Listing 1 - 3 of 3 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
The attacks of September 11 2001 spectacularly demonstrated that America’s main security challenges did not stem from traditional power rivalries but rather from ‘grey areas’, failed or badly governed states which are breeding grounds for extremism. Today the emphasis has shifted from focusing on relations between states to acting directly on states themselves, so as to pre-empt the growth of terrorism, arms proliferation, genocide, civil wars etc. After the concept of the ‘global war on terror’, President George W. Bush put forward his ‘freedom agenda’ aiming to promote democracy as a response to the security challenges facing the world, in particular in the Middle East. But overthrowing tyrants and holding elections is not enough to create a stable and well-governed democracy and can even, in some cases, complicate matters, as events between 2003 and 2005 in Iraq, Afghanistan, the Palestinian Authority and Egypt have shown. This is where ‘transformational diplomacy’, the concept inaug-urated by Condoleezza Rice in early 2006, comes in. Basically this consists in working with the partners of the United States with a view to ‘build and sustain democratic, well-governed states that will respond to the needs of their people and conduct themselves responsibly in the international system.’ To enable this to happen, it is first of all American diplomacy which must transform itself, so as to become less ‘analytical’ and more operational, characterised by direct involvement in foreign societies rather than just being restricted to the realm of foreign policy. This Chaillot Paper explores the scope and limits of this ‘transformative’ action: is the realist paradigm, that of interpower rivalries, really no longer relevant ? Can diplomats transform themselves into active promoters of good governance ? Are other countries ready to accept them in this role, or will they accuse them of interference ? Can transformational diplomacy really change the world ?
Security, International --- Sécurité internationale --- United States --- Etats-Unis --- Foreign relations --- Relations extérieures --- #SBIB:327.5H00 --- #SBIB:327.6H40 --- #SBIB:327H15 --- Strategie en vredesonderzoek: algemeen --- Internationale en diplomatieke relaties: periode na de Koude Oorlog / Val van de Muur --- Buitenlandse politiek: Noord-Amerika --- Sécurité internationale --- Relations extérieures
Choose an application
Après le 11 Septembre, la toute-puissance de George W. Bush sur le système politique américain s’est imposée. Mais, dès 2005, le législatif s’est rebiffé. La Cour suprême a réaffirmé l’indépendance du judiciaire. Bref, les freins et contrepoids étaient de retour. Cet épisode résume à lui seul l’histoire et les ambiguïtés de la « présidence impériale » américaine depuis la montée en puissance de Franklin D. Roosevelt. Denis Lacorne et Justin Vaïsse ont rassemblé autour d’eux les meilleurs spécialistes français et américains de cette question pour offrir, en français et en anglais, une plongée au cœur de la démocratie américaine. Ils remontent le temps pour faire comprendre les origines historiques de la présidence impériale. Surtout, ils font découvrir le débat qui fait rage, aux États-Unis, entre les partisans d’un exécutif fort et ceux d’une démocratie moins impériale… et moins impérialiste.
Presidents --- Separation of powers --- Présidents --- Séparation des pouvoirs --- Executive power --- Présidents --- Séparation des pouvoirs --- Presidents - United States - 20th century - Congresses --- Presidents - United States - 21st century - Congresses --- Executive power - United States - Congresses
Choose an application
Islam --- Islam and politics --- Social integration --- Islam et politique --- Intégration sociale --- Government policy --- Politique gouvernementale --- France --- Politics and government --- Politique et gouvernement --- Intégration sociale
Listing 1 - 3 of 3 |
Sort by
|