test of time from 1945 to the present. Based on a systematic evaluation of state and United Nations practices, the book identifies what constitutes a threat of force and when its use is justified under the United Nations Charter. In so doing, it relates the no-threat principle to important concepts of the twentieth century, such as deterrence, escalation, crisis management, and what has been aptly described as the 'diplomacy of violence'.

Ultimatums (International relations) --- Aggression (International law) --- Crimes against peace. --- Incitement to war --- Peace, Crimes against --- War, Incitement to --- War propaganda --- Crime --- Peace --- International law --- Ultimatums --- International relations --- 820 Internationale betrekkingen --- 821.4 Internationale rechtspraak --- Aggression (International law). --- Ultimatums (International relations). --- Ultimatums. --- Aggression (International law ) --- Law --- General and Others