Listing 1 - 3 of 3 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Separation of powers --- Séparation des pouvoirs --- Séparation des pouvoirs
Choose an application
L'arret Marbury c/ Madison de 1803 marque l'histoire constitutionnelle des Etats-Unis. La Constitution de 1787 ne prévoyait pas à l'origine de véritable contrôle de constitutionnalité des normes juridiques. La Cour suprême interprétait les lois et déterminait celle applicable à l'espèce (la loi fédérale ou la loi d'Etat). Par l'arrêt Marbury c/ Madison, la Cour, sous l'influence de son président Marshall, s'est reconnu le droit de contrôler la constitutionnalité des lois et des actes administratifs de l'executif. Ce pourvoir ainsi octroyé permet donc au gouvernement américain (par le biais de son pouvoir judiciaire), au Congès et au Président de participer activement à la fonction législative. Les actes de ce colloque offrent une vison historique, juridique et contemporaine du sujet. Les contributions de ce colloque sont rédigées pour moitié en anglais et français
Judicial review - United States - History - Congresses. --- Separation of powers - United States - History - Congresses. --- Contrôle juridictionnel des lois - États-Unis - Histoire - Congrès. --- Séparation des pouvoirs - États-Unis - Histoire - Congrès. --- Marbury, William, - 1761 or 1762-1835 - Trials, litigation, etc. - Congresses. --- Madison, James, - 1751-1836 - Trials, litigation, etc. - Congresses. --- Marbury, William, - 1761 ou 1762-1835 - Procès, instances, etc. - Congrès. --- Madison, James, - 1751-1836 - Procès, instances, etc. - Congrès. --- Judicial review --- Separation of powers --- Contrôle juridictionnel des lois --- Séparation des pouvoirs --- Marbury, William, - 1761 or 1762-1835 --- Madison, James, - 1751-1836 --- Marbury, William, - 1761 ou 1762-1835
Choose an application
The frontier between 'law' and 'politics' is not always clear-cut. A large area exists where courts operate, but where governments and parliaments also make decisions. Tim Koopmans compares the way American, British, French and German law and politics deal with different issues: in many instances subjects which are highly 'political' in one country constitute legal issues in another. Is there, for example a 'sovereign Parliament' (as there is in Britain), or will courts control the compatibility of statutes with the Constitution (as in the United States and Germany)? How far can courts go in controlling the legality of administrative action? Are there general legal theories about the frontier between what courts and what politics can do? Koopmans considers case law on a range of issues, including human rights protection, federalism, separation of powers, equal protection and the impact of European and international law.
Comparative law. --- Courts. --- Justice, Administration of. --- Law --- Political aspects. --- Law of civil procedure --- Politics --- France --- United States --- Great Britain --- Germany --- Courts --- Justice, Administration of --- Comparative law --- Tribunaux --- Justice --- Droit et politique --- Droit comparé --- Administration --- General and Others --- Comparative jurisprudence --- Comparative legislation --- Jurisprudence, Comparative --- Law, Comparative --- Legislation, Comparative --- Law and politics --- Administration of justice --- Judiciary --- Dispute resolution (Law) --- Judicial districts --- Procedure (Law) --- Judicial power --- Jurisdiction --- Law and legislation --- United States of America --- DROIT PUBLIC COMPARE --- SEPARATION DES POUVOIRS --- POUVOIR JUDICIAIRE --- CONSTITUTIONNALITE DES LOIS --- LEGALITE DES ACTES ADMINISTRATIFS
Listing 1 - 3 of 3 |
Sort by
|